Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity

被引:5
|
作者
Iwata, Yo [1 ]
Fujimura, Fusako [2 ]
Handa, Tomoya [2 ]
Shoji, Nobuyuki [2 ,3 ]
Ishikawa, Hitoshi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Grad Sch, Doctors Program Med Sci, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
[2] Kitasato Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil Orthopt & Visual Sci Course, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
[3] Kitasato Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
关键词
STEREOSCOPIC ACUITY; STEREOPSIS; IMPROVEMENT; STEREOTEST; MONOVISION; SURGERY; FRISBY; TNO;
D O I
10.1155/2016/7950690
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Target size and test distance effects on stereoacuity were investigated in 24 subjects using a three-dimensional monitor. Examination 1: Target Size Effects. The test distance was 2.5 m for 0.1 degrees, 0.2 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 0.9 degrees target sizes; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values for 0.1 degrees, 0.2 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 0.9 degrees target sizes were 59.58 +/- 14.86, 47.66 +/- 13.71, 41.25 +/- 15.95, and 39.41 +/- 15.52 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity was significantly worse with a 0.1 degrees target than with 0.2 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 0.9 degrees target sizes (P = 0.03, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.0001, resp.). Examination 2: Test Distance Effects. Test distances of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 m were investigated for a 0.5 degrees target size; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values at 2.5 m, 5.0 m, and 7.5 m test distances were 44.91 +/- 16.16, 34.83 +/- 10.84, and 24.75 +/- 7.27 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity at a 7.5 m distance was significantly better than at distances of 2.5 m and 5.0 m (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.02, resp.). Stereoacuity at a 5.0 m distance was significantly better than at 2.5 m (P = 0.04). Stereoacuity should be estimated by both parallax and other elements, including test distance and target size.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of stimulus blur and size on stereoacuity
    Wilcox, LM
    Elder, JH
    Hess, RF
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 3127 - 3127
  • [22] DISTANCE STEREOACUITY - ASSESSING CONTROL IN INTERMITTENT EXOTROPIA
    STATHACOPOULOS, RA
    ROSENBAUM, AL
    ZANONI, D
    STAGER, DR
    MCCALL, LC
    ZIFFER, AJ
    EVERETT, M
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 100 (04) : 495 - 500
  • [23] Does Distance Stereoacuity Deteriorate in Intermittent Exotropia?
    Leske, D. A.
    Hatt, S. R.
    Mohney, B. G.
    Brodsky, M. C.
    Yamada, T.
    Holmes, I. M.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [24] OPTIMISATION OF THE SIZE OF A TARGET AND THE THROWING DISTANCE DURING A THROW AT A TARGET FOR ADULTS
    Zahradnik, David
    Vaverka, Frantisek
    Gajda, Vojtech
    ACTA GYMNICA, 2008, 38 (04) : 39 - 45
  • [25] Randot Stereoacuity Test and Multiple Sclerosis
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 30 (01) : 103 - 103
  • [26] Test retest variability in stereoacuity measurements
    Mehta, Jignasa
    O'Connor, Anna
    STRABISMUS, 2023, 31 (03) : 188 - 196
  • [27] Crossed and uncrossed stereoacuity at distance and the effect from heterophoria
    Lam, AKC
    Tse, P
    Choy, E
    Chung, M
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2002, 22 (03) : 189 - 193
  • [28] The difference of distance stereoacuity measured with different separating methods
    Zhao, Lingzhi
    Zhang, Yu
    Wu, Huang
    Xiao, Jun
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (07)
  • [29] Distance stereoacuity in prism-induced convergence stress
    Firth, Alison Y.
    Davis, Helen
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2008, 12 (04): : 424 - 425
  • [30] LIGHT AND TARGET DISTANCE INTERACT TO CONTROL PUPIL SIZE
    MYERS, GA
    BAREZ, S
    KRENZ, WC
    STARK, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 258 (03): : R813 - R819