Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015

被引:11
|
作者
Kumar, Ashutosh [1 ]
Zhang, Kam Y. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] RIKEN, Struct Bioinformat Team, Ctr Life Sci Technol, 1-7-22 Suehiro, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2300045, Japan
关键词
Shape similarity; Pose prediction; Molecular docking; Virtual screening; D3R Grand Challenge 2015; DEPENDENT ROTAMER LIBRARY; CSAR BENCHMARK EXERCISE; CONFORMER GENERATION; MOLECULAR SHAPE; DATA SET; DOCKING; PROTEIN; INHIBITORS; IDENTIFICATION; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-016-9931-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Evaluation of ligand three-dimensional (3D) shape similarity is one of the commonly used approaches to identify ligands similar to one or more known active compounds from a library of small molecules. Apart from using ligand shape similarity as a virtual screening tool, its role in pose prediction and pose scoring has also been reported. We have recently developed a method that utilizes ligand 3D shape similarity with known crystallographic ligands to predict binding poses of query ligands. Here, we report the prospective evaluation of our pose prediction method through the participation in drug design data resource (D3R) Grand Challenge 2015. Our pose prediction method was used to predict binding poses of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) and mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase (MAP4K4) ligands and it was able to predict the pose within 2 root mean square deviation (RMSD) either as the top pose or among the best of five poses in a majority of cases. Specifically for HSP90 protein, a median RMSD of 0.73 and 0.68 was obtained for the top and the best of five predictions respectively. For MAP4K4 target, although the median RMSD for our top prediction was only 2.87 but the median RMSD of 1.67 for the best of five predictions was well within the limit for successful prediction. Furthermore, the performance of our pose prediction method for HSP90 and MAP4K4 ligands was always among the top five groups. Particularly, for MAP4K4 protein our pose prediction method was ranked number one both in terms of mean and median RMSD when the best of five predictions were considered. Overall, our D3R Grand Challenge 2015 results demonstrated that ligand 3D shape similarity with the crystal ligand is sufficient to predict binding poses of new ligands with acceptable accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 693
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015
    Ashutosh Kumar
    Kam Y. J. Zhang
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30 : 685 - 693
  • [2] Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Kumar, Ashutosh
    Zhang, Kam Y. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 47 - 59
  • [3] Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Ashutosh Kumar
    Kam Y. J. Zhang
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 47 - 59
  • [4] D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein–ligand pose and affinity predictions
    Symon Gathiaka
    Shuai Liu
    Michael Chiu
    Huanwang Yang
    Jeanne A. Stuckey
    You Na Kang
    Jim Delproposto
    Ginger Kubish
    James B. Dunbar
    Heather A. Carlson
    Stephen K. Burley
    W. Patrick Walters
    Rommie E. Amaro
    Victoria A. Feher
    Michael K. Gilson
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30 : 651 - 668
  • [5] Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015
    Slynko, Inna
    Da Silva, Franck
    Bret, Guillaume
    Rognan, Didier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (09) : 669 - 683
  • [6] Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015
    Inna Slynko
    Franck Da Silva
    Guillaume Bret
    Didier Rognan
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30 : 669 - 683
  • [7] D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions
    Gathiaka, Symon
    Liu, Shuai
    Chiu, Michael
    Yang, Huanwang
    Stuckey, Jeanne A.
    Kang, You Na
    Delproposto, Jim
    Kubish, Ginger
    Dunbar, James B., Jr.
    Carlson, Heather A.
    Burley, Stephen K.
    Walters, W. Patrick
    Amaro, Rommie E.
    Feher, Victoria A.
    Gilson, Michael K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (09) : 651 - 668
  • [8] Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016
    Fradera, Xavier
    Verras, Andreas
    Hu, Yuan
    Wang, Deping
    Wang, Hongwu
    Fells, James I.
    Armacost, Kira A.
    Crespo, Alejandro
    Sherborne, Brad
    Wang, Huijun
    Peng, Zhengwei
    Gao, Ying-Duo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (01) : 113 - 127
  • [9] Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016
    Xavier Fradera
    Andreas Verras
    Yuan Hu
    Deping Wang
    Hongwu Wang
    James I. Fells
    Kira A. Armacost
    Alejandro Crespo
    Brad Sherborne
    Huijun Wang
    Zhengwei Peng
    Ying-Duo Gao
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 113 - 127
  • [10] CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D3R Grand Challenge 2
    Ding, Xinqiang
    Hayes, Ryan L.
    Vilseck, Jonah Z.
    Charles, Murchtricia K.
    Brooks, Charles L., III
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (01) : 89 - 102