Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?

被引:11
|
作者
Xie, Sidong [1 ]
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Chen, Jingbiao [1 ]
Jiang, Ting [1 ]
Liu, Weimin [1 ]
Rong, Dailin [1 ]
Sun, Lin [1 ]
Zhang, Linqi [1 ]
He, Bingjun [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ SYSU, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Liver neoplasms; Diagnosis; Sensitivity and specificity; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadoxetic acid; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; HEPATOBILIARY PHASE; HYPOVASCULAR NODULES; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; FEATURES; HYPOINTENSITY; PERFORMANCE; RISK; FAT;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-021-03339-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 LR-5 criteria can be modified to increase sensitivity without reducing specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods A total of 133 high-risk consecutive patients with 174 small observations (10-19 mm) detected on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively studied. LI-RADS MRI major features (MFs) and ancillary features (AFs) were reviewed by two independent radiologists in consensus. Observations were categorized using LI-RADS v2018 MFs. Independently significant AFs were identified through logistic regression analysis. Upgraded LR-5 criteria were developed by combining independently significant AFs with MFs of LR-3 or LR-4 v2018. The sensitivity and specificity of the new diagnostic criteria were compared with those of LR-5 v2018 using McNemar's test. Results Three of the AFs favoring malignancy [mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, transitional phase (TP) hypointensity and fat in mass] were independently significant features for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC. The upgraded LR-5 criteria (mLI-RADS VII: LR-4 + mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity/TP hypointensity or LR-3 + fat in mass) yielded a significantly greater sensitivity than that of the LR-5 v2018 criteria (70.4% vs 55.1%; p < 0.001), whereas the specificity was not significantly different (94.7% vs 98.7%, p = 0.250). Conclusions Independently significant AFs may be used to upgrade an observation from LR-3/LR-4 to LR-5, which can improve the sensitivity without impairing the specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. [GRAPHICS]
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 607
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10–19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Sidong Xie
    Yao Zhang
    Jingbiao Chen
    Ting Jiang
    Weimin Liu
    Dailin Rong
    Lin Sun
    Linqi Zhang
    Bingjun He
    Jin Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 596 - 607
  • [2] Simplified LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI
    Kwag, Minha
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Choi, Se Jin
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 305 (03) : 614 - 622
  • [3] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Oh, Na Eun
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Sehee
    Lee, Habeen
    Jang, Hyeon Ji
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 465 - 474
  • [4] Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Kuang, Sichi
    Zhang, Yao
    Tang, Wenjie
    Xie, Sidong
    Zhang, Linqi
    Rong, Dailin
    He, Bingjun
    Deng, Ying
    Xiao, Yuanqiang
    Shi, Wenqi
    Fowler, Kathryn
    Wang, Jin
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (04) : 1530 - 1542
  • [5] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Na Eun Oh
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Sehee Kim
    Habeen Lee
    Hyeon Ji Jang
    Jae Ho Byun
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 465 - 474
  • [6] Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10–19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI
    Jingbiao Chen
    Sichi Kuang
    Yao Zhang
    Wenjie Tang
    Sidong Xie
    Linqi Zhang
    Dailin Rong
    Bingjun He
    Ying Deng
    Yuanqiang Xiao
    Wenqi Shi
    Kathryn Fowler
    Jin Wang
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 1530 - 1542
  • [7] Comparison of modified CEUS LI-RADS with sonazoid and CT/MRI LI-RADS for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Saito, Kazuhiro
    Shirota, Natsuhiko
    Kamiyama, Naohisa
    Sakamaki, Kentaro
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Wada, Takuya
    Kakegawa, Tatsuya
    Tomita, Yusuke
    Abe, Masakazu
    Yoshimasu, Yu
    Takeuchi, Hirohito
    Itoi, Takao
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 52 (08) : 730 - 738
  • [8] LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to improve the diagnostic performance of small hapatocellular carcinoma (=20 mm)
    Lyu, Rong
    Hu, Weijuan
    Wang, Di
    Wang, Jiao
    Gao, Zhongsong
    Jia, Kefeng
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (06) : 1987 - 1994
  • [9] LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to improve the diagnostic performance of small hapatocellular carcinoma (≤ 20 mm)
    Rong Lyu
    Weijuan Hu
    Di Wang
    Jiao Wang
    Zhongsong Gao
    Kefeng Jia
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 1987 - 1994
  • [10] Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with a focus on LI-RADS v2018 imaging features predicts the prognosis after radiofrequency ablation in small hepatocellular carcinoma
    Wang, Ruizhi
    Xu, Hengtian
    Chen, Wufei
    Jin, Liang
    Ma, Zhuangxuan
    Wen, Lei
    Wang, Hongwei
    Cao, Kun
    Du, Xia
    Li, Ming
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13