Outcome of Stable Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Within 48 Hours: A Single-Center, Retrospective Experience

被引:26
|
作者
Grothusen, Christina [1 ]
Friedrich, Christine [1 ]
Loehr, Johannes [1 ]
Meinert, Jette [1 ]
Ohnewald, Eva [1 ]
Ulbricht, Ulysses [1 ]
Attmann, Tim [1 ]
Haneya, Assad [1 ]
Huenges, Katharina [1 ]
Freitag-Wolf, Sandra [2 ]
Schoettler, Jan [1 ]
Cremer, Jochen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Campus Kiel Arnold Heller Str 3,Haus 18, Kiel, Germany
[2] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Med Informat & Stat, Kiel, Germany
来源
关键词
coronary artery bypass; myocardial infarction; AORTIC-VALVE IMPLANTATION; REVASCULARIZATION; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT; LACTATE; TRENDS; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.117.005498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-The optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in clinically stable patients with acute myocardial infarction who are unsuitable for percutaneous coronary intervention is unclear. We report our experience with early CABG in these patients. Methods and Results-Between January 2001 and May 2015, 766 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, n= 305) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI, n= 461) not including cardiogenic shock underwent CABG within 48 hours at our department. STEMI patients were younger than non-STEMI patients (age 65 years [range: 58-72] versus 70 years [range: 62-75], P< 0.001) with a lower EuroSCORE II (4.12 [range: 2.75-5.81] versus 4.58 [range: 2.80-7.74], P= 0.009). STEMI patients had undergone preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention more often (20.3% versus 7.8%, P< 0.001). Time to surgery was shorter in STEMI compared with non-STEMI patients (5.0 hours [range: 3.2-8.8] versus 11.7 hours [range: 6.4-22.0], P< 0.001). No significant differences concerning arterial graft use (93.8% versus 94.8%, P= 0.540) or complete revascularization (87.5% versus 83.4%, P= 0.121) were observed. The rate of strokes did not differ between the groups (2.0% versus 3.9%, P= 0.134). Thirty-day mortality was lower in STEMI patients (2.7% versus 6.6% P= 0.018), especially when CABG was performed within 6 hours (1.8% versus 7.1%, P= 0.041). Survival of STEMI and nonSTEMI patients was 94% versus 88% after 1 year (P< 0.001), 87% versus 73% after 5 years (P< 0.001), and 74% versus 57% after 10 years (P< 0.001). Independent predictors of 30-day and long-term mortality included preoperatively increased lactate values, age, atrial fibrillation, and reduced left ventricular function. Conclusions-Stable STEMI patients showed a lower rate of perioperative complications and better survival compared with nonSTEMI patients when CABG was performed within 48 hours.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction after previous coronary artery bypass surgery: 26-year experience of the POP study
    Mitrovic, P.
    Stefanovic, B.
    Radovanovic, M.
    Radovanovic, N.
    Matic, G.
    Rajic, D.
    Lasica, R.
    Novakovic, A.
    Mijic, N.
    Vasiljevic, Z.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 751 - 751
  • [42] The clinical evaluation of PDCA management model for acute myocardial infarction with percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience
    Fan, Yanqiu
    Zhou, Xiaoyan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (12) : 3034 - 3035
  • [43] Experience of the management of coronary artery bypass graft only on moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation A single-center retrospective study
    Wang, Weitie
    Li, Bo
    Wang, Yong
    Piao, Hulin
    Zhu, Zhicheng
    Xu, Rihao
    Li, Dan
    Liu, Kexiang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (17)
  • [44] Distal protection in native coronary arteries during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction:: Single-center experience
    Orrego, PS
    Delgado, A
    Piccalò, G
    Salvadè, P
    Bonacina, E
    Klugmann, S
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2003, 60 (02) : 152 - 158
  • [45] Evaluation of post-operative development of mediastinitis in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A single-center experience
    Akyildiz, Ozay
    Ulular, Omer
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2022, 28 (02): : 180 - 186
  • [46] In-hospital outcome of primary PCI for patients with acute myocardial infarction and prior coronary artery bypass grafting
    Liu, Yu
    Wang, Le-Feng
    Yang, Xin-Chun
    Su, Pi-Xiong
    Li, Kui-Bao
    Wang, Hong-Shi
    Chen, Mu-Lei
    Xu, Li
    Zhong, Jiu-Chang
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (03) : 1737 - 1745
  • [47] Characteristics, management, and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with bypass surgery
    Every, NR
    Maynard, C
    Cochran, RP
    Martin, J
    Weaver, WD
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (09) : 81 - 86
  • [48] Poor outcome after myocardial infarction of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of the VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion trial (VALIANT)
    Berry, C.
    Pieper, K. S.
    White, H. D.
    Solomon, S. D.
    Van de Werf, F.
    Velazquez, E. J.
    Maggioni, A. P.
    Califf, R. M.
    Pfeffer, M. A.
    Mcmurray, J. J. V.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 350 - 350
  • [49] Sex differences following percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for acute myocardial infarction
    Donna Shu-Han Lin
    Yu-Sheng Lin
    Jen-Kuang Lee
    Hsien-Li Kao
    Biology of Sex Differences, 13
  • [50] Coronary artery bypass graft surgery after acute myocardial infarction caused by thrombosis of coronary aneurysm
    Ribeiro Ferreira, Victor Rodrigues
    Braile Sternieri, Valeria B.
    Ferreira Leal, Joao Carlos
    Avanci, Luis Ernesto
    Abelaira Filho, Achilles
    Spotti, Mariane
    Souza Junior, Arthur Soares
    Braile, Domingo Marcolino
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIRURGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2011, 26 (04): : 667 - 669