Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates

被引:1
|
作者
Oh, Na Eun [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Sang Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sehee [3 ]
Lee, Habeen [4 ]
Jang, Hyeon Ji [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Jae Ho [1 ,2 ]
Won, Hyung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Moon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Res Inst Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Liver; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Transplantation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; MILAN CRITERIA; CT; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10014-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, comparing liver transplant candidates (LT group) with patients who underwent surgical resection (SR group), and to determine significant clinical factors for diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018.MethodsPatients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and subsequent SR or LT for HCC were retrospectively included between January 2019 and December 2020. The sensitivity and specificity of LI-RADS LR-5 for HCC were compared between the two groups using generalized estimating equations. The accuracy of patient allocation according to the Milan criteria was calculated for the LT group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant clinical factors associated with the sensitivity of LI-RADS.ResultsOf the 281 patients, 237 were assigned to the SR group, and 44 were assigned to the LT group. The LT group showed significantly lower per-patient (48.5% vs. 79.6%, p < .001) and per-lesion sensitivity (31.0% vs. 75.9%, p < .001) than the SR group, whereas no significant difference in both per-patient (100.0% vs. 91.7%, p > .99) and per-lesion specificities (100.0% vs. 94.1%, p > .99). The accuracy of patient allocation was 50.0%. Sensitivity was significantly lower in patients with a smaller lesion size (p < .001), a larger lesion number (p = .002), and a higher Child-Pugh score (p = .009).ConclusionLI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI might be insufficient in liver transplant candidates and other diagnostic imaging tests should be considered in patients with these significant clinical factors.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Na Eun Oh
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Sehee Kim
    Habeen Lee
    Hyeon Ji Jang
    Jae Ho Byun
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 465 - 474
  • [2] Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10–19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Sidong Xie
    Yao Zhang
    Jingbiao Chen
    Ting Jiang
    Weimin Liu
    Dailin Rong
    Lin Sun
    Linqi Zhang
    Bingjun He
    Jin Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 596 - 607
  • [3] Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Xie, Sidong
    Zhang, Yao
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Jiang, Ting
    Liu, Weimin
    Rong, Dailin
    Sun, Lin
    Zhang, Linqi
    He, Bingjun
    Wang, Jin
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (02) : 596 - 607
  • [4] Simplified LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI
    Kwag, Minha
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Choi, Se Jin
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 305 (03) : 614 - 622
  • [5] Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with a focus on LI-RADS v2018 imaging features predicts the prognosis after radiofrequency ablation in small hepatocellular carcinoma
    Wang, Ruizhi
    Xu, Hengtian
    Chen, Wufei
    Jin, Liang
    Ma, Zhuangxuan
    Wen, Lei
    Wang, Hongwei
    Cao, Kun
    Du, Xia
    Li, Ming
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [6] LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to improve the diagnostic performance of small hapatocellular carcinoma (=20 mm)
    Lyu, Rong
    Hu, Weijuan
    Wang, Di
    Wang, Jiao
    Gao, Zhongsong
    Jia, Kefeng
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (06) : 1987 - 1994
  • [7] LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to improve the diagnostic performance of small hapatocellular carcinoma (≤ 20 mm)
    Rong Lyu
    Weijuan Hu
    Di Wang
    Jiao Wang
    Zhongsong Gao
    Kefeng Jia
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 1987 - 1994
  • [8] A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based model using LI-RADS v2018 features for preoperatively predicting Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yingying Liang
    Fan Xu
    Qiuju Mou
    Zihua Wang
    Chuyin Xiao
    Tingwen Zhou
    Nianru Zhang
    Jing Yang
    Hongzhen Wu
    BMC Medical Imaging, 24
  • [9] A multivariate model based on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using Li-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of dual‑phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma
    Mao-Tong Liu
    Ji-Yun Zhang
    Lei Xu
    Qi Qu
    Meng-Tian LU
    Ji-Feng Jiang
    Xian-Ce Zhao
    Xue-Qin Zhang
    Tao Zhang
    La radiologia medica, 2023, 128 : 1333 - 1346
  • [10] A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based model using LI-RADS v2018 features for preoperatively predicting Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang, Yingying
    Xu, Fan
    Mou, Qiuju
    Wang, Zihua
    Xiao, Chuyin
    Zhou, Tingwen
    Zhang, Nianru
    Yang, Jing
    Wu, Hongzhen
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)