Effects of the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil Versus Olmesartan and Valsartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stages 1 and 2 Hypertension

被引:177
|
作者
White, William B. [1 ]
Weber, Michael A. [2 ]
Sica, Domenic [3 ]
Bakris, George L. [4 ]
Perez, Alfonso [5 ]
Cao, Charlie [5 ]
Kupfer, Stuart [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Div Hypertens & Clin Pharmacol, Calhoun Cardiol Ctr, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[2] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Takeda Global Res & Dev, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; angiotensin receptor blockers; azilsartan medoxomil; clinical trial; olmesartan; valsartan; LONG-TERM REPRODUCIBILITY; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; LOSARTAN; HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; TELMISARTAN; COMBINATION; REDUCTION; MORTALITY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Azilsartan medoxomil is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) being developed for hypertension treatment. To compare this ARB with others in the class, we studied the effects of 2 doses of azilsartan medoxomil, with valsartan 320 mg and olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan) 40 mg, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and clinic BP measurements. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in 24-hour mean systolic BP. Hierarchical analysis testing for superiority over placebo was followed by noninferiority analysis and then superiority testing of azilsartan medoxomil (80 mg and then 40 mg) versus the comparator ARBs. For 1291 randomized patients, mean age was 56 years, 54% were men, and baseline 24-hour mean systolic BP was 145 mm Hg. Azilsartan medoxomil at 80 mg had superior efficacy to both valsartan at 320 mg and olmesartan at 40 mg: placebo-adjusted 24-hour systolic BP was lowered (-14.3 mm Hg) more than 320 mg of valsartan (-10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and 40 mg of olmesartan (-11.7 mm Hg; P=0.009). Azilsartan medoxomil at 40 mg was noninferior to 40 mg of olmesartan (difference: -1.4 mm Hg [95% CI: -3.3 to 0.5]). For clinic systolic BP, both doses of azilsartan medoxomil were superior to the comparator ARBs. Safety and tolerability were similar among the placebo and 4 active treatments. These data demonstrate that azilsartan medoxomil at its maximal dose has superior efficacy to both olmesartan and valsartan at their maximal, approved doses without increasing adverse events. Azilsartan medoxomil could provide higher rates of hypertension control within the ARB class. (Hypertension. 2011;57:413-420.). Online Data Supplement
引用
收藏
页码:413 / U150
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of azilsartan medoxomil compared with olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes
    White, William B.
    Cuadra, Rene H.
    Lloyd, Eric
    Bakris, George L.
    Kupfer, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 (04) : 788 - 797
  • [2] The Comparative Effects of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Olmesartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure
    Bakris, George L.
    Sica, Domenic
    Weber, Michael
    White, William B.
    Roberts, Andrew
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Kupfer, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2011, 13 (02): : 81 - 88
  • [3] Comparison of the Novel Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Valsartan by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
    Sica, Domenic
    White, William B.
    Weber, Michael A.
    Bakris, George L.
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Handley, Alison
    Kupfer, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2011, 13 (07): : 467 - 472
  • [4] EFFECTS OF AZILSARTAN MEDOXOMIL VERSUS VALSARTAN AND OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL ON THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE GOALS AMONG HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH DIABETES
    Sussman, M.
    Leahy, M.
    Friedman, M.
    Menzin, J.
    Nichols, C.
    Neumann, P.
    Sullivan, S. D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A36 - A36
  • [5] THE NEW ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKER AZILSARTAN MEDOXOMIL HAS SIGNIFICANTLY GREATER 24-HOUR BLOOD PRESSURE LOWERING EFFICACY TO BOTH OLMESARTAN AND VALSARTAN
    White, W.
    Weber, M.
    Sica, D.
    Bakris, G.
    Perez, A.
    Cao, C.
    Kupfer, S.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2010, 28 : E442 - E442
  • [6] Blood pressure responses to dose titration of the angiotensin receptor blocker olmesartan medoxomil in essential hypertension
    Izzo, JL
    Wingertzahn, MA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 16 (05) : 119A - 119A
  • [7] RESULTS OF A NOVEL ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKER, AZILSARTAN MEDOXOMIL, IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY HYPERTENSION
    Bakris, G.
    Sica, D.
    Weber, M.
    White, W. B.
    Perez, A.
    Cao, C.
    Kupfer, S.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2010, 28 : E429 - E429
  • [8] Clinical effects of combined olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine on clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in elderly patients with resistant hypertension
    Ding, Shunjing
    Liu, Jin
    Fu, Qiang
    Zheng, Ying
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2013, 57 (03) : 423 - 427
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil, an angiotensin receptor blocker, in Korean patients with essential hypertension
    Juhasz A.
    Wu J.
    Hisada M.
    Tsukada T.
    Jeong M.H.
    Clinical Hypertension, 24 (1)
  • [10] Evaluation of the angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil in African-American patients with hypertension
    Johnson, Wallace
    White, William B.
    Sica, Domenic
    Bakris, George L.
    Weber, Michael A.
    Handley, Alison
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Kupfer, Stuart
    Saunders, Elijah B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2017, 19 (07): : 695 - 701