Coupling enhanced sampling of the apo-receptor with template-based ligand conformers selection: performance in pose prediction in the D3R Grand Challenge 4

被引:6
|
作者
Basciu, Andrea [1 ]
Koukos, Panagiotis, I [2 ]
Malloci, Giuliano [1 ]
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. [2 ]
Vargiu, Attilio V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, Dipartimento Fis, SP 8 Km 0-700, I-09042 Monserrato, Italy
[2] Univ Utrecht, Fac Sci Chem, Bijvoet Ctr Biomol Res, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Molecular docking; Metadynamics; EDES; HADDOCK; AutoDock; BACE-1; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; BETA-SECRETASE; PROTEIN FLEXIBILITY; GENERATION; INHIBITORS; DOCKING; HADDOCK;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-019-00244-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We report the performance of our newly introduced Ensemble Docking with Enhanced sampling of pocket Shape (EDES) protocol coupled to a template-based algorithm to generate near-native ligand conformations in the 2019 iteration of the Grand Challenge (GC4) organized by the D3R consortium. Using either AutoDock4.2 or HADDOCK2.2 docking programs (each software in two variants of the protocol) our method generated native-like poses among the top 5 submitted for evaluation for most of the 20 targets with similar performances. The protein selected for GC4 was the human beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1), a transmembrane aspartic-acid protease. We identified at least one pose whose heavy-atoms RMSD was less than 2.5 angstrom from the native conformation for 16 (80%) and 17 (85%) of the 20 targets using AutoDock and HADDOCK, respectively. Dissecting the possible sources of errors revealed that: (i) our EDES protocol (with minor modifications) was able to sample sub-angstrom conformations for all 20 protein targets, reproducing the correct conformation of the binding site within similar to 1 angstrom RMSD; (ii) as already shown by some of us in GC3, even in the presence of near-native protein structures, a proper selection of ligand conformers is crucial for the success of ensemble-docking calculations. Importantly, our approach performed best among the protocols exploiting only structural information of the apo protein to generate conformations of the receptor for ensemble-docking calculations.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 162
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coupling enhanced sampling of the apo-receptor with template-based ligand conformers selection: performance in pose prediction in the D3R Grand Challenge 4
    Andrea Basciu
    Panagiotis I. Koukos
    Giuliano Malloci
    Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
    Attilio V. Vargiu
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2020, 34 : 149 - 162
  • [2] Sampling and refinement protocols for template-based macrocycle docking: 2018 D3R Grand Challenge 4
    Sergei Kotelnikov
    Andrey Alekseenko
    Cong Liu
    Mikhail Ignatov
    Dzmitry Padhorny
    Emiliano Brini
    Mark Lukin
    Evangelos Coutsias
    Ken A. Dill
    Dima Kozakov
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2020, 34 : 179 - 189
  • [3] Sampling and refinement protocols for template-based macrocycle docking: 2018 D3R Grand Challenge 4
    Kotelnikov, Sergei
    Alekseenko, Andrey
    Liu, Cong
    Ignatov, Mikhail
    Padhorny, Dzmitry
    Brini, Emiliano
    Lukin, Mark
    Coutsias, Evangelos
    Dill, Ken A.
    Kozakov, Dima
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2020, 34 (02) : 179 - 189
  • [4] Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Panagiotis I. Koukos
    Li C. Xue
    Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 83 - 91
  • [5] Protein-ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Koukos, Panagiotis I.
    Xue, Li C.
    Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [6] D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein–ligand pose and affinity predictions
    Symon Gathiaka
    Shuai Liu
    Michael Chiu
    Huanwang Yang
    Jeanne A. Stuckey
    You Na Kang
    Jim Delproposto
    Ginger Kubish
    James B. Dunbar
    Heather A. Carlson
    Stephen K. Burley
    W. Patrick Walters
    Rommie E. Amaro
    Victoria A. Feher
    Michael K. Gilson
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30 : 651 - 668
  • [7] Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016
    Fradera, Xavier
    Verras, Andreas
    Hu, Yuan
    Wang, Deping
    Wang, Hongwu
    Fells, James I.
    Armacost, Kira A.
    Crespo, Alejandro
    Sherborne, Brad
    Wang, Huijun
    Peng, Zhengwei
    Gao, Ying-Duo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (01) : 113 - 127
  • [8] Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Kumar, Ashutosh
    Zhang, Kam Y. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 47 - 59
  • [9] Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016
    Xavier Fradera
    Andreas Verras
    Yuan Hu
    Deping Wang
    Hongwu Wang
    James I. Fells
    Kira A. Armacost
    Alejandro Crespo
    Brad Sherborne
    Huijun Wang
    Zhengwei Peng
    Ying-Duo Gao
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 113 - 127
  • [10] Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015
    Kumar, Ashutosh
    Zhang, Kam Y. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (09) : 685 - 693