CLINICAL TOXICITIES AND DOSIMETRIC PARAMETERS AFTER WHOLE-PELVIS VERSUS PROSTATE-ONLY INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER

被引:31
|
作者
Deville, Curtiland [1 ]
Both, Stefan [1 ]
Hwang, Wei-Ting [2 ]
Tochner, Zelig [1 ]
Vapiwala, Neha [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Pelvic nodal irradiation; Whole pelvis; IMRT; Toxicity; Prostate cancer; PHASE-III TRIAL; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; DOSE-VOLUME CONSTRAINTS; LATE RECTAL TOXICITY; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; ONCOLOGY GROUP-9413; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; NEOADJUVANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.043
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess whether whole-pelvis (WP) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is associated with increased toxicity compared with prostate-only (PO) IMRT. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with prostate cancer undergoing definitive IMRT to 79.2 Gy with concurrent androgen deprivation at our institution from November 2005 to May 2007 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Thirty patients received initial WP IMRT to 45 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions, and thirty patients received PO IMRT. Study patients underwent computed tomography simulation and treatment planning by use of predefined dose constraints. Bladder and rectal dose volume histograms, maximum genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity grade, and late Grade 2 or greater toxicity-free survival curves were compared between the two groups by use of the Student t test, Fisher exact test, and Kaplan-Meier curve, respectively. Results: Bladder minimum dose, mean dose, median dose, volume receiving 5 Gy, volume receiving 20 Gy, volume receiving 40 Gy, and volume receiving 45 Gy and rectal minimum dose, median dose, and volume receiving 20 Gy were significantly increased in the WP group (all p values < 0.01). Maximum acute GI toxicity was limited to Grade 2 and was significantly increased in the WP group at 50% vs. 13% the PO group (p = 0.006). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 12-35 months), there was no difference in late GI toxicity (p = 0.884) or in acute or late GU toxicity. Conclusions: Despite dosimetric differences in the volume of bowel, bladder, and rectum irradiated in the low-dose and median-dose regions, WP IMRT results only in a clinically significant increase in acute GI toxicity, in comparison to PO IMRT, with no difference in GU or late GI toxicity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 772
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bowel and urinary quality of life after whole-pelvic versus prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Ishii, Kentaro
    Yamanaga, Toshiko
    Ogino, Ryo
    Hosokawa, Yukinari
    Kishimoto, Shun
    Nakahara, Ryuta
    Shimada, Chiaki
    Kawamorita, Ryu
    Tada, Takuhito
    Hayashi, Yoshiki
    Nakajima, Toshifumi
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8 (02) : E49 - E55
  • [22] Urologists' Use of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Mitchell, Jean M.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (17): : 1629 - 1637
  • [23] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: Supportive data for prostate cancer
    Cahlon, Oren
    Hunt, Margie
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2008, 18 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [24] Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Shahinian, Vahakn B.
    Kaufman, Samuel R.
    Yan, Phyllis
    Herrel, Lindsey A.
    Borza, Tudor
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (25)
  • [25] Treatment-Related Toxicity Using Prostate-Only Versus Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: A National Population-Based Study
    Parry, Matthew G.
    Sujenthiran, Arunan
    Cowling, Thomas E.
    Nossiter, Julie
    Cathcart, Paul
    Clarke, Noel W.
    Payne, Heather
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Aggarwal, Ajay
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (21) : 1828 - +
  • [26] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Toxicity
    Yu, James B.
    Cramer, Laura D.
    Herrin, Jeph
    Soulos, Pamela R.
    Potosky, Arnold L.
    Gross, Cary P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (12) : 1195 - +
  • [27] Moderately hypofractionated prostate-only versus whole-pelvis radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective real-world single-center cohort study
    Brandell, Jenny Kahlmeter
    Valachis, Antonis
    Ugge, Henrik
    Smith, Daniel
    Johansson, Bengt
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 48
  • [28] Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer confined to the pelvis: analysis of efficacy and late toxicity
    Liu, Yue-Ping
    Gray, Phillip J.
    Jin, Jing
    Wang, Wei-Hu
    Fang, Hui
    Wang, Shu-Lian
    Song, Yong-Wen
    Ren, Hua
    Liu, Xin-Fan
    Yu, Zi-Hao
    Dai, Jian-Rong
    Li, Ye-Xiong
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 4 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [29] Toxicity after intensity-modulated, radiation therapy of image-guided prostate cancer
    Guckenberger, M.
    Ok, S.
    Polat, B.
    Sweeney, R. A.
    Flentje, M.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 186 : 60 - 61
  • [30] Dosimetric effects of weight loss or gain during volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Pair, Matthew L.
    Du, Weiliang
    Rojas, Hector D.
    Kanke, James E.
    McGuire, Sean E.
    Lee, Andrew K.
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 251 - 254