Imaging Features of Breast Cancer Subtypes on Mammography and Ultrasonography: an Analysis of 479 Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Pulappadi, Vishnu Prasad [1 ]
Dhamija, Ekta [1 ]
Baby, Akhil [1 ]
Mathur, Sandeep [2 ]
Pandey, Shivam [3 ]
Gogia, Ajay [4 ]
Deo, S. V. S. [5 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dr BR Ambedkar Inst Rotary Canc Hosp, Dept Radiodiag & Intervent Radiol, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Pathol, New Delhi 110029, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Biostat, New Delhi 110029, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Med Oncol, New Delhi 110029, India
[5] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Surg Oncol, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
Breast cancer; Mammography; Ultrasonography; Triple negative breast cancer; MOLECULAR SUBTYPES; CHEMOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATIONS; ULTRASOUND; SURVIVAL; PLUS;
D O I
10.1007/s13193-022-01606-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To compare features of clinically defined subtypes of breast cancer on mammography (MG) and ultrasonography (USG). After obtaining approval from the institute ethics committee, a retrospective observational study was performed on biopsy-proven breast cancer patients who underwent baseline MG from 2016 to 2020. MG and USG features were evaluated and the patients were classified based on immunohistochemistry profile into luminal like (LL)-oestrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) + , Her2neu-; basal like (BL)-ER/PR-, Her2neu-; Her2 like (HL)-Her2neu + . A total of 479 patients (mean age, 51.4 +/- 11.7 years; all females) were included: LL-198 (41.3%), BL-121 (25.2%) and HL-160 (33.3%). On MG, round shape (21/115, 18.3%, p < 0.001); circumscribed (16/115, 13.9%, p < 0.001) and microlobulated margins (28/115, 24.4%) were associated with BL tumours. Associated suspicious calcifications (96/160, 60%, p < 0.001) and skin thickening or retraction (75/149, 50.3%, p < 0.001) were more common in HL. On USG, round shape (12/95, 12.8%, p = 0.005); circumscribed (8/94, 8.5%) and microlobulated margins (44/94, 46.8%) and posterior acoustic enhancement (7/95, 7.5%, p = 0.012) were associated with BL. The logistic regression analysis revealed that spiculated margins on MG favoured LL (OR: 8.5, p = 0.001); round shape (OR: 6.8), circumscribed (OR: 10.8) or microlobulated margins (OR: 3.5) (p < 0.001 for each) favoured BL; whereas associated features of calcifications (OR: 3.3) (p = 0.019) and skin retraction or thickening (OR: 1.8) (p < 0.001) favoured HL. On USG, circumscribed (OR: 5.9, p = 0.005) or microlobulated margins (OR: 3, p < 0.001) and posterior acoustic enhancement (OR: 9.5, p = 0.006) favoured BL. Clinically defined subtypes of breast cancer show significant differences in the imaging appearances on mammography and USG. BL tumours may not show the typical imaging features of malignancy, necessitating clinicopathological correlation for accurate diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 938
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk
    Glechner, Anna
    Wagner, Gernot
    Mitus, Jerzy W.
    Teufer, Birgit
    Klerings, Irma
    Bock, Nina
    Grillich, Ludwig
    Berzaczy, Dominik
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (03):
  • [22] Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Thaler, Kylie
    Chapman, Andrea
    Kaminski-Hartenthaler, Angela
    Berzaczy, Dominik
    Van Noord, Megan G.
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (04):
  • [23] Imaging features of automated breast volume scanner: Correlation with molecular subtypes of breast cancer
    Zheng, Feng-Yang
    Lu, Qing
    Huang, Bei-Jian
    Xia, Han-Sheng
    Yan, Li-Xia
    Wang, Xi
    Yuan, Wei
    Wang, Wen-Ping
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 86 : 267 - 275
  • [24] Accuracy of Breast Ultrasonography and Mammography in Comparison with Postoperative Histopathology in Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Schmidt, Gilda
    Findeklee, Sebastian
    Martinez, Gerda del Sol
    Georgescu, Mihai-Teodor
    Gerlinger, Christoph
    Nemat, Sogand
    Klamminger, Gilbert Georg
    Nigdelis, Meletios P.
    Solomayer, Erich-Franz
    Hamoud, Bashar Haj
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (17)
  • [25] Correlation analysis between ultrasonography and mammography with other risk factors related to breast cancer
    Zhang, Wenxiao
    Xu, Cui
    Li, Rui
    Cui, Guanghe
    Wang, Minmin
    Wang, Min
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 17 (06) : 5511 - 5516
  • [26] Comparison of Mammography in Combination with Breast Ultrasonography Versus Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening in Asymptomatic Women
    Boonlikit, Sarawan
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (12) : 7731 - 7736
  • [27] Screening mammography-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features based on breast cancer subtypes
    Kim, Mi Young
    Kim, Hyeon Sook
    Choi, Nami
    Yang, Jung-Hyun
    Yoo, Young Bum
    Park, Kyoung Sik
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (06) : 983 - 986
  • [28] The association of magnetic resonance imaging features with five molecular subtypes of breast cancer
    Nguyen, Van Thi
    Duong, Duc Huu
    Nguyen, Quang Thai
    Nguyen, Duy Thai
    Tran, Thi Linh
    Duong, Tra Giang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2024, 13
  • [29] Early forms of breast cancer according to the different molecular subtypes: imaging features
    Rouche, Julia Arfi
    Moalla, Salma
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2020, 30 (02) : 85 - 97
  • [30] Imaging features of breast cancer subtypes on contrast enhanced ultrasound: a feasibility study
    Chandola, Stuti
    Dhamija, Ekta
    Paul, Shashi B.
    Hari, Smriti
    Batra, Atul
    Mathur, Sandeep
    Deo, S. V. S.
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2023, 17