Evaluation of biomechanical effects of different implant thread designs and diameters on all-on-four concept

被引:1
|
作者
Zor, Z. F. [1 ]
Kilinc, Y. [1 ]
Erkmen, E. [1 ]
Kurt, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Atilim Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
All-on-four; Dental implants; finite element analysis; Mandible; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; DIFFERENT FIXATION METHODS; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; ATROPHIC MAXILLA; BONE; LENGTH;
D O I
10.23805/JO.2021.13.03.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim All-on-four concept involves the use of four anterior dental implants in the edentulous jaw to overcome anatomic limitations of residual alveolar bone. The impact of implant thread design and diameter on the biomechanical performance of all-on-four concept is not yet fully understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of all-on-four concept with different combinations of thread designs and diameters through a three dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Materials and methods Six three-dimensional finite element models of edentulous mandible were developed. The models included the combinations of 3.5 and 4.3 mm diameter implants with active and passive thread designs. Vertical, oblique and horizontal loads were applied anterior to the end of the cantilever. Von Mises, maximum principal and minimum principal stresses were analysed. Results The results indicated a tendency towards stress reduction in Von Mises stress values of dental implants with the increase in diameter for both mesial and distal implants. In narrow implants active thread design resulted in lower Von Mises stress values than passive thread design. Active thread design demonstrated higher bone stress when compared to passive thread design. The analysis also revealed the importance of mesial implant for diminishing stresses on the distal implant and their surrounding bone under horizontal and oblique loading. Conclusion The comparison of the models suggest that use of wide implant is advantageous in the all-on-four concept. There is a biomechanical advantage in using narrow implants with active thread design in horizontally inadequate bone. The thread design was more significant in terms of increasing bone stress than implant diameter. The mesial implant influences the biomechanical behavior of the whole design, contributing to a more favorable stress distribution under horizontal and oblique loading conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 108
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs
    Karakasli, Ahmet
    Acar, Nihat
    Husemoglu, R. Bugra
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2021, 32 (01): : 192 - 197
  • [32] Biomechanical evaluation of four different mattresses
    DeVocht, JW
    Wilder, DG
    Bandstra, ER
    Spratt, KF
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03) : 297 - 304
  • [33] Electromyographic assessment of jaw muscles in patients with All-on-Four fixed implant-supported prostheses
    Dellavia, C.
    Francetti, L.
    Rosati, R.
    Corbella, S.
    Ferrario, V. F.
    Sforza, C.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 39 (12) : 896 - 904
  • [34] Biomechanical-Evaluation of Implant Thread Parameters under Poor Quality Bone
    Mao, Zhihong
    Zhou, Yulin
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 124 : 370 - 370
  • [35] Finite Element Stress Analysis of Applied Forces to Implants and Supporting Tissues Using the "All-on-Four" Concept with Different Occlusal Schemes
    Turker, Nurullah
    Buyukkaplan, Ulviye S.
    Sadowsky, Steven J.
    Ozarslan, Mehmet M.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (02): : 185 - 194
  • [36] Comparative Evaluation of Impression Accuracy of Tilted and Straight Implants in All-on-Four Technique
    Ehsani, Sara
    Siadat, Hakimeh
    Alikhasi, Marzieh
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (02) : 225 - 230
  • [37] A retrospective study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the 'all-on-four' or the 'all-on-six' immediate function concept using flapless computer-guided implant surgery
    Puig, Carmen Pomares
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2010, 3 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [38] Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals
    Soni, Romesh
    Yadav, Himanshi
    Pathak, Abhishek
    Bhatnagar, Atul
    Kumar, Vikram
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2020, 20 (03): : 312 - 320
  • [39] Application of the "All-on-Four" Concept and Guided Surgery in a Mandible Treated With a Free Vascularized Fibula Flap
    Nocini, Pier Francesco
    Albanese, Massimo
    Castellani, Roberto
    Zanotti, Guglielmo
    Canton, Luciano
    Bissolotti, Guido
    De Santis, Daniele
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (06) : E628 - E631
  • [40] Effect of Prosthetic Framework Material, Cantilever Length and Opposing Arch on Peri-Implant Strain in an All-on-Four Implant Prostheses
    Shetty, R.
    Singh, I
    Sumayli, H. A.
    Jafer, M. A.
    Feroz, S. M. Abdul
    Bhandi, S.
    Raj, A. T.
    Patil, S.
    Ferrari, M.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 24 (06) : 866 - 873