Outcome of Stable Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Within 48 Hours: A Single-Center, Retrospective Experience

被引:26
|
作者
Grothusen, Christina [1 ]
Friedrich, Christine [1 ]
Loehr, Johannes [1 ]
Meinert, Jette [1 ]
Ohnewald, Eva [1 ]
Ulbricht, Ulysses [1 ]
Attmann, Tim [1 ]
Haneya, Assad [1 ]
Huenges, Katharina [1 ]
Freitag-Wolf, Sandra [2 ]
Schoettler, Jan [1 ]
Cremer, Jochen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Campus Kiel Arnold Heller Str 3,Haus 18, Kiel, Germany
[2] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Med Informat & Stat, Kiel, Germany
来源
关键词
coronary artery bypass; myocardial infarction; AORTIC-VALVE IMPLANTATION; REVASCULARIZATION; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT; LACTATE; TRENDS; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.117.005498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-The optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in clinically stable patients with acute myocardial infarction who are unsuitable for percutaneous coronary intervention is unclear. We report our experience with early CABG in these patients. Methods and Results-Between January 2001 and May 2015, 766 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, n= 305) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI, n= 461) not including cardiogenic shock underwent CABG within 48 hours at our department. STEMI patients were younger than non-STEMI patients (age 65 years [range: 58-72] versus 70 years [range: 62-75], P< 0.001) with a lower EuroSCORE II (4.12 [range: 2.75-5.81] versus 4.58 [range: 2.80-7.74], P= 0.009). STEMI patients had undergone preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention more often (20.3% versus 7.8%, P< 0.001). Time to surgery was shorter in STEMI compared with non-STEMI patients (5.0 hours [range: 3.2-8.8] versus 11.7 hours [range: 6.4-22.0], P< 0.001). No significant differences concerning arterial graft use (93.8% versus 94.8%, P= 0.540) or complete revascularization (87.5% versus 83.4%, P= 0.121) were observed. The rate of strokes did not differ between the groups (2.0% versus 3.9%, P= 0.134). Thirty-day mortality was lower in STEMI patients (2.7% versus 6.6% P= 0.018), especially when CABG was performed within 6 hours (1.8% versus 7.1%, P= 0.041). Survival of STEMI and nonSTEMI patients was 94% versus 88% after 1 year (P< 0.001), 87% versus 73% after 5 years (P< 0.001), and 74% versus 57% after 10 years (P< 0.001). Independent predictors of 30-day and long-term mortality included preoperatively increased lactate values, age, atrial fibrillation, and reduced left ventricular function. Conclusions-Stable STEMI patients showed a lower rate of perioperative complications and better survival compared with nonSTEMI patients when CABG was performed within 48 hours.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] OUTCOME AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION IN PATIENTS WITH PRIOR CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY
    DITTRICH, HC
    GILPIN, E
    NICOD, P
    HENNING, H
    CALI, G
    RICOU, F
    ROSS, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 72 (07): : 507 - 513
  • [12] Acute myocardial infarction in patients who have had coronary artery bypass surgery
    Shapira, I
    Fisman, EZ
    Drory, Y
    Pines, A
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 90 (11) : 1129 - 1132
  • [13] Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: a single-center retrospective study
    Sa, Fernando Montenegro
    Ruivo, Catarina
    Santos, Luis G.
    Antunes, Alexandre
    Saraiva, Fatima
    Soares, Francisco
    Morais, Joao
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2018, 29 (06) : 511 - 515
  • [14] EVALUATION OF CORONARY ANATOMY OF PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY SUFFERING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Gencaslan, M.
    Duyuler, S.
    Turker, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 163 : S173 - S173
  • [15] Prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery; 19-year experience
    Mitrovic, P. M.
    Stefanovic, B.
    Vukcevic, V.
    Radovanovic, N.
    Radovanovic, M.
    Rajic, D.
    Matic, G.
    Vasiljevic, Z.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 69 - 69
  • [16] Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with acute myocardial infarction
    Mohr, R
    Moshkovitch, Y
    Shapira, I
    Amir, G
    Hod, H
    Gurevitch, J
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 118 (01): : 50 - 56
  • [17] Investigating outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery: a single-center retrospective study in Jordan
    Hijazi, Emad
    FUTURE SCIENCE OA, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [18] Characteristics, management and outcome of patients with prior coronary bypass surgery presenting with acute myocardial infarction
    Zahger, D
    Behar, S
    Harpaz, D
    Leor, J
    Weiss, AT
    Gottlieb, S
    CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [19] Comparison of multivessel, multidevice unstaged intervention with coronary artery bypass surgery: A single-center experience.
    Kiesz, RS
    Rozek, MM
    Sepeda, JM
    Chang, CW
    Patel, V
    Sako, EY
    Miller, OL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (7A): : 58S - 58S
  • [20] Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Malignancy: A Single-Center Study with Comparison to Patients Without Malignancy
    Kucukarslan, Nezihi
    Tatar, Tolga
    Uzun, Mehmet
    Yavuz, Izzet
    Ozal, Ertugrul
    Tatar, Harun
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2009, 24 (02) : 151 - 155