Outcome of Stable Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Within 48 Hours: A Single-Center, Retrospective Experience

被引:26
|
作者
Grothusen, Christina [1 ]
Friedrich, Christine [1 ]
Loehr, Johannes [1 ]
Meinert, Jette [1 ]
Ohnewald, Eva [1 ]
Ulbricht, Ulysses [1 ]
Attmann, Tim [1 ]
Haneya, Assad [1 ]
Huenges, Katharina [1 ]
Freitag-Wolf, Sandra [2 ]
Schoettler, Jan [1 ]
Cremer, Jochen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Campus Kiel Arnold Heller Str 3,Haus 18, Kiel, Germany
[2] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Med Informat & Stat, Kiel, Germany
来源
关键词
coronary artery bypass; myocardial infarction; AORTIC-VALVE IMPLANTATION; REVASCULARIZATION; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT; LACTATE; TRENDS; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.117.005498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-The optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in clinically stable patients with acute myocardial infarction who are unsuitable for percutaneous coronary intervention is unclear. We report our experience with early CABG in these patients. Methods and Results-Between January 2001 and May 2015, 766 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, n= 305) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI, n= 461) not including cardiogenic shock underwent CABG within 48 hours at our department. STEMI patients were younger than non-STEMI patients (age 65 years [range: 58-72] versus 70 years [range: 62-75], P< 0.001) with a lower EuroSCORE II (4.12 [range: 2.75-5.81] versus 4.58 [range: 2.80-7.74], P= 0.009). STEMI patients had undergone preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention more often (20.3% versus 7.8%, P< 0.001). Time to surgery was shorter in STEMI compared with non-STEMI patients (5.0 hours [range: 3.2-8.8] versus 11.7 hours [range: 6.4-22.0], P< 0.001). No significant differences concerning arterial graft use (93.8% versus 94.8%, P= 0.540) or complete revascularization (87.5% versus 83.4%, P= 0.121) were observed. The rate of strokes did not differ between the groups (2.0% versus 3.9%, P= 0.134). Thirty-day mortality was lower in STEMI patients (2.7% versus 6.6% P= 0.018), especially when CABG was performed within 6 hours (1.8% versus 7.1%, P= 0.041). Survival of STEMI and nonSTEMI patients was 94% versus 88% after 1 year (P< 0.001), 87% versus 73% after 5 years (P< 0.001), and 74% versus 57% after 10 years (P< 0.001). Independent predictors of 30-day and long-term mortality included preoperatively increased lactate values, age, atrial fibrillation, and reduced left ventricular function. Conclusions-Stable STEMI patients showed a lower rate of perioperative complications and better survival compared with nonSTEMI patients when CABG was performed within 48 hours.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trends and Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Megaly, Michael
    Sedhom, Ramy
    Elbadawi, Ayman
    Buda, Kevin
    Basir, Mir B.
    Garcia, Santiago
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Rinfret, Stephane
    Alaswad, Khaldoon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 179 : 11 - 17
  • [32] Outcome of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery receiving thrombolytic therapy
    Labinaz, M
    Sketch, MH
    Ellis, SG
    Abramowitz, BM
    Stebbins, AL
    Pieper, KS
    Holmes, DR
    Califf, RM
    Topol, EJ
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 141 (03) : 469 - 477
  • [33] Primary percutaneous interventions for acute myocardial infarction in octogenarians: A single-center experience
    Skelding, KA
    Mehta, LS
    Pica, MC
    Finta, B
    Shoukfeh, M
    Grines, CL
    O'Neill, WW
    Kahn, JK
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 25 (08) : 363 - 366
  • [34] Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection as a Cause of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Young Female Population: A Single-center Study
    Meng, Pei-Na
    Xu, Chen
    You, Wei
    Wu, Zhi-Ming
    Xie, Du-Jiang
    Zhang, Hang
    Pan, Chang
    Ye, Fei
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 130 (13) : 1534 - 1539
  • [35] Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection as a Cause of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Young Female Population: A Single-center Study
    Meng Pei-Na
    Xu Chen
    You Wei
    Wu Zhi-Ming
    Xie Du-Jiang
    Zhang Hang
    Pan Chang
    Ye Fei
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2017, 130 (13) : 1534 - 1539
  • [36] Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: a single-center retrospective study by sex and race
    Hsueh, Christine
    Esin, Ghenekaro
    Breen, Thomas
    Gitto, Mauro
    Katz, Miriam
    Gulati, Martha
    Capers, Quinn
    Reynolds, Harmony R.
    Volgman, Annabelle S.
    Wenger, Nanette
    Altin, S. Elissa
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2024, 35 (08) : 684 - 691
  • [37] Early and late outcome after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with coronary endarterectomy: A single-center 10-year experience
    Vohra, HA
    Kanwar, R
    Khan, T
    Dimitri, WR
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 81 (05): : 1691 - 1696
  • [38] EMERGENCY CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    PIRWITZ, MJ
    HILLIS, LD
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 1994, 5 (05) : 385 - 391
  • [39] Optimal timing for coronary artery bypass graft surgery after acute myocardial infarction
    Iakobishvili, Z.
    Kogan, A.
    Sandach, A.
    Porter, A.
    Drust, V.
    Stamler, A.
    Snir, E.
    Vidne, B.
    Porat, E.
    Hasdai, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 358 - 358
  • [40] Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
    Grothusen, Christina
    Friedrich, Christine
    Ulbricht, Ulysses
    Meinert, Jette
    Attmann, Tim
    Huenges, Katharina
    Borzikowsky, Christoph
    Haneya, Assad
    Schoettler, Jan
    Cremer, Jochen
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (07)