Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015

被引:11
|
作者
Kumar, Ashutosh [1 ]
Zhang, Kam Y. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] RIKEN, Struct Bioinformat Team, Ctr Life Sci Technol, 1-7-22 Suehiro, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2300045, Japan
关键词
Shape similarity; Pose prediction; Molecular docking; Virtual screening; D3R Grand Challenge 2015; DEPENDENT ROTAMER LIBRARY; CSAR BENCHMARK EXERCISE; CONFORMER GENERATION; MOLECULAR SHAPE; DATA SET; DOCKING; PROTEIN; INHIBITORS; IDENTIFICATION; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-016-9931-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Evaluation of ligand three-dimensional (3D) shape similarity is one of the commonly used approaches to identify ligands similar to one or more known active compounds from a library of small molecules. Apart from using ligand shape similarity as a virtual screening tool, its role in pose prediction and pose scoring has also been reported. We have recently developed a method that utilizes ligand 3D shape similarity with known crystallographic ligands to predict binding poses of query ligands. Here, we report the prospective evaluation of our pose prediction method through the participation in drug design data resource (D3R) Grand Challenge 2015. Our pose prediction method was used to predict binding poses of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) and mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase (MAP4K4) ligands and it was able to predict the pose within 2 root mean square deviation (RMSD) either as the top pose or among the best of five poses in a majority of cases. Specifically for HSP90 protein, a median RMSD of 0.73 and 0.68 was obtained for the top and the best of five predictions respectively. For MAP4K4 target, although the median RMSD for our top prediction was only 2.87 but the median RMSD of 1.67 for the best of five predictions was well within the limit for successful prediction. Furthermore, the performance of our pose prediction method for HSP90 and MAP4K4 ligands was always among the top five groups. Particularly, for MAP4K4 protein our pose prediction method was ranked number one both in terms of mean and median RMSD when the best of five predictions were considered. Overall, our D3R Grand Challenge 2015 results demonstrated that ligand 3D shape similarity with the crystal ligand is sufficient to predict binding poses of new ligands with acceptable accuracy.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:685 / 693
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DockBench as docking selector tool: the lesson learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2015
    Veronica Salmaso
    Mattia Sturlese
    Alberto Cuzzolin
    Stefano Moro
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30 : 773 - 789
  • [32] Affinity prediction using deep learning based on SMILES input for D3R grand challenge 4
    Lim, Sangrak
    Lee, Yong Oh
    Yoon, Juyong
    Kim, Young Jun
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2022, 36 (03) : 225 - 235
  • [33] Hybrid receptor structure/ligand-based docking and activity prediction in ICM: development and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Polo C.-H. Lam
    Ruben Abagyan
    Maxim Totrov
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 35 - 46
  • [34] Hybrid receptor structure/ligand-based docking and activity prediction in ICM: development and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Lam, Polo C. -H.
    Abagyan, Ruben
    Totrov, Maxim
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [35] DockBench as docking selector tool: the lesson learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2015
    Salmaso, Veronica
    Sturlese, Mattia
    Cuzzolin, Alberto
    Moro, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (09) : 773 - 789
  • [36] Monte Carlo on the manifold and MD refinement for binding pose prediction of protein-ligand complexes: 2017 D3R Grand Challenge
    Ignatov, Mikhail
    Liu, Cong
    Alekseenko, Andrey
    Sun, Zhuyezi
    Padhorny, Dzmitry
    Kotelnikov, Sergei
    Kazennov, Andrey
    Grebenkin, Ivan
    Kholodov, Yaroslav
    Kolosvari, Istvan
    Perez, Alberto
    Dill, Ken
    Kozakov, Dima
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [37] D3R Grand Challenge 3: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses and affinity rankings
    Gaieb, Zied
    Parks, Conor D.
    Chiu, Michael
    Yang, Huanwang
    Shao, Chenghua
    Walters, W. Patrick
    Lambert, Millard H.
    Nevins, Neysa
    Bembenek, Scott D.
    Ameriks, Michael K.
    Mirzadegan, Tara
    Burley, Stephen K.
    Amaro, Rommie E.
    Gilson, Michael K.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [38] MathDL: mathematical deep learning for D3R Grand Challenge 4
    Duc Duy Nguyen
    Gao, Kaifu
    Wang, Menglun
    Wei, Guo-Wei
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2020, 34 (02) : 131 - 147
  • [39] Coupling enhanced sampling of the apo-receptor with template-based ligand conformers selection: performance in pose prediction in the D3R Grand Challenge 4
    Basciu, Andrea
    Koukos, Panagiotis, I
    Malloci, Giuliano
    Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
    Vargiu, Attilio V.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2020, 34 (02) : 149 - 162
  • [40] Community participation in the D3R Continuous Evaluation of Ligand Pose Prediction (CELPP) competition
    Wagner, Jeffrey
    Liu, Shuai
    Gathiaka, Symon
    Malmstrom, Robert
    Gilson, Michael
    Amaro, Rommie
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253