Preoperative assessment of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography of diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy: Correlation to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 5-year postoperative follow-up

被引:15
|
作者
Cheung, Yun-Chung [1 ,2 ]
Juan, Yu-Hsiang [1 ,2 ]
Lo, Yung-Feng [3 ]
Lin, Yu-Ching [1 ,2 ]
Yeh, Chih-Hua [1 ,4 ]
Ueng, Shir-Hwa [5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Radiol Sci, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Clin Informat & Med Stat Res Ctr, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Dept Pathol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; MULTICENTRICITY; MRI;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000019024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess the feasibility of using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for operative planning of patients with breast cancers who were initially diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy.With the approval of the Institutional Review Board of our hospital, we retrospectively reviewed the data on patients with breast cancers who underwent CESM and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) prior to operation and were followed up for at least 5 years postoperatively. The patients with breast cancer diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy without mammography were included for analysis. The size and number of cancers on low-energy mammograms (LE-MG), recombined subtracted mammograms (RSM), and CE-MRI were recorded and compared with microscopic histopathologic data and at least 5 years of clinical follow-up data.Fifty-one cancerous breasts of 46 patients were included in the analysis. All the principal cancers could be detected by RSM or CE-MRI; however, only 45 were by LE-MG. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the size on microscopy were 0.44 for LE-MG, 0.77 for RSM, and 0.84 for CE-MRI (all P-values <=.001). Regarding the microscopic reports, RSM or CE-MRI had sensitivities of 100% and a positive predictive value of 63.6% for multicentric cancers. One breast cancer with partial mastectomy recurred after 3 years of follow-up.CESM was feasible for assessing the cancer extension and multicentric cancers as secondary examination in patients with diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Preoperative Imaging in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Schaverien, Mark V.
    Ludman, Catherine N.
    Neil-Dwyer, Jason
    Perks, Graeme B.
    Akhtar, Nadeem
    Rodrigues, Jeremy N.
    Benetatos, Konstantinos
    Raurell, Anna
    Rasheed, Tuabin
    McCulley, Stephen J.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [32] Assessment of Bone Perfusion with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lee, Jonathan H.
    Dyke, Jonathan P.
    Ballon, Douglas
    Ciornbor, Deborah McK.
    Tung, Glenn
    Aaron, Roy K.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 40 (02) : 249 - +
  • [34] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for head and neck cancers
    Elhalawani, Hesham
    Ger, Rachel B.
    Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
    Awan, Musaddiq J.
    Ding, Yao
    Li, Kimberly
    Fave, Xenia J.
    Beers, Andrew L.
    Driscoll, Brandon
    Hormuth, David A., II
    van Houdt, Petra J.
    He, Renjie
    Zhou, Shouhao
    Mathieu, Kelsey B.
    Li, Heng
    Coolens, Catherine
    Chung, Caroline
    Bankson, James A.
    Huang, Wei
    Wang, Jihong
    Sandulache, Vlad C.
    Lai, Stephen Y.
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Stafford, R. Jason
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Barboriak, Daniel P.
    Hazle, John D.
    Court, Laurence E.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2018, 5
  • [35] Workflow Considerations for Incorporation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Into a Breast Imaging Practice
    Phillips, Jordana
    Steinkeler, Jennifer
    Talati, Komal
    Brook, Alexander
    Dialani, Vandana
    Fishman, Michael
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    Mehta, Tejas S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (06) : 881 - 885
  • [36] Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Importance of the Assessment of Breast Tumor Size Response
    Lu, Zhongfei
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (03) : 491 - 491
  • [37] Sonographic-pathological correlation in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancers.
    Kato, K.
    Miyamoto, Y.
    Kamio, M.
    Nogi, H.
    Imawari, Y.
    Mimoto, R.
    Toriumi, Y.
    Nakata, N.
    Takeyama, H.
    Uchida, K.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [38] Comparison Between Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Resectability Assessment in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Yoo, Jeongin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 24 (10) : 983 - 995
  • [39] Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
    Jia, Wan-Ru
    Tang, Lei
    Wang, Deng-Bin
    Chai, Wei-Min
    Fei, Xiao-Chun
    He, Jian-Rong
    Chen, Man
    Wang, Wen-Ping
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [40] Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
    Wan-Ru Jia
    Lei Tang
    Deng-Bin Wang
    Wei-Min Chai
    Xiao-Chun Fei
    Jian-Rong He
    Man Chen
    Wen-Ping Wang
    Scientific Reports, 6