Construct validity in a high-fidelity prostate exam simulator

被引:17
|
作者
Kowalik, C. G. [2 ]
Gerling, G. J. [3 ]
Lee, A. J. [3 ]
Carson, W. C. [3 ]
Harper, J. [4 ,5 ]
Moskaluk, C. A. [4 ,5 ]
Krupski, T. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Urol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[2] Lahey Clin Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Syst & Informat Engn, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Dept Pathol, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Dept Biochem & Mol Genet, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
simulator; elasticity; digital rectal exam; construct validity; education; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; CANCER; STUDENTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2011.38
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: All health care practitioners should be facile in the digital rectal exam (DRE) as it provides prostate, rectal and neurological information. The purpose of this study was first to justify our hypothesis that tissue elasticity is indicative of carcinomatous changes. Second, we employed urological surgeons to evaluate our prostate simulator in three ways: (1) authenticate that the elasticity of the simulated prostates accurately represents the range of normal prostate stiffness, (2) determine the range of nodule size reasonably palpable by DRE and (3) discern what degree of elasticity difference within the same prostate suggests malignancy. METHODS: Institutional Review Board-approved materials characterization, human-subjects experiments, histopathology and chart abstraction of clinical history were performed. Material characterization of 21 ex-vivo prostatectomy specimens was evaluated using a custom-built, portable spherical indentation device while a novel prostate simulator was employed to measure human-subject perception of prostatic state. RESULTS: From the materials characterization, the measurements of the 21 gross prostates and 40 cross-sections yielded 306 data points. Within the same prostate, cancer was always stiffer. Of the seven cases with an abnormal DRE, the DRE accurately identified adenocarcinoma in 85%. From the human-subjects experiments, the simulated prostates evaluated by urologists ranged in stiffness from 8.9 to 91 kPa, mimicking the range found on ex vivo analysis of 4.6-236.7 kPa. The urological surgeons determined the upper limit of stiffness palpated as realistic for a healthy prostate was 59.63 kPa while the lower limit of stiffness was 27.1 kPa. Nodule size less than 7.5mm was felt to be too small to reasonably palpate. CONCLUSIONS: We found it is not the absolute elasticity of the nodule, but rather the relationship of the nodule with the background prostate elasticity that constitutes the critical tactile feedback. Prostate simulator training may lead to greater familiarity with pertinent diagnostic cues and diagnosis of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Construct validity in a high-fidelity prostate exam simulator
    C G Kowalik
    G J Gerling
    A J Lee
    W C Carson
    J Harper
    C A Moskaluk
    T L Krupski
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2012, 15 : 63 - 69
  • [2] FACE, CONTENT, AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE IDEAL ADULT URETEROSCOPY TRAINER: A HIGH-FIDELITY URETEROSCOPY AND RENOSCOPY SIMULATOR
    White, Michael A.
    DeHaan, Alex P.
    Stephens, Doyle D.
    Kahnoski, Richard J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 792 - 793
  • [3] Prototype of High-Fidelity ECMO Simulator
    Puslecki, Mateusz
    Kiel, Michal
    Ligowski, Marcin
    Dabrowski, Marek
    Stefaniak, Sebastian
    Gasiorowski, Lukasz
    Dabrowska, Agata
    Klosiewicz, Tomasz
    Sip, Maciej
    Telec, Wojciech
    Karczewski, Marek
    Ziemak, Piotr
    Perek, Bartlomiej
    Ladzinska, Malgorzata
    Misterski, Marcin
    Urbanowicz, Tomasz
    Stachowiak, Wojciech
    Buczkowski, Piotr
    Czekajlo, Michael
    Jemielity, Marek
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 : 66 - 67
  • [4] High-fidelity simulation training for the primary exam
    Harvey, R.
    Gillan, C.
    Edgar, S.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (08) : 882 - 882
  • [5] Clinical testing of a high-fidelity epidural simulator
    Richmond, L.
    Clark, J.
    Francis, J.
    Short, A.
    Waters, M.
    Jenkins, B.
    Hall, J.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 : 19 - 19
  • [6] Development and Evaluation of a High-Fidelity Rhinoplasty Simulator
    Podolsky, Dale J.
    Murphy, Blake D.
    Ahmad, Jamil
    Fisher, David M.
    Riff, Karen W. Y. Wong
    Drake, James M.
    Forrest, Christopher R.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 153 (03) : 619 - 622
  • [7] Novel High-Fidelity Peritonsillar Abscess Simulator
    Scott, Grace M.
    Fung, Kevin
    Roth, Kathryn E.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2016, 154 (04) : 634 - 637
  • [8] Airway Anatomy of AirSim High-fidelity Simulator
    Jelacic, Srdjan
    Ghioni, Victor
    Bowdle, Andrew
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 118 (01) : 228 - 229
  • [9] Development of a high-fidelity CLARREO Pathfinder simulator
    Wu, Wan
    Liu, Xu
    Yang, Qiguang
    Goldin, Daniel
    Shea, Yolanda L.
    Currey, Jon C.
    Bartle, Aron
    Lukashin, Constantine
    IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2020, : 6385 - 6388
  • [10] The relationship between simulator sickness and driving performance in a high-fidelity simulator
    Igoshina, Elizaveta
    Russo, Frank A.
    Shewaga, Robert
    Haycock, Bruce
    Keshavarz, Behrang
    Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2022, 89 : 478 - 487