A phase I study of sequential intravenous topotecan and etoposide in lung cancer patients

被引:6
|
作者
Huisman, C
Postmus, PE
Giaccone, G
Smit, EF
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam Hosp, Dept Pulm Dis, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Free Univ Amsterdam Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
etoposide; lung cancer; NSCLC; SCLC; topoisomerase inhibitors; topotecan;
D O I
10.1023/A:1013171928472
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan (T) and the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide (E) are active drugs in lung cancer. The complementary functions of their targets may suggest benefit from the combined use of these agents but drug scheduling has been shown to play a critical role in preclinical models. To establish the optimal schedule and assess the impact of sequential administration of the combination of T and E, we conducted a dose finding study of sequential intravenous T and E in a four-weekly-schedule in relapsed lung cancer patients. Patients and methods: The importance of drug sequence was assessed in consecutive patients throughout all dose levels; patients received in the first course either T followed by E (the TE group: T on days 1-3 and E on days 4-6) or E before T (the ET group: E on days 1-3 and T on days 4-6). The sequence of T and E was alternated in the successive courses. In this cross-over design, each patient served as his own control for analysis of hematological toxicity in which TE sequence was compared to that of the ET sequence. Moreover, hematological toxicity after the first course was compared between the TE and the ET groups. The starting dose was T/E 0.75/75 mg/m(2) at dose level 1 and dose escalation was planned to T/E 1.00/75 mg/m(2) at dose level 2, T/E 1.00/100 mg/m(2) at dose level 3, T/E 1.25/100 mg/m(2) at dose level 4 and T/E 1.50/100 mg/m(2) at dose level 5. Nineteen patients (small-cell lung cancer 7, non-small-cell lung cancer 11, mesothelioma 1 patient) were included. Results: The principal toxicity was myelosuppression, primarily neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. At dose level 3 several grade 4 toxicities were observed. DLT (febrile neutropenia) occurred in two patients, one in the TE and one in the ET group and precluded further dose escalation. There was no significant difference in WBC and platelet nadirs during the first course between the TE and the ET group. The influence of the sequence of administration of topotecan and etoposide was calculated by comparing the nadir values of cycles I and II for each patient. For none of the dose levels, a significant sequence-dependent effect could be detected. The MTD was reached at the doses of 100 mg/m(2) topotecan and 75 mg/m(2) etoposide. No objective responses were seen. Conclusion: Although the combined use of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors is attractive on theoretical grounds, excessive myelosuppression prevents substantial dose escalation.
引用
收藏
页码:1567 / 1573
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pharmacokinetically guided phase I trial of topotecan and etoposide phosphate in recurrent ovarian cancer
    N C Levitt
    D J Propper
    S Madhusudan
    J P Braybrooke
    C Echeta
    R te Poele
    S L Davies
    E Flanagan
    I D Hickson
    S Joel
    T S Ganesan
    British Journal of Cancer, 2005, 93 : 60 - 69
  • [32] A phase I study of a 5-day schedule of IV topotecan (T) and etoposide (E) in untreated small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
    Sutton, P
    Clark, PI
    Smith, DB
    Marshall, E
    Hannigan, K
    Ross, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 : 26 - 26
  • [33] Cisplatin-etoposide alternating with topotecan in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) - A multicenter phase II study
    Mavroudis, D
    Veslemes, M
    Kouroussis, C
    Tzanakis, N
    Ferdoutsis, E
    Toumbis, M
    Ziotopoulos, P
    Agelidou, M
    Tselepatiotis, E
    Kalbakis, K
    Souglakos, J
    Magkanas, E
    Samonis, G
    Georgoulias, V
    LUNG CANCER, 2002, 38 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [34] Pharmacokinetically guided phase I trial of topotecan and etoposide phosphate in recurrent ovarian cancer
    Levitt, NC
    Propper, DJ
    Madhusudan, S
    Braybrooke, JP
    Echeta, C
    Poele, RT
    Davies, SL
    Flanagan, E
    Hickson, ID
    Joel, S
    Ganesan, TS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (01) : 60 - 69
  • [35] A phase I study of intraperitoneal topotecan in combination with intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer
    Bos, AME
    De Vos, FYFL
    de Vries, EGE
    Beijnen, JH
    Rosing, H
    Mourits, MJE
    van der Zee, AGJ
    Gietema, JA
    Willemse, PHB
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (04) : 539 - 548
  • [36] A phase I study of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in small cell lung cancer
    Kelly, K
    Wood, ME
    Bunn, PA
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1999, 26 (01) : 77 - 77
  • [37] A phase I study of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in small cell lung cancer
    Bunn, PA
    Kelly, K
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1997, 24 (04) : 144 - 148
  • [38] CARBOPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE IN ADVANCED LUNG-CANCER - A PHASE-I STUDY
    LIIPPO, K
    NIKKANEN, V
    HEINONEN, E
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 27 (03) : 229 - 233
  • [39] A phase I study of weekly oral topotecan in patients (pts) with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
    Kontopodis, E.
    Vamvakas, L.
    Kalbakis, K.
    Vardakis, N. K.
    Sfakiotaki, G.
    Georgoulias, V.
    Agelaki, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [40] Phase III Study Comparing Sequential Versus Alternate Administration of Cisplatin-Etoposide and Topotecan as First-line Treatment in Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Baka, Sophia
    Agelaki, Sophia
    Kotsakis, Athanasios
    Veslemes, Marinos
    Papakotoulas, Pavlos
    Agelidou, Maria
    Agelidou, Athina
    Tsaroucha, Emily
    Pavlakou, Georgia
    Gerogianni, Aleka
    Androulakis, Nikolaos
    Vamvakas, Lambros
    Kalbakis, Kostas
    Mavroudis, Dimitris
    Georgoulias, Vassilis
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (07) : 3031 - 3038