Evaluation of biomechanical effects of different implant thread designs and diameters on all-on-four concept

被引:1
|
作者
Zor, Z. F. [1 ]
Kilinc, Y. [1 ]
Erkmen, E. [1 ]
Kurt, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Atilim Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
All-on-four; Dental implants; finite element analysis; Mandible; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; DIFFERENT FIXATION METHODS; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; ATROPHIC MAXILLA; BONE; LENGTH;
D O I
10.23805/JO.2021.13.03.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim All-on-four concept involves the use of four anterior dental implants in the edentulous jaw to overcome anatomic limitations of residual alveolar bone. The impact of implant thread design and diameter on the biomechanical performance of all-on-four concept is not yet fully understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of all-on-four concept with different combinations of thread designs and diameters through a three dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Materials and methods Six three-dimensional finite element models of edentulous mandible were developed. The models included the combinations of 3.5 and 4.3 mm diameter implants with active and passive thread designs. Vertical, oblique and horizontal loads were applied anterior to the end of the cantilever. Von Mises, maximum principal and minimum principal stresses were analysed. Results The results indicated a tendency towards stress reduction in Von Mises stress values of dental implants with the increase in diameter for both mesial and distal implants. In narrow implants active thread design resulted in lower Von Mises stress values than passive thread design. Active thread design demonstrated higher bone stress when compared to passive thread design. The analysis also revealed the importance of mesial implant for diminishing stresses on the distal implant and their surrounding bone under horizontal and oblique loading. Conclusion The comparison of the models suggest that use of wide implant is advantageous in the all-on-four concept. There is a biomechanical advantage in using narrow implants with active thread design in horizontally inadequate bone. The thread design was more significant in terms of increasing bone stress than implant diameter. The mesial implant influences the biomechanical behavior of the whole design, contributing to a more favorable stress distribution under horizontal and oblique loading conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 108
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical Effects of Diameters of Implant Body and Implant Platform in Bone Strain around an Immediately Loaded Dental Implant with Platform Switching Concept
    Lung, Hsuan
    Hsu, Jui-Ting
    Wu, Aaron Yu-Jen
    Huang, Heng-Li
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [23] Photoelastic stress analysis of different thread designs of implant.
    Verayannont, P
    Namano, S
    Yongchareon, V
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 666 - 666
  • [24] Five years of radiographic evaluation for the peri-implant bone changes of all-on-four implant prostheses constructed from different framework materials using different digital construction techniques
    Mourad, Khloud Ezzat
    Rashed, Noha Hassan Atwa Hassan
    Altonbary, Gilan Youssef
    Hegazy, Salah Abdel Fattah
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [25] The All-on-Four Immediate Function Treatment Concept With NobelActive Implants: A Retrospective Study
    Babbush, Charles A.
    Kutsko, Gary T.
    Brokloff, John
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2011, 37 (04) : 431 - 445
  • [26] Stress Patterns Around Distal Angled Implants in the All-on-Four Concept Configuration
    Begg, Tasneem
    Geerts, Greta A. V. M.
    Gryzagoridis, Jasson
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2009, 24 (04) : 663 - 671
  • [27] All-on-four - Rehabilitation concept for the edentulous jaw: A clinical case cohort study on implant survival rates up to 5 years
    Stelzle, Florian
    Wachtel, Hannes
    Bolz, Wolfgang
    Niedermaier, Robert
    Schuh, Paul Leonhard
    Weiss, Michael
    Riemann, Max
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2015, 23 (04): : 421 - 431
  • [28] A Biomechanical Evaluation of Distal Tilting Implants in All-on-Four Rehabilitation with Mild Mandibular Resorption: A Finite Element Analysis Study
    Tsai, Ming-Hsu
    Lee, Chung-Han
    Wu, Aaron Yu-Jen
    Lei, Yao-Ning
    Chen, Hung-Shyong
    Wu, Yu-Ling
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (22)
  • [29] A New Approach to the All-on-Four Treatment Concept Using Narrow Platform NobelActive Implants
    Babbush, Charles A.
    Kanawati, Ali
    Brokloff, John
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2013, 39 (03) : 314 - 325
  • [30] Evaluation of Biomechanical and Stress Distribution of Different Dental Implant Designs: Primary Stability and Photoelastic Analysis
    Tardelli, J. D. C.
    Macedo, A. P.
    Valente, da Costa
    IRBM, 2022, 43 (02) : 100 - 106