Effects of the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil Versus Olmesartan and Valsartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stages 1 and 2 Hypertension

被引:177
|
作者
White, William B. [1 ]
Weber, Michael A. [2 ]
Sica, Domenic [3 ]
Bakris, George L. [4 ]
Perez, Alfonso [5 ]
Cao, Charlie [5 ]
Kupfer, Stuart [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Div Hypertens & Clin Pharmacol, Calhoun Cardiol Ctr, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[2] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Takeda Global Res & Dev, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; angiotensin receptor blockers; azilsartan medoxomil; clinical trial; olmesartan; valsartan; LONG-TERM REPRODUCIBILITY; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; LOSARTAN; HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; TELMISARTAN; COMBINATION; REDUCTION; MORTALITY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Azilsartan medoxomil is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) being developed for hypertension treatment. To compare this ARB with others in the class, we studied the effects of 2 doses of azilsartan medoxomil, with valsartan 320 mg and olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan) 40 mg, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and clinic BP measurements. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in 24-hour mean systolic BP. Hierarchical analysis testing for superiority over placebo was followed by noninferiority analysis and then superiority testing of azilsartan medoxomil (80 mg and then 40 mg) versus the comparator ARBs. For 1291 randomized patients, mean age was 56 years, 54% were men, and baseline 24-hour mean systolic BP was 145 mm Hg. Azilsartan medoxomil at 80 mg had superior efficacy to both valsartan at 320 mg and olmesartan at 40 mg: placebo-adjusted 24-hour systolic BP was lowered (-14.3 mm Hg) more than 320 mg of valsartan (-10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and 40 mg of olmesartan (-11.7 mm Hg; P=0.009). Azilsartan medoxomil at 40 mg was noninferior to 40 mg of olmesartan (difference: -1.4 mm Hg [95% CI: -3.3 to 0.5]). For clinic systolic BP, both doses of azilsartan medoxomil were superior to the comparator ARBs. Safety and tolerability were similar among the placebo and 4 active treatments. These data demonstrate that azilsartan medoxomil at its maximal dose has superior efficacy to both olmesartan and valsartan at their maximal, approved doses without increasing adverse events. Azilsartan medoxomil could provide higher rates of hypertension control within the ARB class. (Hypertension. 2011;57:413-420.). Online Data Supplement
引用
收藏
页码:413 / U150
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on ambulatory blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients with overt diabetic nephropathy
    Shin-ichiro Masuda
    Kouichi Tamura
    Hiromichi Wakui
    Tomohiko Kanaoka
    Masato Ohsawa
    Akinobu Maeda
    Toru Dejima
    Mai Yanagi
    Koichi Azuma
    Satoshi Umemura
    Hypertension Research, 2009, 32 : 950 - 955
  • [32] Effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on ambulatory blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients with overt diabetic nephropathy
    Masuda, Shin-ichiro
    Tamura, Kouichi
    Wakui, Hiromichi
    Kanaoka, Tomohiko
    Ohsawa, Masato
    Maeda, Akinobu
    Dejima, Toru
    Yanagi, Mai
    Azuma, Koichi
    Umemura, Satoshi
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2009, 32 (11) : 950 - 955
  • [33] Efficacy/Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Losartan Potassium in Patients by Stage 1 or 2 Hypertension
    Flack, John M.
    Graff, Alan
    Li, Wei
    Chavanu, Kathleen J.
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2012, 124 (03) : 59 - 70
  • [34] New angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker olmesartan improves portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis
    Hidaka, Hisashi
    Kokubu, Shigehiro
    Nakazawa, Takahide
    Okuwaki, Yuusuke
    Ono, Kouji
    Watanabe, Masaaki
    Shibuya, Akitaka
    Saigenji, Katsunori
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2007, 37 (12) : 1011 - 1017
  • [35] Effects of valsartan on ambulatory pulse pressure in patients with grade 1-2 essential hypertension
    Hermida, RC
    Calvo, C
    Ayala, DE
    Covelo, M
    Rodriguez, M
    Mojon, A
    Fernandez, JR
    Lopez, JE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (05) : 62A - 62A
  • [36] Clinic and Home Blood Pressure Lowering Effect of an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, Fimasartan, in Postmenopausal Women with Hypertension
    Kim, Song-Yi
    Joo, Seung-Jae
    Shin, Mi-Seung
    Kim, Changsoo
    Cho, Eun Joo
    Sung, Ki-Chul
    Kang, Seok-Min
    Kim, Dong-Soo
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Hwang, Kyung-Kuk
    Park, Jeong Bae
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (22)
  • [37] Effects of high dose olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure control in patients with grade 2 and grade 3 hypertension
    L C Rump
    X Girerd
    L Sellin
    J Stegbauer
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2011, 25 : 565 - 574
  • [38] Effects of high dose olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure control in patients with grade 2 and grade 3 hypertension
    Rump, L. C.
    Girerd, X.
    Sellin, L.
    Stegbauer, J.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2011, 25 (09) : 565 - 574
  • [39] The Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared to Olmesartan on the Blood Pressure and Glucolipid Metabolism in DM Patients with Primary Hypertension
    Zhang, Shuang
    Yin, Zheng
    Li, Zhi-Fan
    Zhang, Wen-Jia
    Sui, Yong-Gang
    Xu, Yan-Lu
    Zhang, Hai-Tao
    Liu, Xiao-Ning
    Qiu, Hong
    Zhao, Jing-Lin
    Li, Jian-Jun
    Dou, Ke-Fei
    Qian, Jie
    Wu, Na-Qiong
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2024, 38 (06) : 1349 - 1358
  • [40] Antihypertensive Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil and Candesartan Cilexetil Assessed by 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Essential Hypertension
    Hans R. Brunner
    Klaus O. Stumpe
    Andrzej Januszewicz
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2003, 23 : 419 - 430