Imaging Features of Breast Cancer Subtypes on Mammography and Ultrasonography: an Analysis of 479 Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Pulappadi, Vishnu Prasad [1 ]
Dhamija, Ekta [1 ]
Baby, Akhil [1 ]
Mathur, Sandeep [2 ]
Pandey, Shivam [3 ]
Gogia, Ajay [4 ]
Deo, S. V. S. [5 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dr BR Ambedkar Inst Rotary Canc Hosp, Dept Radiodiag & Intervent Radiol, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Pathol, New Delhi 110029, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Biostat, New Delhi 110029, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Med Oncol, New Delhi 110029, India
[5] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Surg Oncol, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
Breast cancer; Mammography; Ultrasonography; Triple negative breast cancer; MOLECULAR SUBTYPES; CHEMOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATIONS; ULTRASOUND; SURVIVAL; PLUS;
D O I
10.1007/s13193-022-01606-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To compare features of clinically defined subtypes of breast cancer on mammography (MG) and ultrasonography (USG). After obtaining approval from the institute ethics committee, a retrospective observational study was performed on biopsy-proven breast cancer patients who underwent baseline MG from 2016 to 2020. MG and USG features were evaluated and the patients were classified based on immunohistochemistry profile into luminal like (LL)-oestrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) + , Her2neu-; basal like (BL)-ER/PR-, Her2neu-; Her2 like (HL)-Her2neu + . A total of 479 patients (mean age, 51.4 +/- 11.7 years; all females) were included: LL-198 (41.3%), BL-121 (25.2%) and HL-160 (33.3%). On MG, round shape (21/115, 18.3%, p < 0.001); circumscribed (16/115, 13.9%, p < 0.001) and microlobulated margins (28/115, 24.4%) were associated with BL tumours. Associated suspicious calcifications (96/160, 60%, p < 0.001) and skin thickening or retraction (75/149, 50.3%, p < 0.001) were more common in HL. On USG, round shape (12/95, 12.8%, p = 0.005); circumscribed (8/94, 8.5%) and microlobulated margins (44/94, 46.8%) and posterior acoustic enhancement (7/95, 7.5%, p = 0.012) were associated with BL. The logistic regression analysis revealed that spiculated margins on MG favoured LL (OR: 8.5, p = 0.001); round shape (OR: 6.8), circumscribed (OR: 10.8) or microlobulated margins (OR: 3.5) (p < 0.001 for each) favoured BL; whereas associated features of calcifications (OR: 3.3) (p = 0.019) and skin retraction or thickening (OR: 1.8) (p < 0.001) favoured HL. On USG, circumscribed (OR: 5.9, p = 0.005) or microlobulated margins (OR: 3, p < 0.001) and posterior acoustic enhancement (OR: 9.5, p = 0.006) favoured BL. Clinically defined subtypes of breast cancer show significant differences in the imaging appearances on mammography and USG. BL tumours may not show the typical imaging features of malignancy, necessitating clinicopathological correlation for accurate diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 938
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Questionnaire Survey on Breast Diagnostic Imaging Techniques: Subjective Impression of Mammography, Conventional Ultrasonography, and Automated Breast Ultrasonography
    Okamura, Takanori
    Ohta, Tomoyuki
    Tsujimoto, Fumio
    Sakurai, Masaru
    Okazaki, Hiroko
    Okamoto, Kyouko
    Kanemaki, Yoshihide
    Nakajima, Yasuo
    Fukuda, Mamoru
    Suka, Machi
    Nobuoka, Sachihiko
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2010, 18 (04) : 153 - 157
  • [32] Eccrine Hidradenoma Mimicking Primary Breast Cancer on Mammography and Ultrasonography
    Ryu, Min Jung
    Kim, Youngseon
    Lee, Seungeun
    Choi, Joon Hyuk
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (02)
  • [33] MRI versus Ultrasonography and Mammography for Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer
    Wasif, Nabil
    Garreau, Jennifer
    Terando, Alicia
    Kirsch, Daniel
    Mund, Debra F.
    Giuliano, Armando E.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2009, 75 (10) : 970 - 975
  • [34] Low Rates of Additional Cancer Detection by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients Who Undergo Preoperative Mammography and Ultrasonography
    Kim, Jisun
    Han, Wonshik
    Moon, Hyeong-Gon
    Ahn, Soo Kyung
    Shin, Hee-Chul
    You, Jee-Man
    Chang, Jung Min
    Cho, Nariya
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Park, In-Ae
    Noh, Dong-Young
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2014, 17 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [35] Comparison of Mammography and Ultrasonography for Tumor Size of DCIS of Breast Cancer
    Wang, Yu
    Wang, Jiantao
    Wang, Haiping
    Yang, Xinyu
    Chang, Liming
    Li, Qi
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS, 2019, 15 (02) : 209 - 213
  • [36] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF BREAST IMPLANTS - COMPARISON WITH MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    YOUSSEFZADEH, S
    HITTMAIR, K
    POKIESER, P
    WIESBAUER, P
    BALDT, M
    WOLF, G
    IMHOF, H
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1994, 119 (43) : 1453 - 1457
  • [37] Retrospective study comparing mammography alone and combination of ultrasonography and mammography in breast cancer screening
    Sugimoto, T.
    Okamoto, Y.
    Suehiro, F.
    Nakauchi, Y.
    Oki, T.
    Maho, O.
    Dabanaka, K.
    Hanazaki, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 92 : S31 - S32
  • [38] Role of Ultrasonography in Breast Cancer Imaging
    Alnaimy, Noor M.
    Khoumais, Nuha
    PET CLINICS, 2009, 4 (03) : 227 - 240
  • [39] Breast Cancer Tumor Size Assessment with Mammography, Ultrasonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging at a Community Based Multidisciplinary Breast Center
    Ramirez, Sarah Ines
    Scholle, Max
    Buckmaster, Jennifer
    Paley, Robert Hunter
    Kowdley, Gopal Chandru
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2012, 78 (04) : 440 - 446
  • [40] Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging
    H. Satake
    K. Shimamoto
    A. Sawaki
    R. Niimi
    Y. Ando
    T. Ishiguchi
    T. Ishigaki
    K. Yamakawa
    T. Nagasaka
    H. Funahashi
    European Radiology, 2000, 10 : 1726 - 1732