Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?

被引:11
|
作者
Xie, Sidong [1 ]
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Chen, Jingbiao [1 ]
Jiang, Ting [1 ]
Liu, Weimin [1 ]
Rong, Dailin [1 ]
Sun, Lin [1 ]
Zhang, Linqi [1 ]
He, Bingjun [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ SYSU, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Liver neoplasms; Diagnosis; Sensitivity and specificity; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadoxetic acid; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; HEPATOBILIARY PHASE; HYPOVASCULAR NODULES; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; FEATURES; HYPOINTENSITY; PERFORMANCE; RISK; FAT;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-021-03339-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 LR-5 criteria can be modified to increase sensitivity without reducing specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods A total of 133 high-risk consecutive patients with 174 small observations (10-19 mm) detected on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively studied. LI-RADS MRI major features (MFs) and ancillary features (AFs) were reviewed by two independent radiologists in consensus. Observations were categorized using LI-RADS v2018 MFs. Independently significant AFs were identified through logistic regression analysis. Upgraded LR-5 criteria were developed by combining independently significant AFs with MFs of LR-3 or LR-4 v2018. The sensitivity and specificity of the new diagnostic criteria were compared with those of LR-5 v2018 using McNemar's test. Results Three of the AFs favoring malignancy [mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, transitional phase (TP) hypointensity and fat in mass] were independently significant features for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC. The upgraded LR-5 criteria (mLI-RADS VII: LR-4 + mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity/TP hypointensity or LR-3 + fat in mass) yielded a significantly greater sensitivity than that of the LR-5 v2018 criteria (70.4% vs 55.1%; p < 0.001), whereas the specificity was not significantly different (94.7% vs 98.7%, p = 0.250). Conclusions Independently significant AFs may be used to upgrade an observation from LR-3/LR-4 to LR-5, which can improve the sensitivity without impairing the specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. [GRAPHICS]
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 607
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Added Value of a Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatocyte-phase Image to the LI-RADS System for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chen, Ningxin
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Fujii, Hideki
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 15 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [32] Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Lee, Sang Min
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Lee, Kyoung-Bun
    Lee, Jeong Min
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 373 - 382
  • [33] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Sei Nakao
    Masahiro Tanabe
    Munemasa Okada
    Matakazu Furukawa
    Etsushi Iida
    Keisuke Miyoshi
    Naofumi Matsunaga
    Katsuyoshi Ito
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2019, 37 : 651 - 659
  • [34] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Nakao, Sei
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Okada, Munemasa
    Furukawa, Matakazu
    Iida, Etsushi
    Miyoshi, Keisuke
    Matsunaga, Naofumi
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (09) : 651 - 659
  • [35] LI-RADS M (LR-M) criteria and reporting algorithm of v2018: diagnostic values in the assessment of primary liver cancers on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Kim, Min Young
    Joo, Ijin
    Kang, Hyo Jin
    Seok, Jae
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Lee, Jeong Min
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (08) : 2440 - 2448
  • [36] Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors
    Tyler J. Fraum
    Roberto Cannella
    Daniel R. Ludwig
    Richard Tsai
    Muhammad Naeem
    Maverick LeBlanc
    Amber Salter
    Allan Tsung
    Anup S. Shetty
    Amir A. Borhani
    Alessandro Furlan
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 996 - 1007
  • [37] Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017
    Ren, A-Hong
    Zhao, Peng-Fei
    Yang, Da-Wei
    Du, Jing-Bo
    Wang, Zhen-Chang
    Yang, Zheng-Han
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (03) : 746 - 755
  • [38] LI-RADS M (LR-M) criteria and reporting algorithm of v2018: diagnostic values in the assessment of primary liver cancers on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Min Young Kim
    Ijin Joo
    Hyo Jin Kang
    Jae Seok Bae
    Sun Kyung Jeon
    Jeong Min Lee
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 2440 - 2448
  • [39] Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging
    Yao, Shan
    Wei, Yi
    Ye, Zheng
    Chen, Jie
    Duan, Ting
    Zhang, Zhen
    Song, Bin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 59 (06) : 2060 - 2070
  • [40] Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Cannella, Roberto
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Tsai, Richard
    Naeem, Muhammad
    LeBlanc, Maverick
    Salter, Amber
    Tsung, Allan
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (02) : 996 - 1007