Phase II comparator study of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with chemosensitive small-cell lung cancer

被引:167
|
作者
von Pawel, J
Gatzemeier, U
Pujol, JL
Moreau, L
Bildat, S
Ranson, M
Richardson, G
Steppert, C
Rivière, A
Camlett, I
Lane, S
Ross, G
机构
[1] Asklepios Fachklin, D-82131 Gauting, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany
[3] W German Canc Ctr, Essen, Germany
[4] Hosp Dis Resp Organs, Ebensfield, Germany
[5] Hop Arnaud Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
[6] CHU Strasbourg, Hop Lyautey, Strasbourg, France
[7] Ctr Francois Baclesse, F-14021 Caen, France
[8] Christie Hosp, Manchester, Lancs, England
[9] SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceut, Harlow CM19 5AD, Essex, England
[10] Monash Med Ctr, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[11] SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceut, Collegeville, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1743
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Topotecan, administered intravenously, is active in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), In this study, the comparability of oral topotecan to IV topotecan was investigated. Patients and Methods: Patients with SCLC that herd relapsed 90 days or more after cessation of initial chemotherapy were randomized to receive either oral topotecan (Hycamtin) 2.3 mg/m(2)/d x 5 (52 patients) or IV topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2)/d x 5 (54 patients), every 21 days. Results: Response rates in this phase II randomized study were 23% (12/52) in the oral topotecan arm and 15% (8/54) in the IV topotecan arm. All radiological responses were confirmed by an independent radiologist. Median survival was 32 weeks (oral) and 25 weeks (IV), Good symptom control, defined as sustained improvement or no deterioration, was evident in both treatment groups. Topotecan was generally well tolerated, with myelosuppression being the major toxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 35.3% of patients on oral topotecan and in 67.3% of patients on IV topotecan, which was statistically significant (P = .001). Fever/infection more than or equal to grade 2 associated with grade 4 neutropenia, together with sepsis, occurred in only 5.1% of courses (oral) and 3.3% of courses (IV). Non-hematological toxicity consisted mainly of vomiting (oral: 36.5% of patients; IV: 31.5% of patients) and nausea (oral: 26.9% of patients; IV: 40.7% of patients). Conclusion: This study found oral topotecan to be similar in efficacy to IV topotecan in the treatment of patients with relapsed SCLC, sensitive to first-line chemotherapy, with less grade 4 neutropenia and greater convenience of administration. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1743 / 1749
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Feasibility of oral topotecan in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer ineligible for standard therapy
    Eckardt, JR
    ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 : 42 - 46
  • [32] Randomized Phase III Trial of Amrubicin Versus Topotecan As Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    von Pawel, Joachim
    Jotte, Robert
    Spigel, David R.
    O'Brien, Mary E. R.
    Socinski, Mark A.
    Mezger, Joerg
    Steins, Martin
    Bosquee, Leon
    Bubis, Jeffrey
    Nackaerts, Kristiaan
    Trigo, Jose M.
    Clingan, Philip
    Schuette, Wolfgang
    Lorigan, Paul
    Reck, Martin
    Domine, Manuel
    Shepherd, Frances A.
    Li, Shaoyi
    Renschler, Markus F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (35) : 4012 - U160
  • [33] Oral topotecan in platinum-refractory small-cell lung cancer: A cancer network experience
    Stephens, P.
    Woolcock, S.
    Gardiner, J.
    LUNG CANCER, 2011, 71 : S40 - S40
  • [34] Phase II trial of carboplatin plus oral etoposide for elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer
    Matsui, K
    Masuda, N
    Fukuoka, M
    Yana, T
    Hirashima, T
    Komiya, T
    Kobayashi, M
    Kawahara, M
    Atagi, S
    Ogawara, M
    Negoro, S
    Kudoh, S
    Furuse, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 77 (11) : 1961 - 1965
  • [35] Phase II trial of carboplatin plus oral etoposide for elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer
    K Matsui
    N Masuda
    M Fukuoka
    T Yana
    T Hirashima
    T Komiya
    M Kobayashi
    M Kawahara
    S Atagi
    M Ogawara
    S Negoro
    S Kudoh
    K Furuse
    British Journal of Cancer, 1998, 77 : 1961 - 1965
  • [36] A phase I trial of a 5-day schedule of intravenous topotecan and etoposide in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer
    O'Neill, P
    Clark, PI
    Smith, D
    Marshall, E
    Hannigan, K
    Ross, G
    ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 : 25 - 29
  • [37] Phase I Study of Topotecan and Cisplatin in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Ichinose, Yukito
    Seto, Takashi
    Nishiwaki, Yutaka
    Kiura, Katsuyuki
    Sakai, Hiroshi
    Yokoyama, Akira
    Segawa, Yoshihiko
    Ando, Masahiro
    Watanabe, Koshiro
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 41 (02) : 197 - 203
  • [38] A dose escalation study of topotecan in combination with epirubicin in pretreated patients with small-cell lung cancer
    Agelaki, S
    Kakolyris, S
    Palamidas, P
    Kouroussis, C
    Mavroudis, D
    Kalbakis, K
    Georgoulias, V
    Raptis, A
    LUNG CANCER, 2001, 34 (01) : 133 - 139
  • [39] Phase II study of topotecan in refractory and sensitive small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
    Ardizzoni, A
    Hansen, HH
    Dombernowsky, P
    Kaplan, S
    Postmus, PE
    Gamucci, T
    Schaefer, B
    Wanders, J
    Verweij, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A : 84 - 84
  • [40] Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer
    von Pawel, J
    Schiller, JH
    Shepherd, FA
    Fields, SZ
    Kleisbauer, JP
    Chrysson, NG
    Stewart, DJ
    Clark, PI
    Palmer, MC
    Depierre, A
    Carmichael, J
    Krebs, JB
    Ross, G
    Lane, SR
    Gralla, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (02) : 658 - 667