Phase II comparator study of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with chemosensitive small-cell lung cancer

被引:167
|
作者
von Pawel, J
Gatzemeier, U
Pujol, JL
Moreau, L
Bildat, S
Ranson, M
Richardson, G
Steppert, C
Rivière, A
Camlett, I
Lane, S
Ross, G
机构
[1] Asklepios Fachklin, D-82131 Gauting, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany
[3] W German Canc Ctr, Essen, Germany
[4] Hosp Dis Resp Organs, Ebensfield, Germany
[5] Hop Arnaud Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
[6] CHU Strasbourg, Hop Lyautey, Strasbourg, France
[7] Ctr Francois Baclesse, F-14021 Caen, France
[8] Christie Hosp, Manchester, Lancs, England
[9] SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceut, Harlow CM19 5AD, Essex, England
[10] Monash Med Ctr, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[11] SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceut, Collegeville, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1743
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Topotecan, administered intravenously, is active in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), In this study, the comparability of oral topotecan to IV topotecan was investigated. Patients and Methods: Patients with SCLC that herd relapsed 90 days or more after cessation of initial chemotherapy were randomized to receive either oral topotecan (Hycamtin) 2.3 mg/m(2)/d x 5 (52 patients) or IV topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2)/d x 5 (54 patients), every 21 days. Results: Response rates in this phase II randomized study were 23% (12/52) in the oral topotecan arm and 15% (8/54) in the IV topotecan arm. All radiological responses were confirmed by an independent radiologist. Median survival was 32 weeks (oral) and 25 weeks (IV), Good symptom control, defined as sustained improvement or no deterioration, was evident in both treatment groups. Topotecan was generally well tolerated, with myelosuppression being the major toxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 35.3% of patients on oral topotecan and in 67.3% of patients on IV topotecan, which was statistically significant (P = .001). Fever/infection more than or equal to grade 2 associated with grade 4 neutropenia, together with sepsis, occurred in only 5.1% of courses (oral) and 3.3% of courses (IV). Non-hematological toxicity consisted mainly of vomiting (oral: 36.5% of patients; IV: 31.5% of patients) and nausea (oral: 26.9% of patients; IV: 40.7% of patients). Conclusion: This study found oral topotecan to be similar in efficacy to IV topotecan in the treatment of patients with relapsed SCLC, sensitive to first-line chemotherapy, with less grade 4 neutropenia and greater convenience of administration. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1743 / 1749
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer
    Eckardt, John R.
    von Pawel, Joachim
    Pujol, Jean-Louis
    Papai, Zsolt
    Quoix, Elisabeth
    Ardizzoni, Andrea
    Poulin, Ruth
    Preston, Alaknanda J.
    Dane, Graham
    Ross, Graham
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (15) : 2086 - 2092
  • [2] A Randomized Phase II Study of Linsitinib (OSI-906) Versus Topotecan in Patients With Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Chiappori, Alberto A.
    Otterson, Gregory A.
    Dowlati, Afshin
    Traynor, Anne M.
    Horn, Leora
    Owonikoko, Taofeek K.
    Ross, Helen J.
    Hann, Christine L.
    Abu Hejleh, Taher
    Nieva, Jorge
    Zhao, Xiuhua
    Schell, Amichael
    Sullivan, Daniel M.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2016, 21 (10): : 1163 - 1164
  • [3] Is Intravenous and Oral Topotecan in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Truly Equal? A Case Report
    Deraedt, Davien
    Verfaillie, Saartje
    Wynants, Jokke
    Cuppens, Kristof
    CASE REPORTS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 17 (01): : 1140 - 1145
  • [4] Phase II study of topotecan and paclitaxel for patients with previously untreated extensive stage small-cell lung cancer
    Ramalingam, S
    Belani, CP
    Day, R
    Zamboni, BA
    Jacobs, SA
    Jett, JR
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 (02) : 247 - 251
  • [5] A Phase II Study of Higher Dose Weekly Topotecan in Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Spigel, David R.
    Greco, F. Anthony
    Burris, Howard A., III
    Shipley, Dianna L.
    Clark, Bobby L.
    Whorf, Robert C.
    Arrowsmith, Edward R.
    Hainsworth, John D.
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2011, 12 (03) : 187 - 191
  • [6] A phase I and pharmacological study of amrubicin and topotecan in patients of small-cell lung cancer with relapsed or extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer
    Shibayama, Takuo
    Hotta, Katsuyuki
    Takigawa, Nagio
    Tada, Atsuhiko
    Ueoka, Hiroshi
    Harita, Shingo
    Kiura, Katsuyuki
    Tabata, Masahiro
    Segawa, Yoshihiko
    Nogami, Naoyuki
    Kuyama, Shoichi
    Shinkai, Tetsu
    Tanimoto, Mitsune
    LUNG CANCER, 2006, 53 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [7] Phase II study of oral topotecan in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    White, SC
    Cheeseman, S
    Thatcher, N
    Anderson, H
    Carrington, B
    Hearn, S
    Ross, G
    Ranson, M
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2000, 6 (03) : 868 - 873
  • [8] Phase II Study of Topotecan with Cisplatin in Japanese Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Hosomi, Yukio
    Shibuya, Masahiko
    Niho, Seiji
    Ichinose, Yukito
    Kiura, Katsuyuki
    Sakai, Hiroshi
    Takeda, Koji
    Kudo, Shinzo
    Eguchi, Kenji
    Matsui, Kaoru
    Masuda, Noriyuki
    Ando, Masahiro
    Watanabe, Koshiro
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (10) : 3449 - 3456
  • [9] A phase II study of carboplatin and prolonged administration of oral etoposide in patients with small-cell lung cancer
    Minami, H
    Saka, H
    Sakai, S
    Yamamoto, M
    Shimokata, K
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1997, 36 (07) : 765 - 769
  • [10] A randomised phase II study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous topotecan in combination with either cisplatin or etoposide in patients with untreated extensive disease small-cell lung cancer
    Quoix, E
    Breton, JL
    Gervais, R
    Wilson, J
    Schramel, F
    Cardenal, F
    Ross, G
    Preston, A
    Lymboura, M
    Mattson, K
    LUNG CANCER, 2005, 49 (02) : 253 - 261