Imaging Features of Breast Cancer Subtypes on Mammography and Ultrasonography: an Analysis of 479 Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Pulappadi, Vishnu Prasad [1 ]
Dhamija, Ekta [1 ]
Baby, Akhil [1 ]
Mathur, Sandeep [2 ]
Pandey, Shivam [3 ]
Gogia, Ajay [4 ]
Deo, S. V. S. [5 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dr BR Ambedkar Inst Rotary Canc Hosp, Dept Radiodiag & Intervent Radiol, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Pathol, New Delhi 110029, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Biostat, New Delhi 110029, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Med Oncol, New Delhi 110029, India
[5] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Surg Oncol, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
Breast cancer; Mammography; Ultrasonography; Triple negative breast cancer; MOLECULAR SUBTYPES; CHEMOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATIONS; ULTRASOUND; SURVIVAL; PLUS;
D O I
10.1007/s13193-022-01606-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To compare features of clinically defined subtypes of breast cancer on mammography (MG) and ultrasonography (USG). After obtaining approval from the institute ethics committee, a retrospective observational study was performed on biopsy-proven breast cancer patients who underwent baseline MG from 2016 to 2020. MG and USG features were evaluated and the patients were classified based on immunohistochemistry profile into luminal like (LL)-oestrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) + , Her2neu-; basal like (BL)-ER/PR-, Her2neu-; Her2 like (HL)-Her2neu + . A total of 479 patients (mean age, 51.4 +/- 11.7 years; all females) were included: LL-198 (41.3%), BL-121 (25.2%) and HL-160 (33.3%). On MG, round shape (21/115, 18.3%, p < 0.001); circumscribed (16/115, 13.9%, p < 0.001) and microlobulated margins (28/115, 24.4%) were associated with BL tumours. Associated suspicious calcifications (96/160, 60%, p < 0.001) and skin thickening or retraction (75/149, 50.3%, p < 0.001) were more common in HL. On USG, round shape (12/95, 12.8%, p = 0.005); circumscribed (8/94, 8.5%) and microlobulated margins (44/94, 46.8%) and posterior acoustic enhancement (7/95, 7.5%, p = 0.012) were associated with BL. The logistic regression analysis revealed that spiculated margins on MG favoured LL (OR: 8.5, p = 0.001); round shape (OR: 6.8), circumscribed (OR: 10.8) or microlobulated margins (OR: 3.5) (p < 0.001 for each) favoured BL; whereas associated features of calcifications (OR: 3.3) (p = 0.019) and skin retraction or thickening (OR: 1.8) (p < 0.001) favoured HL. On USG, circumscribed (OR: 5.9, p = 0.005) or microlobulated margins (OR: 3, p < 0.001) and posterior acoustic enhancement (OR: 9.5, p = 0.006) favoured BL. Clinically defined subtypes of breast cancer show significant differences in the imaging appearances on mammography and USG. BL tumours may not show the typical imaging features of malignancy, necessitating clinicopathological correlation for accurate diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 938
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging
    Satake, H
    Shimamoto, K
    Sawaki, A
    Niimi, R
    Ando, Y
    Ishiguchi, T
    Ishigaki, T
    Yamakawa, K
    Nagasaka, T
    Funahashi, H
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (11) : 1726 - 1732
  • [42] Correlation Analysis of Digital Mammography, Ultrasonography, and Pathologic Features in Pure Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast (PIMPC)
    Sui, Xulei
    Feng, Peipei
    Sun, Xiaoyuan
    Liang, Peng
    Liu, Ying
    Zhang, Guowei
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2024, 16 : 245 - 252
  • [43] CORRELATION OF BREAST CANCER TUMOR SIZE BY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND MAMMOGRAPHY ACCORDING TO MENOPAUSAL STATUS
    Pop, C. Stanciu
    Veys, I.
    Van De Merckt, C.
    Drisis, S.
    Radermecker, M.
    Moreau, M.
    Larsimont, D.
    Pop, C. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A168 - A168
  • [44] Impact of breast size and composition on the accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography in breast cancer screening
    Nakamura, Akira
    Ohnuki, Koji
    Takahashi, Haruka
    Usami, Shin
    Ishida, Yuki
    Shibata, Setsuko
    Umemura, Akiko
    Kano, Atsushi
    BREAST CANCER, 2025, 32 (02) : 385 - 392
  • [45] Radiology-pathology correlation of hormonal subtypes of breast cancer based on mammography, ultrasound, and PET imaging
    Dsilva, Rithi Melissa
    Shivalingappa, Shivakumar Swamy
    Sampangi, Sudhakar
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01):
  • [46] Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
    Wang, Simin
    Wang, Zhenxun
    Li, Ruimin
    You, Chao
    Mao, Ning
    Jiang, Tingting
    Wang, Zhongyi
    Xie, Haizhu
    Gu, Yajia
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 12 (02) : 1270 - +
  • [47] Radiomics Integration of Mammography and DCE-MRI for Predicting Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Patients
    Yang, Xianwei
    Li, Jing
    Sun, Hang
    Chen, Jing
    Xie, Jin
    Peng, Yonghui
    Shang, Tao
    Pan, Tongyong
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2025, 17 : 187 - 200
  • [48] THE INFLUENCE OF BREAST CANCER BIOLOGICAL FEATURES ON PROBABILITY TO DIAGNOSE BREAST CANCER BY MAMMOGRAPHY
    Chikman, B.
    Lavy, R.
    Stahl-Kent, V.
    Davidson, T.
    Halevy, A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 : 46 - 46
  • [49] Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Radiomics Analysis for Preoperative Prediction of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes
    Zhu, Shuangshuang
    Wang, Simin
    Guo, Sailing
    Wu, Ruoxi
    Zhang, Jinggang
    Kong, Mengyu
    Pan, Liang
    Gu, Yajia
    Yu, Shengnan
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) : 2228 - 2238
  • [50] Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Replace Mammography and Ultrasonography for the Detection of Breast Lesions?
    Yilmaz, Yeliz
    Bener, Gulten Sezgin
    Atahan, Kemal
    Acar, Nihan
    Acar, Turan
    Kar, Haldun
    Tosun, Furkan
    Gokova, Melek
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (05)