Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?

被引:11
|
作者
Xie, Sidong [1 ]
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Chen, Jingbiao [1 ]
Jiang, Ting [1 ]
Liu, Weimin [1 ]
Rong, Dailin [1 ]
Sun, Lin [1 ]
Zhang, Linqi [1 ]
He, Bingjun [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ SYSU, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Liver neoplasms; Diagnosis; Sensitivity and specificity; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadoxetic acid; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; HEPATOBILIARY PHASE; HYPOVASCULAR NODULES; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; FEATURES; HYPOINTENSITY; PERFORMANCE; RISK; FAT;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-021-03339-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 LR-5 criteria can be modified to increase sensitivity without reducing specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods A total of 133 high-risk consecutive patients with 174 small observations (10-19 mm) detected on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively studied. LI-RADS MRI major features (MFs) and ancillary features (AFs) were reviewed by two independent radiologists in consensus. Observations were categorized using LI-RADS v2018 MFs. Independently significant AFs were identified through logistic regression analysis. Upgraded LR-5 criteria were developed by combining independently significant AFs with MFs of LR-3 or LR-4 v2018. The sensitivity and specificity of the new diagnostic criteria were compared with those of LR-5 v2018 using McNemar's test. Results Three of the AFs favoring malignancy [mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, transitional phase (TP) hypointensity and fat in mass] were independently significant features for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC. The upgraded LR-5 criteria (mLI-RADS VII: LR-4 + mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity/TP hypointensity or LR-3 + fat in mass) yielded a significantly greater sensitivity than that of the LR-5 v2018 criteria (70.4% vs 55.1%; p < 0.001), whereas the specificity was not significantly different (94.7% vs 98.7%, p = 0.250). Conclusions Independently significant AFs may be used to upgrade an observation from LR-3/LR-4 to LR-5, which can improve the sensitivity without impairing the specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. [GRAPHICS]
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 607
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LI-RADS Classification and Prognosis of Primary Liver Cancers at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Park, So Hyun
    Kim, Kang Mo
    Yu, Eunsil
    Park, Yangsoon
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Lee, Moon-Gyu
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (02) : 388 - 397
  • [22] Preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI predicts aggressive pathological features in LI-RADS category 5 hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang, X.
    Shi, S.
    Gao, T.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 77 (09) : 708 - 716
  • [23] A multivariate model based on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using Li-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liu, Mao-Tong
    Zhang, Ji-Yun
    Xu, Lei
    Qu, Qi
    Lu, Meng-Tian
    Jiang, Ji-Feng
    Zhao, Xian-Ce
    Zhang, Xue-Qin
    Zhang, Tao
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2023, 128 (11): : 1333 - 1346
  • [24] A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based multivariable model using LI-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang, Yingying
    Xu, Fan
    Wang, Zihua
    Tan, Caihong
    Zhang, Nianru
    Wei, Xinhua
    Jiang, Xinqing
    Wu, Hongzhen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 153
  • [25] Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Hu, Yi-Xin
    Shen, Jing-Xian
    Han, Jing
    Mao, Si-Yue
    Mao, Ru-Shuang
    Li, Qing
    Li, Fei
    Guo, Zhi-Xing
    Zhou, Jian-Hua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [26] LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Ji Soo Song
    Eun Jung Choi
    Seung Bae Hwang
    Hong Pil Hwang
    HyeMi Choi
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 401 - 410
  • [27] LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Song, Ji Soo
    Choi, Eun Jung
    Hwang, Seung Bae
    Hwang, Hong Pil
    Choi, HyeMi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 401 - 410
  • [28] Modified CEUS LI-RADS using Sonazoid for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Kamiyama, Naohisa
    Kakegawa, Tatsuya
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Wada, Takuya
    Abe, Masakazu
    Yoshimasu, Yu
    Takeuchi, Hirohito
    Itoi, Takao
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2023, 42 (03) : 388 - 399
  • [29] Prognosis after Curative Resection of Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma with A Focus on LI-RADS Targetoid Appearance on Preoperative Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI
    Moon, Ji Yoon
    Min, Ji Hye
    Kim, Young Kon
    Cha, Donglk
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Ko, Seong Eun
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Yun, Eun Joo
    Kim, Seon Woo
    Won, Ho-Jeong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (11) : 1786 - 1796
  • [30] Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging
    Sun Kyung Jeon
    Ijin Joo
    Dong Ho Lee
    Sang Min Lee
    Hyo-Jin Kang
    Kyoung-Bun Lee
    Jeong Min Lee
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 373 - 382