Epidemiology of uterine rupture among pregnant women in China and development of a risk prediction model: analysis of data from a multicentre, cross-sectional study

被引:7
|
作者
Zhan, Wenqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Jing [3 ,4 ]
Hua, Xiaolin [5 ]
Ye, Jiangfeng [6 ]
Chen, Qian [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [7 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth,Minist E, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Int Peace Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Key Lab Embryo Original Dis, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, Sch Med, Dept Obstet, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Hainan Women & Childrens Med Ctr, Haikou, Hainan, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
public health; epidemiology; maternal medicine; VAGINAL BIRTH; CESAREAN DELIVERY; LABOR; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054540
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe the epidemiology of uterine rupture in China from 2015 to 2016 and to build a prediction model for uterine rupture in women with a scarred uterus. Setting A multicentre cross-sectional survey conducted in 96 hospitals across China in 2015-2016. Participants Our survey initially included 77 789 birth records from hospitals with 1000 or more deliveries per year. We excluded 2567 births less than 24 gestational weeks or unknown and 1042 births with unknown status of uterine rupture, leaving 74 180 births for the final analysis. Primary and secondary outcome measures Complete and incomplete uterine rupture and the risk factors, and a prediction model for uterine rupture in women with scarred uterus (assigned each birth a weight based on the sampling frame). Results The weighted incidence of uterine rupture was 0.18% (95% CI 0.05% to 0.23%) in our study population during 2015 and 2016. The weighted incidence of uterine rupture in women with scarred and intact uterus was 0.79% (95% CI 0.63% to 0.91%) and 0.05% (95% CI 0.02% to 0.13%), respectively. Younger or older maternal age, prepregnancy diabetes, overweight or obesity, complications during pregnancy (hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and gestational diabetes), low education, repeat caesarean section (>= 2), multiple abortions (>= 2), assisted reproductive technology, placenta previa, induce labour, fetal malpresentation, multiple pregnancy, anaemia, high parity and antepartum stillbirth were associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture. The prediction model including eight variables (OR >1.5) yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.812 (95% CI 0.793 to 0.836) in predicting uterine rupture in women with scarred uterus with sensitivity and specificity of 77.2% and 69.8%, respectively. Conclusions The incidence of uterine rupture was 0.18% in this population in 2015-2016. The predictive model based on eight easily available variables had a moderate predictive value in predicting uterine rupture in women with scarred uterus. Strategies based on predictions may be considered to further reduce the burden of uterine rupture in China.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Weight-related risk perception among healthy and overweight pregnant women: a cross-sectional study
    de Jersey, S. J.
    Callaway, L. K.
    Daniels, L. A.
    Nicholson, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 35 (09) : 683 - 688
  • [32] Heterogeneity of symptoms and functions among women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer in China: A multicentre, cross-sectional study
    Cai, Tingting
    Zhou, Tingting
    Yuan, Changrong
    Yu, Chunfang
    Ni, Feixia
    Sheng, Zhiren
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [33] Preferences for Mental Health Screening Among Pregnant Women A Cross-Sectional Study
    Kingston, Dawn E.
    Biringer, Anne
    McDonald, Sheila W.
    Heaman, Maureen I.
    Lasiuk, Gerri C.
    Hegadoren, Kathy M.
    McDonald, Sarah D.
    van Zanten, Sander Veldhuyzen
    Sword, Wendy
    Kingston, Joshua J.
    Jarema, Karly M.
    Vermeyden, Lydia
    Austin, Marie-Paule
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (04) : E35 - E43
  • [34] Health literacy responsiveness: a cross-sectional study among pregnant women in Denmark
    Brorsen, Eva
    Rasmussen, Trine D.
    Ekstrom, Claus T.
    Osborne, Richard H.
    Villadsen, Sarah F.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 50 (04) : 507 - 515
  • [35] Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study
    Jacktan Josephat Ruhighira
    Fredirick L. Mashili
    Alexander Mtemi Tungu
    Simon Mamuya
    BMC Women's Health, 22
  • [36] Predictors of Anaemia Prevalence Among Ghanaian Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Akowuah, Jones Asafo
    Owusu-Addo, Ebenezer
    Opuni, Ama Antwiwaa
    INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2022, 59
  • [37] Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study
    Ruhighira, Jacktan Josephat
    Mashili, Fredirick L. L.
    Tungu, Alexander Mtemi
    Mamuya, Simon
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [38] Sleep disturbances among pregnant women with history of migraines: A cross-sectional study
    Qiu, Chunfang
    Frederick, Ihunnaya O.
    Sorensen, Tanya
    Aurora, Sheena K.
    Gelaye, Bizu
    Enquobahrie, Daniel A.
    Williams, Michelle A.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2015, 35 (12) : 1092 - 1102
  • [39] Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study
    Offeddu, Vittoria
    Tam, Clarence C.
    Yong, Tze Tein
    Tan, Lay Kok
    Thoon, Koh Cheng
    Lee, Nicole
    Tan, Thiam Chye
    Yeo, George S. H.
    Yung, Chee Fu
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [40] Awareness among Pregnant Women about Epidural Analgesia: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Almuntashiri, Waad M.
    Mutawakkil, Aseel S.
    Alghamdi, Amjad S.
    Alqarni, Razan D.
    Althubaiti, Alaa M.
    Kayal, Haifaa S.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 2022