Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST

被引:71
|
作者
Lopes, Bernardo T. [1 ,2 ]
Roberts, Cynthia J. [3 ,4 ]
Elsheikh, Ahmed [5 ]
Vinciguerra, Riccardo [6 ]
Vinciguerra, Paolo [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Reisdorf, Sven [10 ]
Berger, Stefanie [10 ]
Koprowski, Robert [11 ]
Ambrosio, Renato, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomog & Biomech Study Grp, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Liverpool, Sch Engn, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[6] Univ Insubria, Div Ophthalmol, Dept Surg Sci, Varese, Italy
[7] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Eye Ctr, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Italy
[8] Humanitas Univ, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Italy
[9] Vincieye Clin, Milan, Italy
[10] OCULUS Opt Gerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany
[11] Univ Silesia, Inst Comp Sci, Fac Comp Sci & Mat Sci, Dept Biomed Comp Syst, Bedzinska 39, PL-41200 Sosnowiec, Poland
关键词
BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; ECTASIA; HEALTHY;
D O I
10.1155/2017/8515742
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of dynamic corneal response parameters measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Methods. One eye randomly selected from 32 healthy volunteers was examined by the Corvis ST. Three different devices were used in an alternated random order for taking three measurements at each device in each subject. Standard intraocular pressure (IOP), the biomechanical-compensated IOP (bIOP), and DCR parameters were evaluated. The within-subject standard deviation (zeta w) and coefficient of variation (CV) were assessed. Results. Regarding pressure indices, the zeta w was below 1 mmHg for repeatability (0.98 for IOP and 0.89 for bIOP) and the CV was 6.6% for IOP and 6.1% for bIOP. For reproducibility, the zeta w was around 1 mmHg (1.12 for IOP and 1.05 for bIOP) and the CV was 7.6% for IOP and 7.1% for bIOP. Most of DCR indices presented CV for repeatability below 4%. For reproducibility, the CV of most of the indices were below 6%. The deformation amplitude (DA) ratio in 1 mm and integrated radius were below 4% (1.2% and 3.8%, resp.). Conclusions. The Corvis ST showed good precision (repeatability and reproducibility) for IOP measurements and for DCR in healthy eyes.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal biomechanical parameters derived from Corvis ST
    Serbecic, Nermin
    Beutelspacher, Sven
    Markovic, Lovro
    Roy, Abhijit Sina
    Shetty, Rohit
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 30 (06) : 1287 - 1294
  • [2] Corneal Parameters in Healthy Subjects Assessed by Corvis ST
    Salouti, Ramin
    Bagheri, Mansoureh
    Shamsi, Anis
    Zamani, Mohammad
    Ghoreyshi, Maryam
    Nowroozzadeh, M. Hossein
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC & VISION RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [3] Repeatability of the Novel Intraocular Pressure Measurement From Corvis ST
    Matsuura, Masato
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Fujino, Yuri
    Yanagisawa, Mieko
    Nakao, Yoshitaka
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    Asaoka, Ryo
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 8 (03):
  • [4] The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry Measured Corneal Parameters and Intraocular Pressure, Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature
    Asaoka, Ryo
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Tabuchi, Hitoshi
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Nakao, Yoshitaka
    Ihara, Noriko
    Rimayanti, Ulfah
    Aihara, Makoto
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [5] Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST)
    Steinberg, J.
    Mehlan, J.
    Frings, A.
    Druchkiv, V.
    Richard, G.
    Katz, T.
    Linke, S. J.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2015, 112 (09): : 770 - 777
  • [6] Intraocular Pressure Before and After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Prospective Comparison of Corvis ST and Ocular Response Analyzer
    Salouti, Ramin
    Azimi, Ali
    Meshksar, Aidin
    Takapouy, Ramin
    Ghoreyshi, Maryam
    Salouti, Kia
    Razeghinejad, Reza
    Nowroozzadeh, Mohammad Hossein
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2024, 33 (10) : 780 - 784
  • [7] Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis
    Matsuura, Masato
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Fujino, Yuri
    Yanagisawa, Mieko
    Nakao, Yoshitaka
    Tokumo, Kana
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    Asaoka, Ryo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 104 (04) : 563 - 568
  • [8] Repeatability and Reproducibility for Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Dynamic Contour, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Sullivan-Mee, Michael
    Gerhardt, Gretchen
    Halverson, Kathy D.
    Qualls, Clifford
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2009, 18 (09) : 666 - 673
  • [9] Influence of Pachymetry and Intraocular Pressure on Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters in Healthy Patients
    Vinciguerra, Riccardo
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    Roberts, Cynthia J.
    Ambrosio, Renato, Jr.
    Kang, David Sung Yong
    Lopes, Bernardo T.
    Morenghi, Emanuela
    Azzolini, Claudio
    Vinciguerra, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 32 (08) : 550 - 561
  • [10] Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST
    Ramm, Lisa
    Herber, Robert
    Spoerl, Eberhard
    Raiskup, Frederik
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    Terai, Naim
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 2019