Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity

被引:5
|
作者
Iwata, Yo [1 ]
Fujimura, Fusako [2 ]
Handa, Tomoya [2 ]
Shoji, Nobuyuki [2 ,3 ]
Ishikawa, Hitoshi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Grad Sch, Doctors Program Med Sci, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
[2] Kitasato Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil Orthopt & Visual Sci Course, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
[3] Kitasato Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
关键词
STEREOSCOPIC ACUITY; STEREOPSIS; IMPROVEMENT; STEREOTEST; MONOVISION; SURGERY; FRISBY; TNO;
D O I
10.1155/2016/7950690
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Target size and test distance effects on stereoacuity were investigated in 24 subjects using a three-dimensional monitor. Examination 1: Target Size Effects. The test distance was 2.5 m for 0.1 degrees, 0.2 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 0.9 degrees target sizes; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values for 0.1 degrees, 0.2 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 0.9 degrees target sizes were 59.58 +/- 14.86, 47.66 +/- 13.71, 41.25 +/- 15.95, and 39.41 +/- 15.52 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity was significantly worse with a 0.1 degrees target than with 0.2 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 0.9 degrees target sizes (P = 0.03, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.0001, resp.). Examination 2: Test Distance Effects. Test distances of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 m were investigated for a 0.5 degrees target size; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values at 2.5 m, 5.0 m, and 7.5 m test distances were 44.91 +/- 16.16, 34.83 +/- 10.84, and 24.75 +/- 7.27 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity at a 7.5 m distance was significantly better than at distances of 2.5 m and 5.0 m (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.02, resp.). Stereoacuity at a 5.0 m distance was significantly better than at 2.5 m (P = 0.04). Stereoacuity should be estimated by both parallax and other elements, including test distance and target size.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children
    Adams, WE
    Hrisos, S
    Richardson, S
    Davis, H
    Frisby, JP
    Clarke, MP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (11) : 1438 - 1441
  • [42] A TEST OF INVARIANCE OF RATIO OF PERCEIVED SIZE TO PERCEIVED DISTANCE
    GOGEL, W
    HARKER, GS
    WIST, ER
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 76 (04): : 537 - &
  • [43] ILLUSORY DIFFERENCES WHICH ARE STEREOACUITY TEST CUES
    LARSON, WL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1985, 62 (06): : 413 - 417
  • [44] The effect of tints on distance stereoacuity under varying retinal illuminations
    Nsele, Nontobeko
    Patel, Zakariyya
    Mazibuko, Siboniso
    Moodley, Sivonia
    Paruk, Husna
    Rampersad, Nishanee
    Hansraj, Rekha
    AFRICAN VISION AND EYE HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 78 (01):
  • [45] EFFECTS OF RADIATION QUALITY, TARGET-AXIS DISTANCE, AND FIELD SIZE ON DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN ROTATION THERAPY
    QUIMBY, EH
    COHEN, BS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY RADIUM THERAPY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1957, 78 (05): : 819 - 830
  • [46] The influence of target size, distance and direction on the design of selection strategies
    Ren, XS
    Moriya, S
    PEOPLE AND COMPUTER XIII, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 67 - 82
  • [47] Interobserver test-retest reliability of the randot preschool stereoacuity test
    Fawcett, SL
    Birch, EE
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2000, 4 (06): : 354 - 358
  • [48] Evaluation of distance and near stereoacuity and fusional vergence in intermittent exotropia
    Pandey, Pramod Kumar
    Vats, Pankaj
    Amar, Ashish
    Lain, Pooja
    Bansal, Yuvika
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 57 (01) : 71 - 71
  • [49] Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target - context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion
    Knol, Hester
    Huys, Raoul
    Sarrazin, Jean-Christophe
    Jirsa, Viktor K.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [50] The Freiburg Stereoacuity Test: automatic measurement of stereo threshold
    Bach, M
    Schmitt, C
    Kromeier, M
    Kommerell, G
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 239 (08) : 562 - 566