Multi-detector row CT colonography: Effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen

被引:40
|
作者
Taylor, SA
Halligan, S
Bartram, CI
Morgan, PR
Talbot, IC
Fry, N
Saunders, BP
Khosraviani, K
Atkin, W
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Dept Intestinal Imaging, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[2] St Marks Hosp, Dept Pathol, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[3] St Marks Hosp, Dept Surg, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[4] St Marks Hosp, Dpet Endoscopy, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[5] St Marks Hosp, Canc Res UK Colorectal Canc Unit, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[6] Gen Elect Med Syst, Slough, Berks, England
关键词
colon; CT; colon neoplasms; computer tomography (CT); technology;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2291020561
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of orientation, collimation, pitch, and tube current setting on polyp detection at multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to determine the optimal combination of scanning parameters for screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A colectomy specimen containing 117 polyps of different sizes was insufflated and imaged with a multi-detector row CT scanner at various collimation (1.25 and 2.5 mm), pitch (3 and 6), and tube current (50, 100, and 150 mA) settings. Two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted images and three-dimensional endoluminal surface renderings from the 12 resultant data sets were examined by one observer for the presence and conspicuity of polyps. The results were analyzed with Poisson regression and logistic regression to determine the effects of scanning parameters and of specimen orientation on polyp detection. RESULTS: The percentage of polyps that were detected significantly increased when collimation (P = .008) and table feed (P = .03) were decreased. Increased tube current resulted in improved detection only of polyps with a diameter of less than 5 mm. Polyps of less than 5 mm were optimally depicted with a collimation of 1.25 mm, a pitch of 3, and a tube current setting of 150 mA; polyps with a diameter greater than 5 mm were adequately depicted with 1.25-mm collimation and with either pitch setting and any of the three tube current settings. Small Polyps in the transverse segment (positioned at a 90degrees angle to the z axis of scanning) were significantly less visible than those in parallel or oblique orientations (P < .001). The effective radiation dose, calculated with a Monte Carlo simulation, was 1.4-10.0 mSv. CONCLUSION: Detection of small polyps (< 5 mm) with multi-detector row CT is highly dependent on collimation, pitch, and, to a lesser extent, tube current. Collimation of 1.25 mm, combined with pitch of 6 and tube current of 50 mA, provides for reliable detection of polyps 5 mm or larger while limiting the effective radiation dose. Polyps smaller than 5 mm, however, may be poorly depicted with use of these settings in the transverse colon. (C) RSNA, 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 118
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Benefits of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography for preoperative staging in colorectal cancer patients
    Iinuma, G
    Moriyama, N
    Satake, M
    Miyakawa, K
    Muramatsu, Y
    Tateishi, U
    Akasu, T
    Otake, Y
    Fujii, T
    Kobayashi, T
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTION: METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, 5031 : 398 - 404
  • [22] False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: Multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions
    Park, SH
    Ha, HK
    Kim, MJ
    Kim, KW
    Kim, AY
    Yang, DH
    Lee, MG
    Kim, PN
    Shin, YM
    Yang, SK
    Myung, SJ
    Min, YI
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) : 495 - 502
  • [23] Colorectal neoplasms: Prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection
    Macari, M
    Bini, EJ
    Xue, XN
    Milano, A
    Katz, SS
    Resnick, D
    Chandarana, H
    Krinsky, G
    Klingenbeck, K
    Marshall, CH
    Megibow, AJ
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (02) : 383 - 392
  • [24] Multi-detector row helical CT in preoperative assessment of small (≤1.5 cm) liver metastases:: Is thinner collimation better?
    Haider, MA
    Amitai, MM
    Rappaport, DC
    O'Malley, ME
    Hanbidge, AE
    Redston, M
    Lockwood, GA
    Gallinger, S
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (01) : 137 - 142
  • [25] Multi-detector row CT: Effect of iodine dose reduction on hepatic and vascular enhancement
    Roos, JE
    Desbiolles, LM
    Weishaupt, D
    Wildermuth, S
    Hilfiker, PR
    Marincek, B
    Boehm, T
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2004, 176 (04): : 556 - 563
  • [26] What is the effect of varying "pitch" on patient radiation dose in a multi-detector CT scanner?
    Mahesh, M
    Scatarige, JC
    Cooper, J
    Fishman, EK
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 487 - 488
  • [27] Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: Detection with double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT
    Murakami, T
    Kim, T
    Takamura, M
    Hori, M
    Takahashi, S
    Federle, MP
    Tsuda, K
    Osuga, K
    Kawata, S
    Nakamura, H
    Kudo, M
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) : 763 - 767
  • [28] Computer-aided detection of polyps in CT colonography: Performance comparison between single- and multi-detector CT
    Yoshida, H
    Nappi, JJ
    Frimmel, H
    Miller, FH
    Dalal, KA
    Dachman, AH
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 304 - 305
  • [29] Double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma
    Murakami, T
    Kim, T
    Hori, M
    Federle, MP
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (03) : 931 - 932
  • [30] Science to practice - What multi-detector row CT parameters are best for detection of colon polyps?
    Brink, JA
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) : 1 - 2