Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser

被引:33
|
作者
Kynlgopoulos, M. [1 ]
Schlote, T. [1 ]
Kotecha, A. [2 ]
Tzamalis, A. [1 ]
Pajic, B. [1 ]
Haefliger, I. [3 ]
机构
[1] Clin Pallas, Dept Ophthalmol, CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
[2] City Univ London, Dept Optometry, London EC1V 0HB, England
[3] Univ Eye Clin, Lab Ocular Pharmacol & Physiol, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
ocular response analyzer; corneal hysteresis; corneal resistance factor; corneal compensated IOP;
D O I
10.1055/s-2008-1027256
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: The Ocular Response Analyser (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments) is a non-contact applanation tonometer, providing two measures of intraocular pressure (IOP) - IOPg which represents a Goldmann equivalent IOP measure and IOPcc, representing a measure of IOP independent of corneal effects. In addition, the device provides two measures believed to represent corneal biomechanical properties: corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of these measurements. Patients and Methods: One randomly chosen eye from 49 healthy volunteers was measured four times consecutively with the ORA prior to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The repeatability coefficient (RC), the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated as a measure of intrasession repeatability. Results: CH was the most variable and IOPg the most repeatable measure, with an RC of 2.61 and 1.97, respectively, and ICC of 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. CV ranged between 5.73% for IOPg and 12.38% for CH. ORA IOP measurements were higher than GAT (IOPcc=17.43 +/- 3.23; IOPg = 17.53 +/- 3.0; GAT = 15.75 +/- 2.77 mmHg). Conclusions: ORA measurements show good short-term repeatability in normal volunteers. Thus, this device appears to be applicable in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 360
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corneal biomechanical properties measured by the ocular response analyzer in acromegalic patients
    Sen, Emine
    Tutuncu, Yasemin
    Balikoglu-Yilmaz, Melike
    Elgin, Ufuk
    Berker, Dilek
    Ozturk, Faruk
    Guler, Serdar
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 252 (08) : 1283 - 1288
  • [32] Corneal biomechanical properties measured by the ocular response analyzer in acromegalic patients
    Emine Sen
    Yasemin Tutuncu
    Melike Balikoglu-Yilmaz
    Ufuk Elgin
    Dilek Berker
    Faruk Ozturk
    Serdar Guler
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2014, 252 : 1283 - 1288
  • [33] Corneal Biomechanical Properties of various types of glaucoma and their impact on measurement of intraocular pressure
    Zhang, Yang
    Bian, Ailing
    Hang, Qijun
    Li, Luee
    Zhang, Shunhua
    Cheng, Gangwei
    Zhou, Qi
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2023, 66 (01) : 749 - 756
  • [34] Comparison of Goldmann applanation and Ocular Response Analyser tonometry: intraocular pressure agreement and patient preference
    Paul McCann
    Ruth E. Hogg
    David M. Wright
    Bernadette McGuinness
    Ian S. Young
    Frank Kee
    Augusto Azuara-Blanco
    Eye, 2020, 34 : 584 - 590
  • [35] Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Intraocular Pressure in Myopic Spanish Healthy Population
    del Buey, Maria A.
    Lavilla, Laura
    Ascaso, Francisco J.
    Lanchares, Elena
    Huerva, Valentin
    Cristobal, Jose A.
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 2014
  • [36] Effects of Eye Rubbing and Breath Holding on Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Intraocular Pressure
    Liu, Wan-Cherng
    Lee, Shui-Mei
    Graham, Andrew D.
    Lin, Meng C.
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (08) : 855 - 860
  • [37] Measurement of Corneal Biomechanical Properties using Corneal Visualisation Scheimpflug Technology and Ocular Response Analyser in Healthy Saudi Female Adults: A Cross-sectional Study
    Maqsood, Farah
    Aldossari, Noura
    Al Matrafi, Menwah
    Amina, Musarat
    Bawazir, Maram m
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 18 (12) : NC1 - NC6
  • [38] The Effect of Overnight Corneal Edema and Diurnal Variation of Ocular Response Analyser and Goldmann Tonometry Measurements
    Lau, W. M.
    Pye, D. C.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [39] Comparison of Goldmann applanation and Ocular Response Analyser tonometry: intraocular pressure agreement and patient preference
    McCann, Paul
    Hogg, Ruth E.
    Wright, David M.
    McGuinness, Bernadette
    Young, Ian S.
    Kee, Frank
    Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
    EYE, 2020, 34 (03) : 584 - 590
  • [40] Assessment of the Ocular Response Analyzer as an Instrument for Measurement of Intraocular Pressure and Corneal Biomechanics
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    Joda, Akram
    Abass, Ahmed
    Garway-Heath, David
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2015, 40 (11) : 1111 - 1119