Multi-detector row CT colonography: Effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen

被引:40
|
作者
Taylor, SA
Halligan, S
Bartram, CI
Morgan, PR
Talbot, IC
Fry, N
Saunders, BP
Khosraviani, K
Atkin, W
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Dept Intestinal Imaging, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[2] St Marks Hosp, Dept Pathol, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[3] St Marks Hosp, Dept Surg, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[4] St Marks Hosp, Dpet Endoscopy, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[5] St Marks Hosp, Canc Res UK Colorectal Canc Unit, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[6] Gen Elect Med Syst, Slough, Berks, England
关键词
colon; CT; colon neoplasms; computer tomography (CT); technology;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2291020561
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of orientation, collimation, pitch, and tube current setting on polyp detection at multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to determine the optimal combination of scanning parameters for screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A colectomy specimen containing 117 polyps of different sizes was insufflated and imaged with a multi-detector row CT scanner at various collimation (1.25 and 2.5 mm), pitch (3 and 6), and tube current (50, 100, and 150 mA) settings. Two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted images and three-dimensional endoluminal surface renderings from the 12 resultant data sets were examined by one observer for the presence and conspicuity of polyps. The results were analyzed with Poisson regression and logistic regression to determine the effects of scanning parameters and of specimen orientation on polyp detection. RESULTS: The percentage of polyps that were detected significantly increased when collimation (P = .008) and table feed (P = .03) were decreased. Increased tube current resulted in improved detection only of polyps with a diameter of less than 5 mm. Polyps of less than 5 mm were optimally depicted with a collimation of 1.25 mm, a pitch of 3, and a tube current setting of 150 mA; polyps with a diameter greater than 5 mm were adequately depicted with 1.25-mm collimation and with either pitch setting and any of the three tube current settings. Small Polyps in the transverse segment (positioned at a 90degrees angle to the z axis of scanning) were significantly less visible than those in parallel or oblique orientations (P < .001). The effective radiation dose, calculated with a Monte Carlo simulation, was 1.4-10.0 mSv. CONCLUSION: Detection of small polyps (< 5 mm) with multi-detector row CT is highly dependent on collimation, pitch, and, to a lesser extent, tube current. Collimation of 1.25 mm, combined with pitch of 6 and tube current of 50 mA, provides for reliable detection of polyps 5 mm or larger while limiting the effective radiation dose. Polyps smaller than 5 mm, however, may be poorly depicted with use of these settings in the transverse colon. (C) RSNA, 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 118
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Muttislice CT colonography: Effect of collimation, pitch and orientation on polyp detection determined using a human colectomy specimen
    Taylor, SA
    Halligan, S
    Bartram, CI
    Atkin, W
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 584 - 585
  • [2] Colonic distention in multi-detector row CT colonography
    Bruzzi, JF
    Fenlon, HM
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (01) : 282 - 282
  • [3] CT colonography: Single-versus multi-detector row imaging
    Hara, AK
    Johnson, CD
    MacCarty, RL
    Welch, TJ
    McCollough, CH
    Harmen, WS
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (02) : 461 - 465
  • [4] Detection of colorectal polyps: Comparison of multi-detector row CT and MR colonography in a colon phantom
    Wessling, Johannes
    Fischbach, Roman
    Borchert, Alexandra
    Kugel, Harald
    Allkemper, Thomas
    Osada, Nani
    Heindel, Walter
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (01) : 125 - 131
  • [5] Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: Improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT
    Schoepf, UJ
    Holzknecht, N
    Helmberger, TK
    Crispin, A
    Hong, C
    Becker, CR
    Reiser, MF
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (02) : 483 - 490
  • [6] Prospective comparison of 64 multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
    Chang, Uk Sun
    Park, Dong Kyun
    Kim, Ju Hyun
    Kim, Yu Kyung
    Kwon, Kwang An
    Yu, Sang Kyun
    Song, Kee Sup
    Jung, Hyuk Sang
    Jang, Chang Soo
    Kim, Min Ju
    Park, Chul Hee
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 21 : A503 - A503
  • [7] CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT - Study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom
    Wessling, J
    Fischbach, R
    Meier, N
    Allkemper, T
    Klusmeier, J
    Ludwig, K
    Heindel, W
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (03) : 753 - 759
  • [8] Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT
    Primak, Andrew N.
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    Bruesewitz, Michael R.
    Zhang, Jie
    Fletcher, Joel G.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 (06) : 1785 - 1794
  • [9] Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: Effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter
    Taylor, SA
    Halligan, S
    Goh, V
    Morley, S
    Bassett, P
    Atkin, W
    Bartram, CI
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) : 99 - 108
  • [10] Cardiovascular effects at multi-detector row CT colonography compared with those at conventional endoscopy of the colon
    Taylor, SA
    Halligan, S
    O'Donnell, C
    Morley, S
    Mistry, H
    Saunders, BP
    Vance, M
    Bassett, P
    Windsor, A
    Stern, Y
    Bethel, H
    Atkin, W
    Bartram, CI
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (03) : 782 - 790