Epidemiology of uterine rupture among pregnant women in China and development of a risk prediction model: analysis of data from a multicentre, cross-sectional study

被引:7
|
作者
Zhan, Wenqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Jing [3 ,4 ]
Hua, Xiaolin [5 ]
Ye, Jiangfeng [6 ]
Chen, Qian [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [7 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth,Minist E, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Int Peace Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Key Lab Embryo Original Dis, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, Sch Med, Dept Obstet, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Hainan Women & Childrens Med Ctr, Haikou, Hainan, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
public health; epidemiology; maternal medicine; VAGINAL BIRTH; CESAREAN DELIVERY; LABOR; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054540
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe the epidemiology of uterine rupture in China from 2015 to 2016 and to build a prediction model for uterine rupture in women with a scarred uterus. Setting A multicentre cross-sectional survey conducted in 96 hospitals across China in 2015-2016. Participants Our survey initially included 77 789 birth records from hospitals with 1000 or more deliveries per year. We excluded 2567 births less than 24 gestational weeks or unknown and 1042 births with unknown status of uterine rupture, leaving 74 180 births for the final analysis. Primary and secondary outcome measures Complete and incomplete uterine rupture and the risk factors, and a prediction model for uterine rupture in women with scarred uterus (assigned each birth a weight based on the sampling frame). Results The weighted incidence of uterine rupture was 0.18% (95% CI 0.05% to 0.23%) in our study population during 2015 and 2016. The weighted incidence of uterine rupture in women with scarred and intact uterus was 0.79% (95% CI 0.63% to 0.91%) and 0.05% (95% CI 0.02% to 0.13%), respectively. Younger or older maternal age, prepregnancy diabetes, overweight or obesity, complications during pregnancy (hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and gestational diabetes), low education, repeat caesarean section (>= 2), multiple abortions (>= 2), assisted reproductive technology, placenta previa, induce labour, fetal malpresentation, multiple pregnancy, anaemia, high parity and antepartum stillbirth were associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture. The prediction model including eight variables (OR >1.5) yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.812 (95% CI 0.793 to 0.836) in predicting uterine rupture in women with scarred uterus with sensitivity and specificity of 77.2% and 69.8%, respectively. Conclusions The incidence of uterine rupture was 0.18% in this population in 2015-2016. The predictive model based on eight easily available variables had a moderate predictive value in predicting uterine rupture in women with scarred uterus. Strategies based on predictions may be considered to further reduce the burden of uterine rupture in China.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Domestic violence: A cross-sectional study among pregnant and postpartum women
    Sanchez, Odette del Risco
    Tanaka Zambrano, Erika
    Dantas-Silva, Amanda
    Bonas, Mariana Kerche
    Grieger, Isabella
    Machado, Helymar Costa
    Surita, Fernanda Garanhani
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2023, 79 (04) : 1525 - 1539
  • [12] Information Resources Among Flemish Pregnant Women: Cross-sectional Study
    Lanssens, Dorien
    Thijs, Inge M.
    Dreesen, Pauline
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Coorevits, Pascal
    Gaethofs, Gitte
    Derycke, Joyce
    Tency, Inge
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (10)
  • [13] Attitude for vaccination prophylaxis among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study
    Bianchi, Francesco Paolo
    Stefanizzi, Pasquale
    Lattanzio, Sabrina
    Diella, Giusy
    Germinario, Cinzia Annatea
    Tafuri, Silvio
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2022,
  • [14] MATERNAL INTENTION TO BREASTFEED AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    Goes, Fernanda Garcia Bezerra
    Vianna, Laiz Trocado Sobral de Souza
    Correa, Bianca da Silva Ornellas
    Pereira-Avila, Fernanda Maria Vieira
    Santos, Leticia de Assis
    Goulart, Maithe de Carvalho e Lemos
    REVISTA DE PESQUISA-CUIDADO E FUNDAMENTAL ONLINE, 2023, 15
  • [15] Nutrition knowledge among pregnant women in Lebanon: A cross-sectional study
    Rizk, Jessy
    Andreou, Eleni
    Hileti, Dona
    Ghaddar, Ali
    Zampelas, Antonis
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 20
  • [16] Toxoplasma prevalence among pregnant women in Norway: a cross-sectional study
    Findal, Gry
    Barlinn, Regine
    Sandven, Irene
    Stray-Pedersen, Babill
    Nordbo, Svein A.
    Samdal, Helvi H.
    Vainio, Kirsti
    Dudman, Susanne G.
    Jenum, Pal A.
    APMIS, 2015, 123 (04) : 321 - 325
  • [17] Prelabour Rupture of Membranes among Pregnant Women Visiting a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
    Dwa, Yam Prasad
    Bhandari, Sunita
    Bajracharya, Manisha
    JOURNAL OF NEPAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 61 (262) : 506 - 509
  • [18] Predictors of uterine rupture in a large sample of women in Senegal and Mali: cross-sectional analysis of QUARITE trial data
    Rebecca Delafield
    Catherine M. Pirkle
    Alexandre Dumont
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18
  • [19] Predictors of uterine rupture in a large sample of women in Senegal and Mali: cross-sectional analysis of QUARITE trial data
    Delafield, Rebecca
    Pirkle, Catherine M.
    Dumont, Alexandre
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
  • [20] Risk factors for hypertension in pregnant women in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study
    Oktarina, Oktarina
    Nantabah, Zainul Khaqiqi
    Nyoman, Juliasih
    Ristrini, Ristrini
    Hakim, Lukman
    Ridwan, Wawan
    Rachmat, Basuki
    Wardhani, Yurika Fauzia
    Rukmini, Rukmini
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 17 (09) : 408 - 417