Construct validity in a high-fidelity prostate exam simulator

被引:17
|
作者
Kowalik, C. G. [2 ]
Gerling, G. J. [3 ]
Lee, A. J. [3 ]
Carson, W. C. [3 ]
Harper, J. [4 ,5 ]
Moskaluk, C. A. [4 ,5 ]
Krupski, T. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Urol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[2] Lahey Clin Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Syst & Informat Engn, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Dept Pathol, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Dept Biochem & Mol Genet, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
simulator; elasticity; digital rectal exam; construct validity; education; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; CANCER; STUDENTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2011.38
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: All health care practitioners should be facile in the digital rectal exam (DRE) as it provides prostate, rectal and neurological information. The purpose of this study was first to justify our hypothesis that tissue elasticity is indicative of carcinomatous changes. Second, we employed urological surgeons to evaluate our prostate simulator in three ways: (1) authenticate that the elasticity of the simulated prostates accurately represents the range of normal prostate stiffness, (2) determine the range of nodule size reasonably palpable by DRE and (3) discern what degree of elasticity difference within the same prostate suggests malignancy. METHODS: Institutional Review Board-approved materials characterization, human-subjects experiments, histopathology and chart abstraction of clinical history were performed. Material characterization of 21 ex-vivo prostatectomy specimens was evaluated using a custom-built, portable spherical indentation device while a novel prostate simulator was employed to measure human-subject perception of prostatic state. RESULTS: From the materials characterization, the measurements of the 21 gross prostates and 40 cross-sections yielded 306 data points. Within the same prostate, cancer was always stiffer. Of the seven cases with an abnormal DRE, the DRE accurately identified adenocarcinoma in 85%. From the human-subjects experiments, the simulated prostates evaluated by urologists ranged in stiffness from 8.9 to 91 kPa, mimicking the range found on ex vivo analysis of 4.6-236.7 kPa. The urological surgeons determined the upper limit of stiffness palpated as realistic for a healthy prostate was 59.63 kPa while the lower limit of stiffness was 27.1 kPa. Nodule size less than 7.5mm was felt to be too small to reasonably palpate. CONCLUSIONS: We found it is not the absolute elasticity of the nodule, but rather the relationship of the nodule with the background prostate elasticity that constitutes the critical tactile feedback. Prostate simulator training may lead to greater familiarity with pertinent diagnostic cues and diagnosis of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Erasure conversion in a high-fidelity Rydberg quantum simulator
    Pascal Scholl
    Adam L. Shaw
    Richard Bing-Shiun Tsai
    Ran Finkelstein
    Joonhee Choi
    Manuel Endres
    Nature, 2023, 622 : 273 - 278
  • [22] Evaluation and Implementation of a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator
    Podolsky, Dale J.
    Fisher, David M.
    Wong, Karen W.
    Looi, Thomas
    Drake, James M.
    Forrest, Christopher R.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (01) : 85E - 96E
  • [23] Airway Anatomy of AirSim High-fidelity Simulator Reply
    Schebesta, Karl
    Kimberger, Oliver
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 118 (01) : 229 - 230
  • [24] Content Validity of a High-Fidelity Surgical Middle Ear Simulator: A Randomized Prospective International Multicenter Trial
    Youner, Emily R.
    Chillakuru, Yeshwant R.
    Xu, Helen
    Dedmon, Matthew
    Labadie, Robert
    Djalilian, Hamid
    Mahboubi, Hossein
    Westerberg, Brian
    Vaisbuch, Yona
    Blevins, Nikolas
    Chen, Joseph
    Lin, Vincent
    Joyce, Morgan G.
    Moncada, Paola X.
    Dabiri, Sasan
    Gurgel, Richard K.
    Kouhi, Ali
    Monfared, Ashkan S.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2023, 44 (09) : 903 - 911
  • [25] Validity and fidelity of the upper airway in two high-fidelity patient simulators
    Schebesta, K.
    Spreitzgrabner, G.
    Hoerner, E.
    Huepfl, M.
    Kimberger, O.
    Roessler, B.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2015, 81 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [26] Construct validity of endoloop task on LAP Mentor™; a high fidelity, virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator
    Sharma, M.
    Horgan, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 180 - 181
  • [27] Validity condition for high-fidelity digitized quantum annealing
    Santos, Alan C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2025, 111 (02)
  • [28] Effectiveness of Lung Ultrasound Training Utilizing a High-Fidelity Simulator
    Takeda, Kenichiro
    Kasai, Hajime
    Tajima, Hiroshi
    Hayama, Nami
    Saito, Mikihito
    Kawame, Chiaki
    Suzuki, Takuji
    ATS SCHOLAR, 2024, 5 (01): : 133 - 141
  • [29] Teaching Palatoplasty Using a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator
    Cheng, Homan
    Podolsky, Dale J.
    Fisher, David M.
    Wong, Karen W.
    Lorenz, H. Peter
    Khosla, Rohit K.
    Drake, James M.
    Forrest, Christopher R.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (01) : 91E - 98E
  • [30] Development and Validation of a High-Fidelity Porcine Laryngeal Surgical Simulator
    Dedmon, Matthew M.
    Paddle, Paul M.
    Phillips, Jeananne
    Kobayashi, Leo
    Franco, Ramon A.
    Song, Phillip C.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 153 (03) : 420 - 426