A phase I study of sequential intravenous topotecan and etoposide in lung cancer patients

被引:6
|
作者
Huisman, C
Postmus, PE
Giaccone, G
Smit, EF
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam Hosp, Dept Pulm Dis, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Free Univ Amsterdam Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
etoposide; lung cancer; NSCLC; SCLC; topoisomerase inhibitors; topotecan;
D O I
10.1023/A:1013171928472
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan (T) and the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide (E) are active drugs in lung cancer. The complementary functions of their targets may suggest benefit from the combined use of these agents but drug scheduling has been shown to play a critical role in preclinical models. To establish the optimal schedule and assess the impact of sequential administration of the combination of T and E, we conducted a dose finding study of sequential intravenous T and E in a four-weekly-schedule in relapsed lung cancer patients. Patients and methods: The importance of drug sequence was assessed in consecutive patients throughout all dose levels; patients received in the first course either T followed by E (the TE group: T on days 1-3 and E on days 4-6) or E before T (the ET group: E on days 1-3 and T on days 4-6). The sequence of T and E was alternated in the successive courses. In this cross-over design, each patient served as his own control for analysis of hematological toxicity in which TE sequence was compared to that of the ET sequence. Moreover, hematological toxicity after the first course was compared between the TE and the ET groups. The starting dose was T/E 0.75/75 mg/m(2) at dose level 1 and dose escalation was planned to T/E 1.00/75 mg/m(2) at dose level 2, T/E 1.00/100 mg/m(2) at dose level 3, T/E 1.25/100 mg/m(2) at dose level 4 and T/E 1.50/100 mg/m(2) at dose level 5. Nineteen patients (small-cell lung cancer 7, non-small-cell lung cancer 11, mesothelioma 1 patient) were included. Results: The principal toxicity was myelosuppression, primarily neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. At dose level 3 several grade 4 toxicities were observed. DLT (febrile neutropenia) occurred in two patients, one in the TE and one in the ET group and precluded further dose escalation. There was no significant difference in WBC and platelet nadirs during the first course between the TE and the ET group. The influence of the sequence of administration of topotecan and etoposide was calculated by comparing the nadir values of cycles I and II for each patient. For none of the dose levels, a significant sequence-dependent effect could be detected. The MTD was reached at the doses of 100 mg/m(2) topotecan and 75 mg/m(2) etoposide. No objective responses were seen. Conclusion: Although the combined use of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors is attractive on theoretical grounds, excessive myelosuppression prevents substantial dose escalation.
引用
收藏
页码:1567 / 1573
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Phase I trial of sequential topotecan followed by etoposide in adults with myeloid leukemia: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study
    M Crump
    J Lipton
    D Hedley
    D Sutton
    F Shepherd
    M Minden
    K Stewart
    S Beare
    E Eisenhauer
    Leukemia, 1999, 13 : 343 - 347
  • [22] A phase I clinical study of the sequential administration of paclitaxel (P) followed by oral topotecan (T) and etoposide (E) in patients with solid tumors.
    Lima, CMSR
    Catapano, CV
    Sherman, CA
    Mushtaq, CM
    Pacheco, D
    Harper, M
    Lightcap, KD
    Fields, SZ
    Green, MR
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 1999, 5 : 3798S - 3798S
  • [23] Phase I dose escalation study of vinorelbine and topotecan combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent lung cancer
    Matthew A Beldner
    Carol A Sherman
    Mark R Green
    Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
    Uzair Chaudhary
    Mario L Meyer
    Andrew S Kraft
    Alberto J Montero
    BMC Cancer, 7
  • [24] Phase I dose escalation study of vinorelbine and topotecan combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent lung cancer
    Beldner, Matthew A.
    Sherman, Carol A.
    Green, Mark R.
    Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth
    Chaudhary, Uzair
    Meyer, Mario L.
    Kraft, Andrew S.
    Montero, Alberto J.
    BMC CANCER, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [25] Treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer refractory to etoposide and cisplatin with the topoisomerase I poison topotecan
    PerezSoler, R
    Glisson, BS
    Lee, JS
    Fossella, FV
    Murphy, WK
    Shin, DM
    Hong, WK
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (10) : 2785 - 2790
  • [26] Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of topotecan (T) in combination with oral etoposide (E)
    Herben, VMM
    Huinink, WWT
    Rodenhuis, S
    Schornagel, JH
    Beijnen, JH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A : 940 - 940
  • [27] Phase II study of topotecan and cisplatin with sequential radiotherapy in elderly small cell lung cancer patients (Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group; OLCSG 0102).
    Kubo, Toshio
    Harita, Shingo
    Okada, Toshiaki
    Kamei, Haruhito
    Hosokawa, Shinobu
    Maeda, Tadashi
    Kozuki, Toshiyuki
    Fujiwara, Keiichi
    Hotta, Katsuyuki
    Takigawa, Nagio
    Tanimoto, Mitsune
    Kiura, Katsuyuki
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [28] Phase II comparator study of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with chemosensitive small-cell lung cancer
    von Pawel, J
    Gatzemeier, U
    Pujol, JL
    Moreau, L
    Bildat, S
    Ranson, M
    Richardson, G
    Steppert, C
    Rivière, A
    Camlett, I
    Lane, S
    Ross, G
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) : 1743 - 1749
  • [29] Phase I Trial of Carboplatin and Etoposide in Combination with Panobinostat in Patients with Lung Cancer
    Tarhini, Ahmad A.
    Zahoor, Harts
    Mclaughlin, Brian
    Gooding, William E.
    Schmitz, John C.
    Siegfried, Jill M.
    Socinski, Mark A.
    Argiris, Athanassios
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (10) : 4475 - 4481
  • [30] Topotecan and etoposide first line chemotherapy of advanced small cell lung cancer. A phase II study
    Ciuleanu, TE
    Curca, R
    Iancu, D
    Todor, N
    Cebotaru, C
    Radulescu, IL
    Banu, E
    Ghilezan, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, : 437 - 437