Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates

被引:1
|
作者
Oh, Na Eun [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Sang Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sehee [3 ]
Lee, Habeen [4 ]
Jang, Hyeon Ji [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Jae Ho [1 ,2 ]
Won, Hyung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Moon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Res Inst Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Liver; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Transplantation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; MILAN CRITERIA; CT; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10014-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, comparing liver transplant candidates (LT group) with patients who underwent surgical resection (SR group), and to determine significant clinical factors for diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018.MethodsPatients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and subsequent SR or LT for HCC were retrospectively included between January 2019 and December 2020. The sensitivity and specificity of LI-RADS LR-5 for HCC were compared between the two groups using generalized estimating equations. The accuracy of patient allocation according to the Milan criteria was calculated for the LT group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant clinical factors associated with the sensitivity of LI-RADS.ResultsOf the 281 patients, 237 were assigned to the SR group, and 44 were assigned to the LT group. The LT group showed significantly lower per-patient (48.5% vs. 79.6%, p < .001) and per-lesion sensitivity (31.0% vs. 75.9%, p < .001) than the SR group, whereas no significant difference in both per-patient (100.0% vs. 91.7%, p > .99) and per-lesion specificities (100.0% vs. 94.1%, p > .99). The accuracy of patient allocation was 50.0%. Sensitivity was significantly lower in patients with a smaller lesion size (p < .001), a larger lesion number (p = .002), and a higher Child-Pugh score (p = .009).ConclusionLI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI might be insufficient in liver transplant candidates and other diagnostic imaging tests should be considered in patients with these significant clinical factors.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Song, Ji Soo
    Choi, Eun Jung
    Hwang, Seung Bae
    Hwang, Hong Pil
    Choi, HyeMi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 401 - 410
  • [22] Can LI-RADS imaging features at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI predict aggressive features on pathology of single hepatocellular carcinoma?
    Wei, Hong
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Liu, Xijiao
    Qin, Yun
    Zheng, Tianying
    Liu, Siyun
    Zhang, Xin
    Song, Bin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 132
  • [23] Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017
    Ren, A-Hong
    Zhao, Peng-Fei
    Yang, Da-Wei
    Du, Jing-Bo
    Wang, Zhen-Chang
    Yang, Zheng-Han
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (03) : 746 - 755
  • [24] LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI to modify final LI-RADS category
    Boatright, Christine
    Peterson, Jessica
    Williams, Vanessa L.
    Best, Shaun
    Ash, Ryan
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (10) : 3136 - 3143
  • [25] LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI to modify final LI-RADS category
    Christine Boatright
    Jessica Peterson
    Vanessa L. Williams
    Shaun Best
    Ryan Ash
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 3136 - 3143
  • [26] Prognosis after Curative Resection of Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma with A Focus on LI-RADS Targetoid Appearance on Preoperative Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI
    Moon, Ji Yoon
    Min, Ji Hye
    Kim, Young Kon
    Cha, Donglk
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Ko, Seong Eun
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Yun, Eun Joo
    Kim, Seon Woo
    Won, Ho-Jeong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (11) : 1786 - 1796
  • [27] Diagnostic Performance of 2018 KLCA-NCC Practice Guideline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or Cirrhosis: Comparison with LI-RADS Version 2018
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Yang, Hyun Kyung
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (07) : 1066 - 1076
  • [28] Optimal lexicon of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma modified from LI-RADS
    Hwang, Shin Hye
    Park, Sumi
    Han, Kyunghwa
    Choi, Jin-young
    Park, Young-Nyun
    Park, Mi-Suk
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (09) : 3078 - 3088
  • [29] LI-RADS category 5 hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for early recurrence risk stratification after curative resection
    Wei, Hong
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Zheng, Tianying
    Zhang, Zhen
    Yang, Caiwei
    Ye, Zheng
    Duan, Ting
    Song, Bin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (04) : 2289 - 2302
  • [30] Optimal lexicon of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma modified from LI-RADS
    Shin Hye Hwang
    Sumi Park
    Kyunghwa Han
    Jin-young Choi
    Young-Nyun Park
    Mi-Suk Park
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 3078 - 3088