Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Prassas, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Vossos, Vasileios [1 ,2 ]
Rehders, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Knoefel, Wolfram Trudo [1 ,2 ]
Krieg, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ, Dept Surg, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Duesseldorf, A Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Protective ostomy; Loop ileostomy; Loop colostomy; Diversion stoma; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; RENAL-FAILURE; RISK-FACTORS; READMISSION; MORBIDITY; STOMA; DEHYDRATION; CARCINOMA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-020-01940-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Construction of a temporary stoma is a common adjunct to low anterior resection for rectal cancer and can be accomplished either with loop ileostomy (LI) or loop colostomy (LC) with the question of the most appropriate one still remaining controversial. The aim of this study is to compare stoma-related morbidity between the two groups. Methods A retrospective review was conducted including 148 consecutive patients (LI: 55/LC: 93) who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2018 in our department. Time interval between low anterior resection and stoma reversal was similar for both groups. Comparison between the two groups was made regarding stoma-related morbidity after stoma construction and after stoma reversal, respectively. Results A total number of 17 patients suffered from complications after the construction of a protective LI compared with 25 patients after the construction of a LC (LI vs LC: 17/55 (30.1%) vs 25/93 (26.9%);p = 0.59). The most common morbidity noted in both groups before stoma closure was parastomal hernia, with the difference being statistically not significant (LI vs LC: 11/55 (20%) vs 21/93 (22.6%);p = 0.84). However, patients with LI suffered from significantly more peristomal skin irritations compared with the patients with LC (LI vs LC: 5/55 (9.1%) vs 1/93 (1.1%);p = 0.027). Overall morbidity rate after stoma closure was found to be comparable in both groups (LI vs LC: 7/37 (18.9%) vs 6/64 (9.4%);p = 0.16). The most common complication after stoma reversal was wound infection (LI vs LC: 5/37 (13.5%) vs 5/64 (7.8%);p = 0.49). Conclusion With the exception of a higher rate of skin irritation after LI construction, all other postoperative outcomes were found to be comparable in both study groups. Further randomized clinical trials are required to verify these findings. The study was registered in the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS00020766, date of registration: 11.02.2020).
引用
收藏
页码:1147 / 1153
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Dimitrios Prassas
    Vasileios Vossos
    Alexander Rehders
    Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
    Andreas Krieg
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2020, 405 : 1147 - 1153
  • [2] Meta-analysis: loop ileostomy versus colostomy to prevent complications of anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Yang, Shilai
    Tang, Gang
    Zhang, Yudi
    Wei, Zhengqiang
    Du, Donglin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2024, 39 (01)
  • [3] Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Du, Rui
    Zhou, Jiajie
    Tong, Guifan
    Chang, Yue
    Li, Dongliang
    Wang, Feng
    Ding, Xu
    Zhang, Qi
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Liuhua
    Wang, Daorong
    EJSO, 2021, 47 (07): : 1514 - 1525
  • [4] Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery
    Rullier, E
    Le Toux, N
    Laurent, C
    Garrelon, JL
    Parneix, M
    Saric, J
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 25 (03) : 274 - 278
  • [5] Loop Ileostomy versus Loop Colostomy for Defunctioning Low Anastomoses during Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Eric Rullier
    Nathalie Le Toux
    Christophe Laurent
    Jean-Luc Garrelon
    Michel Parneix
    Jean Saric
    World Journal of Surgery, 2001, 25 : 274 - 278
  • [6] Quality of life after low anterior resection and temporary loop ileostomy
    Tsunoda, Akira
    Tsunoda, Yuko
    Narita, Kazuhiro
    Watanabe, Makoto
    Nakao, Kentaro
    Kusano, Mitsuo
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (02) : 218 - 222
  • [7] Loop ileostomy following anterior resection: is it really temporary?
    David, G. G.
    Slavin, J. P.
    Willmott, S.
    Corless, D. J.
    Khan, A. U.
    Selvasekar, C. R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (05) : 428 - 432
  • [8] Timely closure of loop ileostomy following anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Chand, M.
    Nash, G. F.
    Talbot, R. W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2008, 17 (06) : 611 - 615
  • [9] Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy
    Gooszen, AW
    Geelkerken, RH
    Hermans, J
    Lagaay, MB
    Gooszen, HG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 85 (01) : 76 - 79
  • [10] Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy
    Torkington, J
    Khetan, N
    Jamison, MH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 85 (10) : 1452 - 1452