Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Prassas, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Vossos, Vasileios [1 ,2 ]
Rehders, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Knoefel, Wolfram Trudo [1 ,2 ]
Krieg, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ, Dept Surg, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Duesseldorf, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Protective ostomy; Loop ileostomy; Loop colostomy; Diversion stoma; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; RENAL-FAILURE; RISK-FACTORS; READMISSION; MORBIDITY; STOMA; DEHYDRATION; CARCINOMA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-020-01940-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Construction of a temporary stoma is a common adjunct to low anterior resection for rectal cancer and can be accomplished either with loop ileostomy (LI) or loop colostomy (LC) with the question of the most appropriate one still remaining controversial. The aim of this study is to compare stoma-related morbidity between the two groups. Methods A retrospective review was conducted including 148 consecutive patients (LI: 55/LC: 93) who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2018 in our department. Time interval between low anterior resection and stoma reversal was similar for both groups. Comparison between the two groups was made regarding stoma-related morbidity after stoma construction and after stoma reversal, respectively. Results A total number of 17 patients suffered from complications after the construction of a protective LI compared with 25 patients after the construction of a LC (LI vs LC: 17/55 (30.1%) vs 25/93 (26.9%);p = 0.59). The most common morbidity noted in both groups before stoma closure was parastomal hernia, with the difference being statistically not significant (LI vs LC: 11/55 (20%) vs 21/93 (22.6%);p = 0.84). However, patients with LI suffered from significantly more peristomal skin irritations compared with the patients with LC (LI vs LC: 5/55 (9.1%) vs 1/93 (1.1%);p = 0.027). Overall morbidity rate after stoma closure was found to be comparable in both groups (LI vs LC: 7/37 (18.9%) vs 6/64 (9.4%);p = 0.16). The most common complication after stoma reversal was wound infection (LI vs LC: 5/37 (13.5%) vs 5/64 (7.8%);p = 0.49). Conclusion With the exception of a higher rate of skin irritation after LI construction, all other postoperative outcomes were found to be comparable in both study groups. Further randomized clinical trials are required to verify these findings. The study was registered in the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS00020766, date of registration: 11.02.2020).
引用
收藏
页码:1147 / 1153
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Huettner, Felix J.
    Probst, Pascal
    Mihaljevic, Andre
    Contin, Pietro
    Doerr-Harim, Colette
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Schneider, Martin
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Diener, Markus K.
    Knebel, Phillip
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [42] Risk factors of stoma re-creation after closure of diverting ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection or intersphincteric resection with loop ileostomy
    Song, Ook
    Kim, Kyung Hwan
    Lee, Soo Young
    Kim, Chang Hyun
    Kim, Young Jin
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 94 (04) : 203 - 208
  • [43] An evaluation of whether neoadjuvant therapy delays closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy following anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Bhangu, A.
    Tiramula, P.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2011, 66 (01) : 49 - 54
  • [44] LOOP ILEOSTOMY AND COLOSTOMY FOR FAECAL DIVERSION
    ALEXANDE.J
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1974, 54 (03) : 141 - 148
  • [45] Risk Factors for Nonclosure of a Temporary Defunctioning Ileostomy Following Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer
    Pan, Hong-Da
    Peng, Yi-Fan
    Wang, Lin
    Li, Ming
    Yao, Yun-Feng
    Zhao, Jun
    Zhan, Tian-Cheng
    Gu, Jin
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [46] Loop-Ileostomy versus Loop-Colostomy for Stool Removal after colorectal Anastomosis A Meta-Analysis
    Kienle, P.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2010, 32 (01) : 65 - 66
  • [47] Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy?
    Christian D. Klink
    Kosta Lioupis
    Marcel Binnebösel
    Daniel Kaemmer
    Ivanna Kozubek
    Jochen Grommes
    Ulf P. Neumann
    Marc Jansen
    Stefan Willis
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2011, 26 : 431 - 436
  • [48] Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy?
    Klink, Christian D.
    Lioupis, Kosta
    Binneboesel, Marcel
    Kaemmer, Daniel
    Kozubek, Ivanna
    Grommes, Jochen
    Neumann, Ulf P.
    Jansen, Marc
    Willis, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 26 (04) : 431 - 436
  • [49] Protective ileostomy after a low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients
    Kostov, G.
    Dimov, R.
    Ivanov, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 178 - 179
  • [50] Defunctioning Cannula Ileostomy After Lower Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer
    Hua, Hanju
    Xu, Jiahe
    Chen, Wenbin
    Zhou, Xile
    Wang, Jinhai
    Sheng, Qinsong
    Lin, Jianjiang
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (11) : 1267 - 1274