Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser

被引:33
|
作者
Kynlgopoulos, M. [1 ]
Schlote, T. [1 ]
Kotecha, A. [2 ]
Tzamalis, A. [1 ]
Pajic, B. [1 ]
Haefliger, I. [3 ]
机构
[1] Clin Pallas, Dept Ophthalmol, CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
[2] City Univ London, Dept Optometry, London EC1V 0HB, England
[3] Univ Eye Clin, Lab Ocular Pharmacol & Physiol, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
ocular response analyzer; corneal hysteresis; corneal resistance factor; corneal compensated IOP;
D O I
10.1055/s-2008-1027256
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: The Ocular Response Analyser (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments) is a non-contact applanation tonometer, providing two measures of intraocular pressure (IOP) - IOPg which represents a Goldmann equivalent IOP measure and IOPcc, representing a measure of IOP independent of corneal effects. In addition, the device provides two measures believed to represent corneal biomechanical properties: corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of these measurements. Patients and Methods: One randomly chosen eye from 49 healthy volunteers was measured four times consecutively with the ORA prior to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The repeatability coefficient (RC), the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated as a measure of intrasession repeatability. Results: CH was the most variable and IOPg the most repeatable measure, with an RC of 2.61 and 1.97, respectively, and ICC of 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. CV ranged between 5.73% for IOPg and 12.38% for CH. ORA IOP measurements were higher than GAT (IOPcc=17.43 +/- 3.23; IOPg = 17.53 +/- 3.0; GAT = 15.75 +/- 2.77 mmHg). Conclusions: ORA measurements show good short-term repeatability in normal volunteers. Thus, this device appears to be applicable in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 360
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measurements of ocular properties in response to intraocular pressure changes using an ultrasonic system
    He, Xiaoyin
    Liu, Jun
    2006 28TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-15, 2006, : 3026 - +
  • [22] Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation
    Kucumen, Raciha Beril
    Yenerel, Nursal Melda
    Gorgun, Ebru
    Kulacoglu, Destan Nil
    Oncel, Banu
    Kohen, Maryo Cenk
    Alimgil, Murat Levent
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (12): : 2096 - 2098
  • [23] Characterising biomechanical properties of healthy human corneas with the Ocular Response Analyser and CorvisST
    Buckhurst, Hetal D.
    Purslow, Christine
    Buckhurst, Phillip J.
    Oehring, Daniela
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [24] Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer
    Detry-Morel, Michele
    Jamart, Jacques
    Pourjavan, Saveh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) : 138 - 148
  • [25] Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Prata, Tiago S.
    Sousa, Aline K.
    Garcia Filho, Carlos A. A.
    Doi, Larissa M.
    Paranhos, Augusto, Jr.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2009, 44 (05): : 602 - 602
  • [26] Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement - Quantitative analysis
    Liu, J
    Roberts, CJ
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (01): : 146 - 155
  • [27] Wave -score -dependent variation in measurements of intraocular pressure and of ocular biomechanical parameters
    Yuhas, Phillip Thomas
    Mahmoud, Ashraf M.
    Roberts, Cynthia J.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [28] Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using an ocular response analyser to examine aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery
    Simsek, Tulay
    Soba, Dilek Ozcelik
    Tirhis, Mehmet Hakan
    Yilmazbas, Pelin
    Ozturk, Faruk
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2016, 94 (03) : E198 - E203
  • [29] Intra-ocular pressure measurements using the Ocular Response Analyser and ICare tonometer: A comparison
    Gillan, Wayne D. H.
    AFRICAN VISION AND EYE HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 74 (01):
  • [30] Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST
    Lopes, Bernardo T.
    Roberts, Cynthia J.
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    Vinciguerra, Riccardo
    Vinciguerra, Paolo
    Reisdorf, Sven
    Berger, Stefanie
    Koprowski, Robert
    Ambrosio, Renato, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 2017