Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Prassas, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Vossos, Vasileios [1 ,2 ]
Rehders, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Knoefel, Wolfram Trudo [1 ,2 ]
Krieg, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ, Dept Surg, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Duesseldorf, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Protective ostomy; Loop ileostomy; Loop colostomy; Diversion stoma; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; RENAL-FAILURE; RISK-FACTORS; READMISSION; MORBIDITY; STOMA; DEHYDRATION; CARCINOMA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-020-01940-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Construction of a temporary stoma is a common adjunct to low anterior resection for rectal cancer and can be accomplished either with loop ileostomy (LI) or loop colostomy (LC) with the question of the most appropriate one still remaining controversial. The aim of this study is to compare stoma-related morbidity between the two groups. Methods A retrospective review was conducted including 148 consecutive patients (LI: 55/LC: 93) who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2018 in our department. Time interval between low anterior resection and stoma reversal was similar for both groups. Comparison between the two groups was made regarding stoma-related morbidity after stoma construction and after stoma reversal, respectively. Results A total number of 17 patients suffered from complications after the construction of a protective LI compared with 25 patients after the construction of a LC (LI vs LC: 17/55 (30.1%) vs 25/93 (26.9%);p = 0.59). The most common morbidity noted in both groups before stoma closure was parastomal hernia, with the difference being statistically not significant (LI vs LC: 11/55 (20%) vs 21/93 (22.6%);p = 0.84). However, patients with LI suffered from significantly more peristomal skin irritations compared with the patients with LC (LI vs LC: 5/55 (9.1%) vs 1/93 (1.1%);p = 0.027). Overall morbidity rate after stoma closure was found to be comparable in both groups (LI vs LC: 7/37 (18.9%) vs 6/64 (9.4%);p = 0.16). The most common complication after stoma reversal was wound infection (LI vs LC: 5/37 (13.5%) vs 5/64 (7.8%);p = 0.49). Conclusion With the exception of a higher rate of skin irritation after LI construction, all other postoperative outcomes were found to be comparable in both study groups. Further randomized clinical trials are required to verify these findings. The study was registered in the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS00020766, date of registration: 11.02.2020).
引用
收藏
页码:1147 / 1153
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interventions to reduce dehydration related to defunctioning loop ileostomy after low anterior resection in rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study
    Munshi, Eihab
    Bengtsson, Eva
    Blomberg, Karin
    Syk, Ingvar
    Buchwald, Pamela
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (09) : 1627 - 1631
  • [32] A Comparison of Transverse Loop Colostomy and Loop Ileostomy Complications
    McHague, C. J.
    Grainger, J.
    Chadwick, M.
    Rajaganeshan, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 124 - 124
  • [33] Closure of the temporary ileostomy after anterior resection
    Lordan, J. T.
    Heywood, R.
    Shirol, S.
    Edwards, D. P.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (08) : 759 - 759
  • [34] Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis
    Rondelli, F.
    Reboldi, P.
    Rulli, A.
    Barberini, F.
    Guerrisi, A.
    Izzo, L.
    Bolognese, A.
    Covarelli, P.
    Boselli, C.
    Becattini, C.
    Noya, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (05) : 479 - 488
  • [35] Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis
    F. Rondelli
    P. Reboldi
    A. Rulli
    F. Barberini
    A. Guerrisi
    L. Izzo
    A. Bolognese
    P. Covarelli
    C. Boselli
    C. Becattini
    G. Noya
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24 : 479 - 488
  • [36] Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: A retrospective, single institute, propensity score-matched study
    Sun, Xiyu
    Han, Huiqiao
    Qiu, Huizhong
    Wu, Bin
    Lin, Guole
    Niu, Beizhan
    Zhou, Jiaolin
    Lu, Junyang
    Xu, Lai
    Zhang, Guannan
    Xiao, Yi
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (01): : 123 - 129
  • [37] Meta-analysis of temporary loop ileostomy closure during or after adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer resection: the dilemma remains
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Sarma, Diwakar Ryali
    East, Jamie
    Zaman, Shafquat
    Mankotia, Rajnish
    Thompson, Christopher Vaun
    Torrance, Andrew W.
    Peravali, Rajeev
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (07) : 1151 - 1159
  • [38] Meta-analysis of temporary loop ileostomy closure during or after adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer resection: the dilemma remains
    Shahin Hajibandeh
    Shahab Hajibandeh
    Diwakar Ryali Sarma
    Jamie East
    Shafquat Zaman
    Rajnish Mankotia
    Christopher Vaun Thompson
    Andrew W Torrance
    Rajeev Peravali
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2019, 34 : 1151 - 1159
  • [39] Temporary Loop Ileostomy Closure During or After Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Rectal Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zakaria, R. M.
    Bhattacharya, P.
    Hajibandeh, S.
    Hajibandeh, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 75 - 75
  • [40] Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: A retrospective, single institution, propensity score-matched study
    Sun, Xiyu
    Han, Huiqiao
    Qiu, Huizhong
    Wu, Bin
    Lin, Guole
    Niu, Beizhan
    Zhou, Jiaolin
    Lu, Junyang
    Xu, Lai
    Zhang, Guannan
    Xiao, Yi
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 19 (02) : E5 - E11