Preoperative assessment of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography of diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy: Correlation to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 5-year postoperative follow-up

被引:15
|
作者
Cheung, Yun-Chung [1 ,2 ]
Juan, Yu-Hsiang [1 ,2 ]
Lo, Yung-Feng [3 ]
Lin, Yu-Ching [1 ,2 ]
Yeh, Chih-Hua [1 ,4 ]
Ueng, Shir-Hwa [5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Radiol Sci, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Clin Informat & Med Stat Res Ctr, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Dept Pathol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; MULTICENTRICITY; MRI;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000019024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess the feasibility of using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for operative planning of patients with breast cancers who were initially diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy.With the approval of the Institutional Review Board of our hospital, we retrospectively reviewed the data on patients with breast cancers who underwent CESM and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) prior to operation and were followed up for at least 5 years postoperatively. The patients with breast cancer diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy without mammography were included for analysis. The size and number of cancers on low-energy mammograms (LE-MG), recombined subtracted mammograms (RSM), and CE-MRI were recorded and compared with microscopic histopathologic data and at least 5 years of clinical follow-up data.Fifty-one cancerous breasts of 46 patients were included in the analysis. All the principal cancers could be detected by RSM or CE-MRI; however, only 45 were by LE-MG. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the size on microscopy were 0.44 for LE-MG, 0.77 for RSM, and 0.84 for CE-MRI (all P-values <=.001). Regarding the microscopic reports, RSM or CE-MRI had sensitivities of 100% and a positive predictive value of 63.6% for multicentric cancers. One breast cancer with partial mastectomy recurred after 3 years of follow-up.CESM was feasible for assessing the cancer extension and multicentric cancers as secondary examination in patients with diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correlation between estimates of tumor perfusion from microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Yankeelov, TE
    Niermann, KJ
    Huamani, J
    Kim, DW
    Quarles, CC
    Fleischer, AC
    Hallahan, DE
    Price, RR
    Gore, JC
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (04) : 487 - 497
  • [42] Prediction of Underestimation Using Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Patients Diagnosed as Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Preoperative Core Biopsy
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Park, Seo Young
    Ahn, Sei Hyun
    Son, Byung Ho
    Chung, Il Yong
    Lee, Jong Won
    Ko, Beom Seok
    Kim, Ji Sun
    Chae, Eun Young
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Hak Hee
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2022, 22 (03) : E374 - E386
  • [43] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions
    Li, L.
    Roth, R.
    Germaine, P.
    Ren, S.
    Lee, M.
    Hunter, K.
    Tinney, E.
    Liao, L.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (02) : 113 - 123
  • [44] Assessment of the dynamic range in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging breast examinations
    Ledger, A. E. W.
    Borri, M.
    Schmidt, M.
    Pope, R.
    Scurr, E.
    Wallace, T.
    Richardson, C.
    Usher, M.
    Allen, S.
    Wilson, R.
    Thomas, K.
    deSouza, N.
    Leach, M. O.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14
  • [45] Contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging: the surgical perspective - Discussion
    Clyde, J. Courtney
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (05): : 605 - 605
  • [46] Assessment of the dynamic range in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging breast examinations
    AEW Ledger
    M Borri
    M Schmidt
    R Pope
    E Scurr
    T Wallace
    C Richardson
    M Usher
    S Allen
    R Wilson
    K Thomas
    N deSouza
    MO Leach
    Breast Cancer Research, 14
  • [47] Accuracy of conventional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the size of breast cancer
    Shi, Xian-Quan
    Dong, Yunyun
    Tan, Xiaoqu
    Yang, Peipei
    Wang, Chunmei
    Feng, Wei
    Lin, Yuxuan
    Qian, Linxue
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2022, 82 (02) : 157 - 168
  • [48] THE VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE CONTRAST-ENHANCED BREAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING ON SURGICAL PLANNING IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
    Sever, Ali
    Kayhan, Arda
    Cimsit, Cagatay
    Kaya, Handan
    Gulluoglu, Bahadir
    Aribal, Erkin
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2012, 8 (01): : 11 - 18
  • [49] Early assessment of myocardial salvage by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Hillenbrand, HB
    Kim, RJ
    Parker, MA
    Fieno, DS
    Judd, RM
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (14) : 1678 - 1683
  • [50] Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction and viability
    Saraste, Antti
    Nekolla, Stephan
    Schwaiger, Markus
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (01) : 105 - 117