Effects of the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil Versus Olmesartan and Valsartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stages 1 and 2 Hypertension

被引:177
|
作者
White, William B. [1 ]
Weber, Michael A. [2 ]
Sica, Domenic [3 ]
Bakris, George L. [4 ]
Perez, Alfonso [5 ]
Cao, Charlie [5 ]
Kupfer, Stuart [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Div Hypertens & Clin Pharmacol, Calhoun Cardiol Ctr, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[2] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Takeda Global Res & Dev, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; angiotensin receptor blockers; azilsartan medoxomil; clinical trial; olmesartan; valsartan; LONG-TERM REPRODUCIBILITY; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; LOSARTAN; HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; TELMISARTAN; COMBINATION; REDUCTION; MORTALITY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Azilsartan medoxomil is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) being developed for hypertension treatment. To compare this ARB with others in the class, we studied the effects of 2 doses of azilsartan medoxomil, with valsartan 320 mg and olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan) 40 mg, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and clinic BP measurements. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in 24-hour mean systolic BP. Hierarchical analysis testing for superiority over placebo was followed by noninferiority analysis and then superiority testing of azilsartan medoxomil (80 mg and then 40 mg) versus the comparator ARBs. For 1291 randomized patients, mean age was 56 years, 54% were men, and baseline 24-hour mean systolic BP was 145 mm Hg. Azilsartan medoxomil at 80 mg had superior efficacy to both valsartan at 320 mg and olmesartan at 40 mg: placebo-adjusted 24-hour systolic BP was lowered (-14.3 mm Hg) more than 320 mg of valsartan (-10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and 40 mg of olmesartan (-11.7 mm Hg; P=0.009). Azilsartan medoxomil at 40 mg was noninferior to 40 mg of olmesartan (difference: -1.4 mm Hg [95% CI: -3.3 to 0.5]). For clinic systolic BP, both doses of azilsartan medoxomil were superior to the comparator ARBs. Safety and tolerability were similar among the placebo and 4 active treatments. These data demonstrate that azilsartan medoxomil at its maximal dose has superior efficacy to both olmesartan and valsartan at their maximal, approved doses without increasing adverse events. Azilsartan medoxomil could provide higher rates of hypertension control within the ARB class. (Hypertension. 2011;57:413-420.). Online Data Supplement
引用
收藏
页码:413 / U150
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Administration-Time-Dependent Effects of Olmesartan on the Ambulatory Blood Pressure of Essential Hypertension Patients
    Hermida, Ramon C.
    Ayala, Diana E.
    Chayan, Luisa
    Mojon, Artemio
    Fernandez, Jose R.
    CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 26 (01) : 61 - 79
  • [42] Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with essential hypertension
    Brunner, HR
    Stumpe, KO
    Januszewicz, A
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2003, 23 (07) : 419 - 430
  • [43] Blood pressure-lowering effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker, olmesartan medoxomil, and its relationship with the plasma renin activity and urinary Na excretion rate in hypertensive patients
    Onai, Yasuyuki
    Iwata, Osamu
    Okahara, Masaharu
    Kaneko, Masaru
    Tanigawara, Yusuke
    Kuramoto, Kizuku
    Arakawa, Kikuo
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2006, 24 : 250 - 250
  • [44] Effects of telmisartan and amlodipine in combination on ambulatory blood pressure in stages 1-2 hypertension
    White, William B.
    Littlejohn, Thomas W.
    Majul, Claudio R.
    Oigman, Willie
    Olvera, Rafael
    Seeber, Mary
    Schumacher, Helmut
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2010, 15 (04) : 205 - 212
  • [45] Effects of an olmesartan medoxomil based treatment algorithm on 24-hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes
    Neutel, Joel M.
    Kereiakes, Dean J.
    Waverczak, William F.
    Stoakes, Kathy A.
    Xu, Jianbo
    Shojaee, Ali
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (03) : 721 - 728
  • [46] Interaction of alcohol and an α1-blocker on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension
    Kawano, Y
    Abe, H
    Kojima, S
    Takishita, S
    Omae, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 13 (03) : 307 - 312
  • [47] Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study
    Lacourciere, Yves
    Wright, Jackson T., Jr.
    Samuel, Rita
    Zappe, Dion
    Purkayastha, Das
    Black, Henry R.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2009, 14 (03) : 112 - 120
  • [48] Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Wang, Ji-Guang
    Zhang, Miao
    Feng, Ying-Qing
    Ma, Chang-Sheng
    Wang, Tzung-Dau
    Zhu, Zhi-Ming
    Kario, Kazuomi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2021, 23 (05): : 901 - 914
  • [49] Effects of morning versus evening administration of valsartan on ambulatory blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients
    Calvo, C
    Hermida, RC
    Ayala, DE
    Lopez, JE
    Dominguez, MJ
    Mojon, A
    Fernandez, JR
    Covelo, M
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 22 : S382 - S382
  • [50] AZILSARTAN MEDOXOMIL PROPORTIONALLY DECREASES CENTRAL AND BRACHIAL 24-H AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE IN DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH DIFFICULT-TO-CONTROL ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
    Starostina, E.
    Kotovskaya, Y.
    Kobalava, Z.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 : E143 - E143