Preoperative assessment of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography of diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy: Correlation to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 5-year postoperative follow-up

被引:15
|
作者
Cheung, Yun-Chung [1 ,2 ]
Juan, Yu-Hsiang [1 ,2 ]
Lo, Yung-Feng [3 ]
Lin, Yu-Ching [1 ,2 ]
Yeh, Chih-Hua [1 ,4 ]
Ueng, Shir-Hwa [5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Radiol Sci, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Clin Informat & Med Stat Res Ctr, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Dept Pathol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; MULTICENTRICITY; MRI;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000019024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess the feasibility of using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for operative planning of patients with breast cancers who were initially diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy.With the approval of the Institutional Review Board of our hospital, we retrospectively reviewed the data on patients with breast cancers who underwent CESM and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) prior to operation and were followed up for at least 5 years postoperatively. The patients with breast cancer diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy without mammography were included for analysis. The size and number of cancers on low-energy mammograms (LE-MG), recombined subtracted mammograms (RSM), and CE-MRI were recorded and compared with microscopic histopathologic data and at least 5 years of clinical follow-up data.Fifty-one cancerous breasts of 46 patients were included in the analysis. All the principal cancers could be detected by RSM or CE-MRI; however, only 45 were by LE-MG. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the size on microscopy were 0.44 for LE-MG, 0.77 for RSM, and 0.84 for CE-MRI (all P-values <=.001). Regarding the microscopic reports, RSM or CE-MRI had sensitivities of 100% and a positive predictive value of 63.6% for multicentric cancers. One breast cancer with partial mastectomy recurred after 3 years of follow-up.CESM was feasible for assessing the cancer extension and multicentric cancers as secondary examination in patients with diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Can Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Reduce Benign Breast Biopsy?
    Liew, Amanda Ling Fung
    Lim, Hollie Mei Yeen
    Fok, Elizabeth Chun Mei
    Loke, Siu Cheng
    Tan, Ern Yu
    Chong, Bee Kiang
    Lee, Yeong Shyan
    Chan, Patrick Mun Yew
    Chotai, Niketa
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2022, 2022 : 7087408
  • [22] Locoregional staging of breast cancer: contrast-enhanced mammography versus breast magnetic resonance imaging
    Terzoni, Andrea
    Basile, Paola
    Gambaro, Anna Clelia
    Attanasio, Silvia
    Rampi, Anna Maria
    Brambilla, Marco
    Carriero, Alessandro
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (04): : 558 - 565
  • [23] Locoregional staging of breast cancer: contrast-enhanced mammography versus breast magnetic resonance imaging
    Andrea Terzoni
    Paola Basile
    Anna Clelia Gambaro
    Silvia Attanasio
    Anna Maria Rampi
    Marco Brambilla
    Alessandro Carriero
    La radiologia medica, 2024, 129 : 558 - 565
  • [24] DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE MAMMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF THE BREAST AFTER SURGERY
    DREW, PJ
    TURNBULL, LW
    KERSLAKE, RW
    BUCKLEY, DL
    FOX, JN
    CARLETON, PJ
    BOWSLEY, S
    HORSMAN, A
    MONSON, JRT
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (12) : 1811 - 1811
  • [25] Magnetic resonance in mammography: A quantitative evaluation tool of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance of the breast
    Univ of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    IEE Conference Publication, 2000, (476): : 200 - 205
  • [26] Magnetic resonance in mammography: A quantitative evaluation tool of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance of the breast
    Starita, A
    La Manna, S
    Majidi, D
    Caramella, D
    Cilotti, A
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2000, (476): : 200 - 205
  • [27] Vascularity and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Frankhouser, David E.
    Dietze, Eric
    Mahabal, Ashish
    Seewaldt, Victoria L.
    FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 1
  • [28] Contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging: the surgical perspective
    Beatty, J. David
    Porter, Bruce A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (05): : 600 - 605
  • [29] Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging combined with contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the follow-up of immunogene-treated glioblastoma multiforme
    Stenberg, L.
    Englund, E.
    Wirestam, R.
    Siesjo, P.
    Salford, L. G.
    Larsson, E. -M.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2006, 47 (08) : 852 - 861
  • [30] THE INDETERMINATE BREAST MASS - ASSESSMENT CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    HICKMAN, PF
    MOORE, NR
    SHEPSTONE, BJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (793): : 14 - 20