Minipig Model of Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis: Immunohistochemical and Histomorphometric Analysis of the Sequence of Osteogenesis

被引:2
|
作者
Papadaki, Maria E. [1 ]
Kaban, Leonard B. [1 ]
Troulis, Maria J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
SUTURAL EXPANSION OSTEOGENESIS; MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION; BONE-FORMATION; MIDFACE ADVANCEMENT; GRADUAL DISTRACTION; CLEFT-PALATE; FOLLOW-UP; DEVICE; TRANSPORT; DOGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.030
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To document the sequence of bone formation in a minipig model of Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis (DO) using immunohistochemistry and histomorphometry. Materials and Methods: Female Yucatan minipigs (N = 9) in the mixed-dentition stage underwent bilateral maxillary DO. The distraction protocol was 0 days of latency, with a distraction rate of 1 mm/d for 12 days and 24 days of fixation. Specimens were harvested and divided between the central incisors (18 hemi-maxillae) at the end of DO (n = 6), at mid-fixation (n = 6), and at the end of fixation (n = 6). Sections, including the advancement zone, were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, collagen II, CD34, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. Light and fluorescence microscope images (original magnification x200) were obtained, and percentage of surface area (PSA) of the advancement zone occupied by fibrous tissue, vessels, proliferating cells, osteoid, and bone was determined. An intact maxilla served as the control. Results: At the end of DO, in the advancement zone, the PSA (mean values) of proliferating cells was 33.16%; fibrous tissue, 52%; vessels, 4.35%; and new bone, 5.45%. At the end of fixation, the PSA of proliferating cells decreased to 10.53%, fibrous tissue to 2.3%, and vessels to 1.5% whereas the PSA of new bone increased to 44.9%. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the progression of osteogenesis in the maxillary DO wound begins with intense cellular proliferation and vascular fibrous tissue formation and progresses to mature, cancellous bone by the end of fixation. The PSA occupied by mature bone is significantly less than in the control maxilla at the end of fixation. This is consistent with the sequence in the mandibular DO wound. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2629-2640, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:2629 / 2640
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Midface and maxillary distraction osteogenesis: development of an internal modular distraction system
    Cohen, SR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, 1997, : 289 - 301
  • [32] Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in a patient with pycnodysostosis: A case report
    Norholt, SE
    Bjerregaard, J
    Mosekilde, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 62 (08) : 1037 - 1040
  • [33] CT Analysis After Distraction Osteogenesis in Pierre Robin Sequence
    Roy, Saswata
    Munson, Patrick D.
    Zhao, Linping
    Holinger, Lauren D.
    Patel, Pravin K.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2009, 119 (02): : 380 - 386
  • [34] Maxillary profaction or distraction osteogenesis in cleft patient.
    Kuroda, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 981 - 981
  • [35] Simultaneous maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis with a semiburied device
    Padwa, BL
    Kearns, GJ
    Todd, R
    Troulis, M
    Mulliken, JB
    Kaban, LB
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 28 (01) : 2 - 8
  • [36] The Palatal Approach to Distraction Osteogenesis of the Anterior Maxillary Alveolus
    Bell, Robert E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (07) : 1283 - 1287
  • [37] Breakage of internal maxillary distractor: considerable complication of maxillary distraction osteogenesis
    Aikawa, Tomonao
    Iida, Seiji
    Isomura, Emiko T.
    Namikawa, Mari
    Matsuoka, Yudai
    Yamada, Chiaki
    Yamamoto, Taku
    Takigawa, Yoko
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2008, 106 (01): : E1 - E7
  • [38] In vitro analysis of distraction osteogenesis
    Matsuno, M
    Hata, KI
    Sumi, Y
    Mizuno, H
    Ueda, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 11 (04) : 303 - 307
  • [39] Microscopic changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible
    Thurmüller, P
    Troulis, MJ
    Rosenberg, A
    Chuang, SK
    Kaban, LB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 64 (02) : 249 - 258
  • [40] Effects of laser vs ultrasound on bone healing after distraction osteogenesis: A histomorphometric analysis
    Barros Medeiros, Myrla Alves
    Andrade Gomes do Nascimento, Leonard Euler
    Leon Lau, Thiago Chon
    Bezerra Barradas Mineiro, Ana Lys
    Pithon, Matheus Melo
    Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (04) : 555 - 561