Minipig Model of Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis: Immunohistochemical and Histomorphometric Analysis of the Sequence of Osteogenesis

被引:2
|
作者
Papadaki, Maria E. [1 ]
Kaban, Leonard B. [1 ]
Troulis, Maria J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
SUTURAL EXPANSION OSTEOGENESIS; MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION; BONE-FORMATION; MIDFACE ADVANCEMENT; GRADUAL DISTRACTION; CLEFT-PALATE; FOLLOW-UP; DEVICE; TRANSPORT; DOGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.030
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To document the sequence of bone formation in a minipig model of Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis (DO) using immunohistochemistry and histomorphometry. Materials and Methods: Female Yucatan minipigs (N = 9) in the mixed-dentition stage underwent bilateral maxillary DO. The distraction protocol was 0 days of latency, with a distraction rate of 1 mm/d for 12 days and 24 days of fixation. Specimens were harvested and divided between the central incisors (18 hemi-maxillae) at the end of DO (n = 6), at mid-fixation (n = 6), and at the end of fixation (n = 6). Sections, including the advancement zone, were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, collagen II, CD34, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. Light and fluorescence microscope images (original magnification x200) were obtained, and percentage of surface area (PSA) of the advancement zone occupied by fibrous tissue, vessels, proliferating cells, osteoid, and bone was determined. An intact maxilla served as the control. Results: At the end of DO, in the advancement zone, the PSA (mean values) of proliferating cells was 33.16%; fibrous tissue, 52%; vessels, 4.35%; and new bone, 5.45%. At the end of fixation, the PSA of proliferating cells decreased to 10.53%, fibrous tissue to 2.3%, and vessels to 1.5% whereas the PSA of new bone increased to 44.9%. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the progression of osteogenesis in the maxillary DO wound begins with intense cellular proliferation and vascular fibrous tissue formation and progresses to mature, cancellous bone by the end of fixation. The PSA occupied by mature bone is significantly less than in the control maxilla at the end of fixation. This is consistent with the sequence in the mandibular DO wound. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2629-2640, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:2629 / 2640
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modeling distraction osteogenesis: analysis of the distraction rate
    E. Reina-Romo
    M. J. Gómez-Benito
    J. M. García-Aznar
    J. Domínguez
    M. Doblaré
    [J]. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2009, 8 : 323 - 335
  • [42] Modeling distraction osteogenesis: analysis of the distraction rate
    Reina-Romo, E.
    Gomez-Benito, M. J.
    Garcia-Aznar, J. M.
    Dominguez, J.
    Doblare, M.
    [J]. BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2009, 8 (04) : 323 - 335
  • [43] Histomorphometrical analysis of new bone obtained by distraction osteogenesis and osteogenesis by periosteal distraction in rabbits
    Sencimen, M.
    Aydintug, Y. S.
    Ortakoglu, K.
    Karslioglu, Y.
    Gunhan, O.
    Gunaydin, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 36 (03) : 235 - 242
  • [44] Histomorphometric evaluation of the effects of zoledronic acid on mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits
    Pampu, A. Alper
    Dolanmaz, Dogan
    Tuez, Hakan H.
    Avunduk, M. Cihat
    Kisnisci, Reha S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (05) : 905 - 910
  • [45] Distraction Osteogenesis of the Palate: An Experimental Model
    Menezes, John M.
    Stutman, Ross L.
    Murphy, Patrick S.
    Stephenson, Linda L.
    Zamboni, William A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (05) : 1583 - 1590
  • [46] A rat model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Ignelzi, MA
    Buchman, SR
    Goldstein, SA
    Radu, C
    Wilensky, JS
    Rosenthal, AH
    [J]. DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 1998, 34 : 141 - 152
  • [47] An in vitro model for dissecting distraction osteogenesis
    Carinci, F
    Pezzetti, F
    Spina, AM
    Palmieri, A
    Carls, F
    Laino, G
    De Rosa, A
    Farina, E
    Illiano, F
    Stabellini, G
    LoMuzio, L
    Perrotti, V
    Piattelli, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [48] A mathematical model for mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Schendel, SA
    Heegaard, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 7 (06) : 465 - 468
  • [49] A mouse model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Fang, TD
    Nacamuli, RP
    Song, HM
    Thomas, R
    Fong, KD
    Aalami, OO
    Longaker, MT
    [J]. CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 10, 2003, : 397 - 398
  • [50] Effects of growth on maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate
    Doucet, Jean-Charles
    Herlin, Christian
    Bigorre, Michele
    Baeumler, Caroline
    Subsol, Gerard
    Captier, Guillaume
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (08) : 836 - 841