Effects of azilsartan medoxomil compared with olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes

被引:27
|
作者
White, William B. [1 ]
Cuadra, Rene H. [1 ]
Lloyd, Eric [2 ]
Bakris, George L. [3 ]
Kupfer, Stuart [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Calhoun Cardiol Ctr, Div Hypertens & Clin Pharmacol, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[2] Takeda Dev Ctr, Clin Sci, Deerfield, IL USA
[3] Univ Chicago Med, ASH Comprehens Hypertens Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; angiotensin receptor blockers; azilsartan medoxomil; prediabetes; type; 2; diabetes; RECEPTOR BLOCKER; GLUCOSE; TELMISARTAN; DISEASE; RISK; HYPERTENSION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0000000000000839
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background:Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are preferred antihypertensive therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is a potent ARB for the treatment of stages 1-2 hypertension. We compared the efficacy, safety, and metabolic effects of AZL-M to both valsartan (VAL) and olmesartan (OLM), separately in patients with impaired fasting glucose (prediabetes mellitus) and T2DM.Methods:A pooled analysis of 3821 patients from three separate randomized placebo-controlled trials comparing the effects of AZL-M (40 and 80mg), OLM (40mg), VAL (320mg), and placebo on changes in ambulatory and clinic blood pressure (BP) among patients with hypertension and prediabetes mellitus or T2DM was performed. Two analysis pools were created to facilitate comparisons: Pool A included patients who received placebo, AZL-M or OLM and Pool B included those who received AZL-M or VAL. Within each pool, patients were stratified by glycemic subgroups (normoglycemic, prediabetes mellitus, or T2DM) based on hemoglobin A1c values. Changes from baseline in both 24-h and clinic SBP were the primary efficacy assessments.Results:Baseline 24-h mean SBPs were approximately 145 and 146mmHg in the prediabetes mellitus and T2DM subgroups, respectively; corresponding clinic SBPs were approximately 158 and 159mmHg. Baseline hemoglobin A1c values for each subgroup (both pools) were normoglycemic, 5.3%; prediabetes mellitus, 6.0%; and T2DM, 6.9%. Changes from baseline in 24-h or clinic SBP were significantly greater with AZL-M, 80mg compared with either OLM 40mg or VAL 320mg in all subgroups in each pool. Safety and tolerability were similar among the active treatment and placebo subgroups.Conclusion:These analyses indicate that AZL-M, 80mg/day lowers SBP by a greater magnitude than OLM or VAL at maximally approved doses in patients with prediabetes mellitus and T2DM. These findings have important clinical implications for this high-risk patient group.
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 797
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Comparative Effects of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Olmesartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure
    Bakris, George L.
    Sica, Domenic
    Weber, Michael
    White, William B.
    Roberts, Andrew
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Kupfer, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2011, 13 (02): : 81 - 88
  • [2] Effects of the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil Versus Olmesartan and Valsartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stages 1 and 2 Hypertension
    White, William B.
    Weber, Michael A.
    Sica, Domenic
    Bakris, George L.
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Kupfer, Stuart
    HYPERTENSION, 2011, 57 (03) : 413 - U150
  • [3] EFFECTS OF AZILSARTAN MEDOXOMIL VERSUS VALSARTAN AND OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL ON THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE GOALS AMONG HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH DIABETES
    Sussman, M.
    Leahy, M.
    Friedman, M.
    Menzin, J.
    Nichols, C.
    Neumann, P.
    Sullivan, S. D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A36 - A36
  • [4] Clinical effects of combined olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine on clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in elderly patients with resistant hypertension
    Ding, Shunjing
    Liu, Jin
    Fu, Qiang
    Zheng, Ying
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2013, 57 (03) : 423 - 427
  • [5] Comparison of the Novel Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Valsartan by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
    Sica, Domenic
    White, William B.
    Weber, Michael A.
    Bakris, George L.
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Handley, Alison
    Kupfer, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2011, 13 (07): : 467 - 472
  • [6] EFFECTS OF AZILSARTAN MEDOXOMIL ON CENTRAL AORTIC AND AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION
    Dobrokhod, A.
    Sirenko, Y.
    Zhyvilo, I.
    Torbas, O.
    Kushnir, S.
    Granich, V.
    Primac, G.
    Polishchuk, S.
    Sidorenko, P.
    Rekovets, O.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 : E116 - E117
  • [7] Effects of an olmesartan medoxomil based treatment algorithm on 24-hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes
    Neutel, Joel M.
    Kereiakes, Dean J.
    Waverczak, William F.
    Stoakes, Kathy A.
    Xu, Jianbo
    Shojaee, Ali
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (03) : 721 - 728
  • [8] INFLUENCE OF AZILSARTAN MEDOXOMIL ON CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE AND AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION
    Dobrokhod, Anna
    Sirenko, Yuriy
    Zhivilo, Irina
    Torbas, Olena
    Granich, Vladimir
    Radchenko, Anna
    Primac, Galina
    Sydorenko, Piotr
    Polishchuk, Sergey
    Kushnir, Svetlana
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 : E444 - E444
  • [9] Long-Term Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Chinese Hypertensive Patients as Assessed by Clinic, Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Measurements
    Wang, Ji-Guang
    Sun, Ning-Ling
    Ke, Yuan-Nan
    Zhang, Bo-Heng
    Ikegami, Naotaka
    Zhu, Jun-Ren
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2012, 32 (11) : 729 - 734
  • [10] Long-Term Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Chinese Hypertensive Patients as Assessed by Clinic, Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Measurements
    Ji-Guang Wang
    Ning-Ling Sun
    Yuan-Nan Ke
    Bo-Heng Zhang
    Naotaka Ikegami
    Jun-Ren Zhu
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2012, 32 : 729 - 734