Epidemiology of uterine rupture among pregnant women in China and development of a risk prediction model: analysis of data from a multicentre, cross-sectional study

被引:7
|
作者
Zhan, Wenqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Jing [3 ,4 ]
Hua, Xiaolin [5 ]
Ye, Jiangfeng [6 ]
Chen, Qian [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [7 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth,Minist E, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Int Peace Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Key Lab Embryo Original Dis, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, Sch Med, Dept Obstet, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Hainan Women & Childrens Med Ctr, Haikou, Hainan, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
public health; epidemiology; maternal medicine; VAGINAL BIRTH; CESAREAN DELIVERY; LABOR; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054540
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe the epidemiology of uterine rupture in China from 2015 to 2016 and to build a prediction model for uterine rupture in women with a scarred uterus. Setting A multicentre cross-sectional survey conducted in 96 hospitals across China in 2015-2016. Participants Our survey initially included 77 789 birth records from hospitals with 1000 or more deliveries per year. We excluded 2567 births less than 24 gestational weeks or unknown and 1042 births with unknown status of uterine rupture, leaving 74 180 births for the final analysis. Primary and secondary outcome measures Complete and incomplete uterine rupture and the risk factors, and a prediction model for uterine rupture in women with scarred uterus (assigned each birth a weight based on the sampling frame). Results The weighted incidence of uterine rupture was 0.18% (95% CI 0.05% to 0.23%) in our study population during 2015 and 2016. The weighted incidence of uterine rupture in women with scarred and intact uterus was 0.79% (95% CI 0.63% to 0.91%) and 0.05% (95% CI 0.02% to 0.13%), respectively. Younger or older maternal age, prepregnancy diabetes, overweight or obesity, complications during pregnancy (hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and gestational diabetes), low education, repeat caesarean section (>= 2), multiple abortions (>= 2), assisted reproductive technology, placenta previa, induce labour, fetal malpresentation, multiple pregnancy, anaemia, high parity and antepartum stillbirth were associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture. The prediction model including eight variables (OR >1.5) yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.812 (95% CI 0.793 to 0.836) in predicting uterine rupture in women with scarred uterus with sensitivity and specificity of 77.2% and 69.8%, respectively. Conclusions The incidence of uterine rupture was 0.18% in this population in 2015-2016. The predictive model based on eight easily available variables had a moderate predictive value in predicting uterine rupture in women with scarred uterus. Strategies based on predictions may be considered to further reduce the burden of uterine rupture in China.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Physical activity in low risk pregnant women: a cross-sectional study
    Menichini, D.
    Fanetti, O.
    Molinazzi, M. T.
    Facchinetti, F.
    Ricchi, A.
    Neri, I
    CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2020, 171 (04): : E328 - E334
  • [22] Antibiotic Prescriptions among China Ambulatory Care Visits of Pregnant Women: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
    Zhao, Houyu
    Zhang, Mei
    Bian, Jiaming
    Zhan, Siyan
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (05):
  • [23] Gestational Diabetes and Analysis of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes Among Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Biju, Praisy B.
    Chaudhary, Raushan Kumar
    Radhakrishnan, Krishnapriya
    Shetty, Shraddha
    Mateti, Uday Venkat
    Raju, Barma Naga
    Sonkusare, Shipra
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2024, 74 (05): : 447 - 453
  • [24] Fear of Childbirth and Associated Risk Factors in Healthy Pregnant Women in Northwest of China: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Zhou, Xiaolan
    Liu, Hua
    Li, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Shaoru
    PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 : 731 - 741
  • [25] Prevalence and risk factors of hypocalcemia among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Maiduguri, Nigeria: A cross-sectional study
    Bako, B.
    El-Nafaty, A. U.
    Mshelia, D. S.
    Gali, R. M.
    Isa, B.
    Dungus, M. M.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 24 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [26] Risk factors for anaemia among pregnant women: A cross-sectional study in Upper East Region, Ghana
    Asobuno, Clotilda
    Adjei-Gyamfi, Silas
    Aabebe, Felix Gumaayiri
    Hammond, John
    Taikeophithoun, Chansathit
    Amuna, Norbert Ndaah
    Aoki, Tsunenori
    Aiga, Hirotsugu
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (11):
  • [27] Registered Clinical Trials Comprising Pregnant Women in China: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Zhao, Yi
    Du, Guiping
    Luan, Xiaofei
    Yang, Hui
    Zhang, Qiongguang
    Zhang, Zhengfu
    Wang, Subiao
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [28] Weight-related risk perception among healthy and overweight pregnant women: a cross-sectional study
    S J de Jersey
    L K Callaway
    L A Daniels
    J M Nicholson
    Journal of Perinatology, 2015, 35 : 683 - 688
  • [29] Iron status and risk factors of iron deficiency among pregnant women in Singapore: a cross-sectional study
    See Ling Loy
    Li Min Lim
    Shiao-Yng Chan
    Pei Ting Tan
    Yen Lin Chee
    Phaik Ling Quah
    Jerry Kok Yen Chan
    Kok Hian Tan
    Fabian Yap
    Keith M. Godfrey
    Lynette Pei-Chi Shek
    Mary Foong-Fong Chong
    Michael S. Kramer
    Yap-Seng Chong
    Claudia Chi
    BMC Public Health, 19
  • [30] Iron status and risk factors of iron deficiency among pregnant women in Singapore: a cross-sectional study
    Loy, See Ling
    Lim, Li Min
    Chan, Shiao-Yng
    Pei Ting Tan
    Chee, Yen Lin
    Quah, Phaik Ling
    Chan, Jerry Kok Yen
    Tan, Kok Hian
    Yap, Fabian
    Godfrey, Keith M.
    Shek, Lynette Pei-Chi
    Chong, Mary Foong-Fong
    Kramer, Michael S.
    Chong, Yap-Seng
    Chi, Claudia
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)