Safety and Efficacy of MRI Scans in Patients With Implanted Microvascular Coupling Devices

被引:3
|
作者
Phalke, Neelam [1 ]
Thomas, W. Walsh [2 ]
Azzi, James [2 ]
Li, Ryan J. [2 ]
Petrisor, Daniel [3 ]
Wax, Mark K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, 3181 Sw Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Oral Maxillofacial Surg, 3181 Sw Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2020年 / 130卷 / 06期
关键词
MRI compatibility; microvascular reconstruction; microvascular coupler; MRI safety; head and neck reconstruction; BIOMEDICAL IMPLANTS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1002/lary.28275
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective To demonstrate the safety and compatibility of microvascular couplers in patients undergoing postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Study Design Retrospective case series. Methods A consecutive review of 1,252 patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction at Oregon Health and Sciences University (OHSU) between 2010 and 2017 who had microvascular coupler Synovis, Baxter Deerfield, IL (Synovis Life Technologies, Saint Paul, MN) implantation were reviewed. One hundred fifteen patients had a subsequent MRI scan, which consisted of a variety of Phillips (Amsterdam, Netherlands) MRI machines ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 Tesla (T) in magnetic strength. Results These 115 patients underwent 121 free flaps with 131 couplers (including 32 flow couplers) utilized for venous anastomoses. Couplers ranged in size from 1.5 to 4.0 mm (3.0 mm [42%] followed by 3.5 mm [21%], 2.5 mm [19%], 2.0 mm [10%], 4.0 mm [6%], and 1.5 mm [2%]. Three hundred fifty-nine MRI scans (2 days to 91 months postoperatively) were obtained with 233 MRIs for cancer surveillance, and the remaining were obtained for neurologic disease, injury, or evaluation for metastases. No complications occurred related to the MRI and the metallic components of the coupler or other metal implants, such as reconstruction bars, vascular clips, or metallic surgical mesh. Additionally, no radiology report commented on MRI distortion due to the coupler placement, which contrasts the distortion seen with the other metallic implants. Conclusion Microvascular couplers and their constitutive stainless-steel pins have not been found to cause any complications in a large series of consecutive patients undergoing multiple MRIs with magnetic strength up to 3 T. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration advocates medical alert notification for patients with couplers; however, hesitation regarding potential MRI scanning for surveillance or otherwise is unwarranted. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1428-1430, 2020
引用
收藏
页码:1428 / 1430
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety of nerve conduction studies in patients with implanted cardiac devices
    Schoeck, Andreas P.
    Mellion, Michelle L.
    Gilchrist, James M.
    Christian, Fredric V.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2007, 35 (04) : 521 - 524
  • [22] Standardized Approaches to MR Safety Assessment of Patients with Implanted Devices
    Kanal, Emanuel
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 28 (04) : 537 - +
  • [23] Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implanted cardiovascular devices
    Demir, Serdar
    Yuksel, Serkan
    Sahin, Mahmut
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 36 (07): : 485 - 496
  • [24] Safety of transient elastography in patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices
    Friedrich-Rust, Mireen
    Schoelzel, Fabian
    Linzbach, Sven
    Bojunga, Joerg
    Zeuzem, Stefan
    Seeger, Florian
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 (03) : 314 - 316
  • [25] 1000 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS EVALUATED FOR SAFETY AND EFFICACY: A FOCUSED STUDY OF PROHIBITED DEVICES IN THE MRI ENVIRONMENT
    Biederman, Robert W. W.
    Gevenosky, Loretta
    Samar, Huma
    Williams, Ronald
    Lombardi, Richard
    Shah, Moneal
    Farah, Victor
    Mangini, Francesco
    Bonnet, Christopher
    Doyle, Mark
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 3585 - 3585
  • [26] MRI Safety for Patients Implanted With the MRI Ready ICD System MRI Ready Study Results
    Nazarian, Saman
    Cantillon, Daniel J.
    Woodard, Pamela K.
    Mela, Theofanie
    Cline, Adam M.
    Strickberger, Adam S.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 5 (08) : 935 - 943
  • [27] Evaluation of a compact 3 T MRI scanner for patients with implanted devices
    Speltz, Lydia J. Bardwell
    Shu, Yunhong
    Watson, Robert E.
    Trzasko, Joshua D.
    In, Myung-Ho
    Gray, Erin M.
    Halverson, Maria A.
    Tarasek, Matthew R.
    Hua, Yihe
    Huston III, John
    Cogswell, Petrice M.
    Foo, Thomas K. F.
    Bernstein, Matt A.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 103 : 109 - 118
  • [28] MRI in Patients with Active Implanted Medical Devices: Demand Will Only Grow
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Andrews, Trevor J.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2024, 44 (03)
  • [29] Assessment of patients' knowledge and perceptions of MRI scans and safety in Saudi Arabia
    Alghamdi, Sami A.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [30] An automated computational tool to study MRI safety of implanted passive cardiovascular medical devices
    Baretta, A.
    Bursi, R.
    Palazzin, A.
    Emili, L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 3453 - 3453