Clinical Validation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Standards of Fetal Abdominal Circumference for the Prediction of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates in Italy

被引:6
|
作者
Bellussi, Federica [1 ]
Cataneo, Ilaria [1 ]
Visentin, Silvia [2 ]
Simonazzi, Giuliana [1 ]
Lenzi, Jacopo [3 ]
Fantini, Maria Pia [3 ]
Mimmi, Stefano [4 ]
Cosmi, Erich [2 ]
Pilu, Gianluigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Dept Womans & Childs Hlth, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Modena, Local Hlth Author, Modena, Italy
关键词
Abdominal circumference; Small for gestational age; INTERGROWTH-21st; Fetal growth restriction; BIRTH-WEIGHT STANDARDS; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; POPULATION; GROWTH; CURVES; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1159/000457121
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy of the INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) with the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIEOG) abdominal circumference (AC) standards in the detection of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses in a high-risk population. Material and Methods: Our study included all pregnant patients with an increased risk of placental insufficiency that were seen in two Italian university hospitals between 2014 and 2015. The accuracy of IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards in the detection of SGA neo-nates was analyzed by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) at 4 gestational age intervals (24-27, 28-31, 32-35, > 35 weeks). Results: We enrolled 428 patients (278 Italians). There was no significant difference between the ROC-AUC of AC according to IG-21 and SIEOG standards for all birthweight thresholds and gestational intervals that were considered. The diagnostic per-formance was similar in Italian and non-Italian patients. The accuracy was, however, limited, with values of ROC-AUC ranging between 0.80 and 0.89. Conclusions: The IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards are interchangeable for the diagnosis of SGA fetuses. The diagnostic accuracy is, however, limited. We provide figures that can be used to stratify the probability that an infant will be SGA in an obstetric population at increased risk of growth restriction. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Statistical considerations for the development of prescriptive fetal and newborn growth standards in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project
    Altman, D. G.
    Ohuma, E. O.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 71 - 76
  • [22] The INTERGROWTH-21st fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Kennedy, Stephen H.
    Salomon, Laurent J.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Stones, William
    Gravett, Michael G.
    Barros, Fernando C.
    Victora, Cesar
    Purwar, Manorama
    Jaffer, Yasmin
    Noble, Julia A.
    Bertino, Enrico
    Pang, Ruyan
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Lambert, Ann
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Villar, Jose
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (02) : S630 - S640
  • [23] INTERGROWTH-21st v. local South African growth standards (Theron-Thompson) for identification of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in stillbirths: A closer look at variation across pregnancy
    Lavin, T.
    Nedkoff, L.
    Preen, D.
    Theron, G.
    Pattinson, R. C.
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 109 (07): : 519 - 525
  • [24] Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30-34 weeks
    Bakalis, S.
    Silva, M.
    Akolekar, R.
    Poon, L. C.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 551 - 558
  • [25] Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 19-24 weeks
    Lesmes, C.
    Gallo, D. M.
    Panaiotova, J.
    Poon, L. C.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (02) : 198 - 207
  • [26] Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks
    Fadigas, C.
    Saiid, Y.
    Gonzalez, R.
    Poon, L. C.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 559 - 565
  • [27] Estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st project for the prediction of adverse outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Rebelo, Fernanda
    Carrilho, Thais R. B.
    Canuto, Raquel
    Schlussel, Michael M.
    Farias, Dayana R.
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Kac, Gilberto
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2023, 36 (02):
  • [28] Fetal abdominal circumference growth velocity and cerebroplacental ratio as predictors of perinatal outcome in small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Cavallaro, A.
    Veglia, M.
    Svirko, E.
    Black, R.
    Impey, L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 32 - 32
  • [29] Anthropometric protocols for the construction of new international fetal and newborn growth standards: the INTERGROWTH-21st Project
    Ismail, L. Cheikh
    Knight, H. E.
    Bhutta, Z.
    Chumlea, W. C.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 42 - 47
  • [30] Stillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index
    Gardosi, Jason
    Hugh, Oliver
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 229 (05) : 547.e1 - 547.e13