Clinical Validation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Standards of Fetal Abdominal Circumference for the Prediction of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates in Italy

被引:6
|
作者
Bellussi, Federica [1 ]
Cataneo, Ilaria [1 ]
Visentin, Silvia [2 ]
Simonazzi, Giuliana [1 ]
Lenzi, Jacopo [3 ]
Fantini, Maria Pia [3 ]
Mimmi, Stefano [4 ]
Cosmi, Erich [2 ]
Pilu, Gianluigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Dept Womans & Childs Hlth, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Modena, Local Hlth Author, Modena, Italy
关键词
Abdominal circumference; Small for gestational age; INTERGROWTH-21st; Fetal growth restriction; BIRTH-WEIGHT STANDARDS; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; POPULATION; GROWTH; CURVES; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1159/000457121
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy of the INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) with the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIEOG) abdominal circumference (AC) standards in the detection of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses in a high-risk population. Material and Methods: Our study included all pregnant patients with an increased risk of placental insufficiency that were seen in two Italian university hospitals between 2014 and 2015. The accuracy of IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards in the detection of SGA neo-nates was analyzed by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) at 4 gestational age intervals (24-27, 28-31, 32-35, > 35 weeks). Results: We enrolled 428 patients (278 Italians). There was no significant difference between the ROC-AUC of AC according to IG-21 and SIEOG standards for all birthweight thresholds and gestational intervals that were considered. The diagnostic per-formance was similar in Italian and non-Italian patients. The accuracy was, however, limited, with values of ROC-AUC ranging between 0.80 and 0.89. Conclusions: The IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards are interchangeable for the diagnosis of SGA fetuses. The diagnostic accuracy is, however, limited. We provide figures that can be used to stratify the probability that an infant will be SGA in an obstetric population at increased risk of growth restriction. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INTERGROWTH-21 versus GROW: effectiveness for predicting small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and stillbirths
    Holdsworth, R.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 59 - 59
  • [42] Social gradient of birthweight in England assessed using the INTERGROWTH-21st gestational age-specific standard
    Hirst, Jane E.
    Knight, Hannah Ellin
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Dwyer, Terence
    Hennig, Benjamin D.
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Villar, Jose
    Kennedy, Stephen H.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2019, 104 (05): : F486 - F492
  • [43] SGA related stillbirth risk according to INTERGROWTH-21st vs. GROW fetal weight standards
    Hugh, Oliver
    Gardosi, Jason
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 34 - 35
  • [44] Gestational weight gain standards based on women enrolled in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: a prospective longitudinal cohort study
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Bishop, Deborah C.
    Pang, Ruyan
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Kac, Gilberto
    Abrams, Barbara
    Rasmussen, Kathleen
    Barros, Fernando C.
    Hirst, Jane E.
    Lambert, Ann
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Stones, William
    Jaffer, Yasmin A.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Noble, J. Alison
    Giolito, Maria Rosa
    Gravett, Michael G.
    Purwar, Manorama
    Kennedy, Stephen H.
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Villar, Jose
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
  • [45] New birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age in Southern China and its comparison with the INTERGROWTH-21st Standard
    Yao, Fei
    Miao, Huazhang
    Li, Bing
    Wu, Yuntao
    Zhao, Qingguo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [46] Predictors of inadequate gestational weight gain according to iom recommendations and intergrowth-21st standards: the araraquara cohort study
    Victor, Audencio
    Teles, Laisla de Franca da Silva
    de Carvalho, Leticia Falcao
    Biagio, Leonardo Domingos
    Argentato, Perla Pizzi
    Luzia, Liania A.
    Rondo, Patricia H. C.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [47] International standards of fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurement : Longitudinal Study of Fetal Growth project INTERGROWTH-21st
    Fustinana, Carlos
    ARCHIVOS ARGENTINOS DE PEDIATRIA, 2015, 113 (01): : 90 - 91
  • [48] A comparative analysis of INTERGROWTH-21st<SUP/> and the World Health Organisation fetal growth chart in detection of term small for gestational age newborns and prediction of short-term adverse perinatal outcomes
    Rahim, Anum
    Nuruddin, Rozina
    Azam, Iqbal
    Rahim, Komal Abdul
    Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder
    Mohammed, Nuruddin
    BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2025, 9 (01)
  • [49] Diagnostic test characteristics of placental weight in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Ness, Roberta B.
    Bass, Debra
    Hill, Lyndon
    Klebanoff, Mark A.
    Zhang, Jun
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 52 (09) : 793 - 800
  • [50] New birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age in Southern China and its comparison with the INTERGROWTH-21st Standard
    Fei Yao
    Huazhang Miao
    Bing Li
    Yuntao Wu
    Qingguo Zhao
    Scientific Reports, 8