Clinical Validation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Standards of Fetal Abdominal Circumference for the Prediction of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates in Italy

被引:6
|
作者
Bellussi, Federica [1 ]
Cataneo, Ilaria [1 ]
Visentin, Silvia [2 ]
Simonazzi, Giuliana [1 ]
Lenzi, Jacopo [3 ]
Fantini, Maria Pia [3 ]
Mimmi, Stefano [4 ]
Cosmi, Erich [2 ]
Pilu, Gianluigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Dept Womans & Childs Hlth, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Modena, Local Hlth Author, Modena, Italy
关键词
Abdominal circumference; Small for gestational age; INTERGROWTH-21st; Fetal growth restriction; BIRTH-WEIGHT STANDARDS; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; POPULATION; GROWTH; CURVES; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1159/000457121
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy of the INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) with the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIEOG) abdominal circumference (AC) standards in the detection of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses in a high-risk population. Material and Methods: Our study included all pregnant patients with an increased risk of placental insufficiency that were seen in two Italian university hospitals between 2014 and 2015. The accuracy of IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards in the detection of SGA neo-nates was analyzed by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) at 4 gestational age intervals (24-27, 28-31, 32-35, > 35 weeks). Results: We enrolled 428 patients (278 Italians). There was no significant difference between the ROC-AUC of AC according to IG-21 and SIEOG standards for all birthweight thresholds and gestational intervals that were considered. The diagnostic per-formance was similar in Italian and non-Italian patients. The accuracy was, however, limited, with values of ROC-AUC ranging between 0.80 and 0.89. Conclusions: The IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards are interchangeable for the diagnosis of SGA fetuses. The diagnostic accuracy is, however, limited. We provide figures that can be used to stratify the probability that an infant will be SGA in an obstetric population at increased risk of growth restriction. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Customized versus Intergrowth-21st standard for identifying risk of neonatal large for gestational age and complications
    Hoover, Elizabeth A.
    Odibo, Linda
    Duncan, Jose R.
    Odibo, Anthony
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S711 - S711
  • [32] Excessive gestational weight gain and the risk of gestational diabetes: Comparison of Intergrowth-21st standards, IOM recommendations and a local reference
    Jin, Chuyao
    Lin, Lizi
    Han, Na
    Zhao, Zhiling
    Liu, Zheng
    Luo, Shusheng
    Xu, Xiangrong
    Liu, Jue
    Wang, Haijun
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 158
  • [33] Newborn birth weight, length, and head circumference for gestational age in Guangzhou based on the INTERGROWTH-21st standard: a multiyear hospital liveborn cohort study
    Liu, Shiliang
    Gong, Jingjin
    Pan, Yanmei
    Xie, Susan
    Chen, Dunjin
    LANCET, 2015, 386 : 48 - 48
  • [34] A Comparison of Prediction of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes between Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st Standards at the Third Trimester
    Zhu, Chen
    Ren, Yun-Yun
    Wu, Jiang-Nan
    Zhou, Qiong-Jie
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [35] External validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for midgestation prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates in Spanish population
    Albaiges, G.
    Papastefanou, I.
    Rodriguez, I.
    Prats, P.
    Echevarria, M.
    Rodriguez, M. A.
    Melcon, A. Rodriguez
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 (02) : 202 - 208
  • [36] The satisfactory growth and development at 2 years of age of the INTERGROWTH-21st Fetal Growth Standards cohort support its appropriateness for constructing international standards
    Villar, Jose
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Urias, Eleonora Staines
    Giuliani, Francesca
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Victora, Cesar G.
    Papageorghiou, Ails T.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Garza, Cutberto
    Barros, Fernando C.
    Puglia, Fabien
    Ochieng, Roseline
    Jaffer, Yasmin A.
    Noble, Julia A.
    Bertino, Enrico
    Purwar, Manorama
    Pang, Ruyan
    Lambert, Ann
    Chumlea, Cameron
    Stein, Alan
    Fernandes, Michelle
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Kennedy, Stephen H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (02) : S841 - +
  • [37] Comparison of the INTERGROWTH-21st, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and WHO fetal growth standards
    Hua, Xiaolin
    Shen, Minxue
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Louis, Germaine Buck
    Souza, Joao Paulo
    Guelmezoglu, A. Metin
    Zhang, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 (02) : 156 - 163
  • [38] SGA related stillbirth risk according to INTERGROWTH-21st vs. GROW fetal weight standards
    Hugh, Oliver
    Gardosi, Jason
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 34 - 35
  • [39] Assessing fetal growth in Africa: Application of the international WHO and INTERGROWTH-21st standards in a Beninese pregnancy cohort
    Yovo, Emmanuel
    Accrombessi, Manfred
    Agbota, Gino
    Hocquette, Alice
    Atade, William
    Ladikpo, Olaiitan T.
    Mehoba, Murielle
    Degbe, Auguste
    Mombo-Ngoma, Ghyslain
    Massougbodji, Achille
    Jackson, Nikki
    Fievet, Nadine
    Heude, Barbara
    Zeitlin, Jennifer
    Briand, Valerie
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [40] International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Todros, Tullia
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Lambert, Ann
    Jaffer, Yasmin A.
    Bertino, Enrico
    Gravett, Michael G.
    Purwar, Manorama
    Noble, J. Alison
    Pang, Ruyan
    Victora, Cesar G.
    Barros, Fernando C.
    Carvalho, Maria
    Salomon, Laurent J.
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Kennedy, Stephen H.
    Villar, Jose
    LANCET, 2014, 384 (9946): : 869 - 879