CLINICAL TOXICITIES AND DOSIMETRIC PARAMETERS AFTER WHOLE-PELVIS VERSUS PROSTATE-ONLY INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER

被引:31
|
作者
Deville, Curtiland [1 ]
Both, Stefan [1 ]
Hwang, Wei-Ting [2 ]
Tochner, Zelig [1 ]
Vapiwala, Neha [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Pelvic nodal irradiation; Whole pelvis; IMRT; Toxicity; Prostate cancer; PHASE-III TRIAL; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; DOSE-VOLUME CONSTRAINTS; LATE RECTAL TOXICITY; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; ONCOLOGY GROUP-9413; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; NEOADJUVANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.043
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess whether whole-pelvis (WP) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is associated with increased toxicity compared with prostate-only (PO) IMRT. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with prostate cancer undergoing definitive IMRT to 79.2 Gy with concurrent androgen deprivation at our institution from November 2005 to May 2007 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Thirty patients received initial WP IMRT to 45 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions, and thirty patients received PO IMRT. Study patients underwent computed tomography simulation and treatment planning by use of predefined dose constraints. Bladder and rectal dose volume histograms, maximum genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity grade, and late Grade 2 or greater toxicity-free survival curves were compared between the two groups by use of the Student t test, Fisher exact test, and Kaplan-Meier curve, respectively. Results: Bladder minimum dose, mean dose, median dose, volume receiving 5 Gy, volume receiving 20 Gy, volume receiving 40 Gy, and volume receiving 45 Gy and rectal minimum dose, median dose, and volume receiving 20 Gy were significantly increased in the WP group (all p values < 0.01). Maximum acute GI toxicity was limited to Grade 2 and was significantly increased in the WP group at 50% vs. 13% the PO group (p = 0.006). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 12-35 months), there was no difference in late GI toxicity (p = 0.884) or in acute or late GU toxicity. Conclusions: Despite dosimetric differences in the volume of bowel, bladder, and rectum irradiated in the low-dose and median-dose regions, WP IMRT results only in a clinically significant increase in acute GI toxicity, in comparison to PO IMRT, with no difference in GU or late GI toxicity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 772
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Salvage Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Cryotherapy
    Choi, Mehee
    Kim, Choong R.
    Hung, Arthur Y.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2013, 11 (02) : 85 - 88
  • [32] Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated solutions for intact prostate cancer
    Neill, Cory J.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (04) : 366 - 372
  • [33] Decreased acute toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with prostate-based versus bone-based image guidance
    Nakamura, Kiyonao
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    Inokuchi, Haruo
    Ikeda, Itaru
    Inoue, Takahiro
    Kamba, Tomomi
    Ogawa, Osamu
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (01) : 158 - 164
  • [34] Decreased acute toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with prostate-based versus bone-based image guidance
    Kiyonao Nakamura
    Takashi Mizowaki
    Haruo Inokuchi
    Itaru Ikeda
    Takahiro Inoue
    Tomomi Kamba
    Osamu Ogawa
    Masahiro Hiraoka
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 23 : 158 - 164
  • [35] Re: Urologists' Use of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Mitchell, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (05): : 1292 - 1292
  • [36] Application of dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy to the treatment of prostate cancer
    Engler, MJ
    Tsai, JS
    Vora, S
    Wazer, DE
    DiPetrillo, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 193 - 193
  • [37] Acute patient-reported toxicities after proton therapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Gergelis, Kimberly
    Bai, Miao
    Whitaker, Thomas
    Routman, David M.
    Sir, Mustafa
    Choo, Richard
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [38] Regarding Relative Toxicities of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity- Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Fuller, Donald B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (30) : 3455 - U145
  • [39] Whole pelvis versus prostate-only radiotherapy with or without short course androgen deprivation therapy and mortality risk
    Braunstein, Lior Z.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Dosoretz, Daniel E.
    Salenius, Sharon
    Katin, Michael
    Nanda, Akash
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [40] Predictors of hematological toxicity after whole-pelvis intensity-modulated post-prostatectomy radiotherapy
    Sini, C.
    Fiorino, C.
    Chiorda, B. Noris
    Chiara, A.
    Deantoni, C.
    Gumina, C.
    Perna, L.
    Sbalchiero, A.
    Calandrino, R.
    Di Muzio, N.
    Cozzarini, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S257 - S257